You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
No longer Call Of Duty
Posted:
No longer Call Of DutyPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Black Ops II!
What has TreyArch done? Black Ops II is no longer a typical Call Of Duty game; although, the game is great. Now I know we all have a different take on the game so don't bash me cause the way I see it. I foresaw this day since the release of Modern warfare, also know as Call Of Duty 4. This game, Black Ops II, requires less skill in some areas and more in others. Back in the old days you could run & gun and do well, that's no longer possible. It takes approximately 3 to 4 shots to kill people with just about any gun, so now instead of running and gunning you must 'camp' and have the 'better angle.' Let me elaborate.
Black Ops 1, scenario 1: Skilled Player runs and guns, gets double teamed and survives, constantly moving and getting about 2 to 3 kills for every death.
Black ops 1, scenario 2: Sniper/ 'camper' with not so much skill. 'Camps' or snipes misses most shots, get about 1 to 2 kills for every death because the skilled players catch on and kill the 'campers.'
Now, what Black Ops II introduced is a fair gaming environment. Where instead of kill streaks, you have score streaks. <--- Kind of irrelevant from my point, but it shows they're attempting to be fair. So like I stated earlier, this game is all about position.
Since it takes less bullets to kill someone as long as you have the advantage, whether its position, an extra teammate, or a more accurate gun for actual gun fights, you can kill any player.
So....
Black Ops II, scenario 1: Skilled player runs and guns and goes kill for kill because they are double teamed and take way too much damage, or the enemy's head and shoulders is the only thing visible compared to the player's entire body.
Black Ops II, scenario 2: 'Camper' or sniper 'camps' they use position, strategy and advantage, like they tried to in Black Ops 1 and does well. This is constituted by the fact that sniping is so easy a monkey could do it and that with the advantage you will almost always win.
Black Ops II is more realistic and less game like, compared to all other gun games of the sort which are less realistic and more game like.
To sum it up, the gaming field is more realistic and more balanced.
Feel free to rebuttal, agree or qualify what I'm trying to say just don't bash me. Remember it's just my opinion and you have yours.
Happy Thanksgiving everyone! Have a great day and thanks for your time!
What has TreyArch done? Black Ops II is no longer a typical Call Of Duty game; although, the game is great. Now I know we all have a different take on the game so don't bash me cause the way I see it. I foresaw this day since the release of Modern warfare, also know as Call Of Duty 4. This game, Black Ops II, requires less skill in some areas and more in others. Back in the old days you could run & gun and do well, that's no longer possible. It takes approximately 3 to 4 shots to kill people with just about any gun, so now instead of running and gunning you must 'camp' and have the 'better angle.' Let me elaborate.
Black Ops 1, scenario 1: Skilled Player runs and guns, gets double teamed and survives, constantly moving and getting about 2 to 3 kills for every death.
Black ops 1, scenario 2: Sniper/ 'camper' with not so much skill. 'Camps' or snipes misses most shots, get about 1 to 2 kills for every death because the skilled players catch on and kill the 'campers.'
Now, what Black Ops II introduced is a fair gaming environment. Where instead of kill streaks, you have score streaks. <--- Kind of irrelevant from my point, but it shows they're attempting to be fair. So like I stated earlier, this game is all about position.
Since it takes less bullets to kill someone as long as you have the advantage, whether its position, an extra teammate, or a more accurate gun for actual gun fights, you can kill any player.
So....
Black Ops II, scenario 1: Skilled player runs and guns and goes kill for kill because they are double teamed and take way too much damage, or the enemy's head and shoulders is the only thing visible compared to the player's entire body.
Black Ops II, scenario 2: 'Camper' or sniper 'camps' they use position, strategy and advantage, like they tried to in Black Ops 1 and does well. This is constituted by the fact that sniping is so easy a monkey could do it and that with the advantage you will almost always win.
Black Ops II is more realistic and less game like, compared to all other gun games of the sort which are less realistic and more game like.
To sum it up, the gaming field is more realistic and more balanced.
Feel free to rebuttal, agree or qualify what I'm trying to say just don't bash me. Remember it's just my opinion and you have yours.
Happy Thanksgiving everyone! Have a great day and thanks for your time!
The following 2 users thanked BobbyBonBons for this useful post:
TheBeastMode (11-22-2012), vTxMoDz (11-22-2012)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 201014Year Member
Posts: 85
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 201014Year Member
Posts: 85
Reputation Power: 3
I second this statement very good read my sir
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
^^^ Thank You!!! ^^^
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,231
Reputation Power: 138
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,231
Reputation Power: 138
Agreed, it kinda saddens me that CoD is changing up the gameplay that I've enjoyed for the last 4 years.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 201014Year Member
Posts: 85
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 201014Year Member
Posts: 85
Reputation Power: 3
I hate domination on this game I loved the old Dom but switching sides after 4 mins makes no **** sence
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,895
Reputation Power: 824
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,895
Reputation Power: 824
somebody wasted 2 hours writing this. Call of Duty is a good game. It is not a good game to the people that get mad at campers, noobtubers, or people with a higher skill level. Why? because you get mad at them and blame it on the game. EVERY Call Of Duty has its ups and downs but they are still call of duty.
#HateThePlayerNotTheGame
#HateThePlayerNotTheGame
- 0useful
- 4not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 03, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,441
Reputation Power: 82
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 03, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,441
Reputation Power: 82
As a Call of Duty player since CoD on PC and CoD 2 when the Xbox first launch, Black Ops 2 is my favorite CoD to date (besides 4, that one is obviously everyone's favorite). Treyarch has made great leaps to make this game feel new, and bring some revitalization into the CoD franchise, because getting the same "Modern Warfare" game every year IW made a game was awfully boring, and really got stale after MW2. There are some things that need tweaking, i.e. some really bad spawns and the occasional "WTF How did he not die moments", but overall this CoD actually feels different, not a $60 re-skin with the same weapons. I can sum up every CoD for you in one sentence after MW1.
MW2: UMP-45 and OMA tubes, extreme tryhards drop shotting everything that moves, and kids that try to get extremely stupid "1337-360-Qu1cK-ScoPeZz" trickshots.
Black Ops 1: AK-74u and Famas, with kids camping in every corner imaginable with Flack Jacket and motion sensors.
MW3: The worst one since CoD4, with EXTREME tryhards that do nothing but use the MP7 and the overpowered shotgun known as the striker.
Black Ops 2 really feels different in my opinion. You cant play aggressively every single second, unlike every CoD before. Surprise surprise, you might actually have to THINK about the situation your entering, not just run in, drop shot, and kill everyone. A team that is cautious and tactical will dominate a team full of MP7-using tryhards that just sprint around every corner, and then complain that they died.
Something that really upsets me about the CoD community, is the fact that there is no maturity or sportsmanship at all. If a sniper dies by someone using the scope that is actually on the sniper , then I guess the only reason he died was because the other guy was a "hardscoping noob". Someone dies from behind, that person complains that the only way that one person can get kills is by sneaking up from behind. There is no admittance of defeat. You cant win every game. If you lose, accept the fact that you lost and move on. Dont make excuses for every single thing.
Last edited by Music-Matt ; edited 1 time in total
MW2: UMP-45 and OMA tubes, extreme tryhards drop shotting everything that moves, and kids that try to get extremely stupid "1337-360-Qu1cK-ScoPeZz" trickshots.
Black Ops 1: AK-74u and Famas, with kids camping in every corner imaginable with Flack Jacket and motion sensors.
MW3: The worst one since CoD4, with EXTREME tryhards that do nothing but use the MP7 and the overpowered shotgun known as the striker.
Black Ops 2 really feels different in my opinion. You cant play aggressively every single second, unlike every CoD before. Surprise surprise, you might actually have to THINK about the situation your entering, not just run in, drop shot, and kill everyone. A team that is cautious and tactical will dominate a team full of MP7-using tryhards that just sprint around every corner, and then complain that they died.
Something that really upsets me about the CoD community, is the fact that there is no maturity or sportsmanship at all. If a sniper dies by someone using the scope that is actually on the sniper , then I guess the only reason he died was because the other guy was a "hardscoping noob". Someone dies from behind, that person complains that the only way that one person can get kills is by sneaking up from behind. There is no admittance of defeat. You cant win every game. If you lose, accept the fact that you lost and move on. Dont make excuses for every single thing.
Last edited by Music-Matt ; edited 1 time in total
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 201212Year Member
Posts: 102
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 201212Year Member
Posts: 102
Reputation Power: 3
I think the problem is the community if the community played the game how its supposed to be played it would be very fun
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 535
Reputation Power: 24
The only problem about CoD is that the people who play it are just better than you. Like most of the people in the topic said, if a person kills you by hardscoping than you have to face it. If someone kills you from the back of you, you can not just say that he is bad and can only kill you from the back. Honestly I do rage and I ususally get mad from getting killed from behind and getting hardscoped, but now I realized from the majority of the people who say not to, not to rage. If you guys are reading this do not say the game is bad or it is the worst, just let it go and continue playing the game.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 29, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,345
Reputation Power: 131
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 29, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,345
Reputation Power: 131
Black Ops 2 sucks D***. The knifing in Black Ops 2 is so horrible. It takes 5 melees to kill 1 person. They put a probation for rage quitting? I think they should make a 5 minute probation every time someone sits in a damn corner because campers are getting really annoying. All campers worry about is their KD, really? Get a life
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.