You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
TTG What Formation Would You Suggest
Posted:
TTG What Formation Would You SuggestPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 88
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 88
Reputation Power: 3
Title sais it all .. looking for a new formation whihc is solid at back and good attacking to any suggestions ... thanks
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 59
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 59
Reputation Power: 2
4-1-2-1-2
Best Overall Formation Strong All Around
Best Overall Formation Strong All Around
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 60
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 60
Reputation Power: 2
Hmm ok thanks bro ill have to give it a try players cost a bomb in that formation tho lol
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 199
Reputation Power: 290
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 199
Reputation Power: 290
4-1-2-1-2 is probably the best formation as Flexerr said but it is a rather expensive formation to choose another good formation is 4-5-1 and players don't cost so much.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 59
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 59
Reputation Power: 2
Chubz wrote 4-1-2-1-2 is probably the best formation as Flexerr said but it is a rather expensive formation to choose another good formation is 4-5-1 and players don't cost so much.
True but then you need a good lone striker and thats hard to find .
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 199
Reputation Power: 290
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 199
Reputation Power: 290
Flexerr wroteChubz wrote 4-1-2-1-2 is probably the best formation as Flexerr said but it is a rather expensive formation to choose another good formation is 4-5-1 and players don't cost so much.
True but then you need a good lone striker and thats hard to find .
Nah it's not that hard, all you need to do is find someone with a bit of pace and height, job done.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 59
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 59
Reputation Power: 2
Chubz wroteFlexerr wroteChubz wrote 4-1-2-1-2 is probably the best formation as Flexerr said but it is a rather expensive formation to choose another good formation is 4-5-1 and players don't cost so much.
True but then you need a good lone striker and thats hard to find .
Nah it's not that hard, all you need to do is find someone with a bit of pace and height, job done.
Fair Enough, But If Your Willing To Pay For 4-1-2-1-2 Its Good If Not Then As Chubz Said Use 4-5-1
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 60
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 60
Reputation Power: 2
Ok thanks for the help guys ill check out the prices in 4-1-2-1-2 if not then 4-5-1 it is
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 244
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 244
Reputation Power: 10
4-3-2-1 , Such a good formation with the LF And RF
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 60
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 60
Reputation Power: 2
Yeah true but leaves u a bit dead at the back dont ya think
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.