Sop wrote

Mr-Ninjah wrote Population means nothing, compared to strategy
How did us colonist win our independence from Britain?
Out numbered by the thousands.
What about the civil war?
The south out numbered the north as well.

Did you just say that the south out numbered the north! Gtfo
learn your history

Don't be rude, I haven't been in american history in years.
I made a mistake. It was that the south put up a fight since most of the battles where fought in south territory.

i believe US but thats my opinion. The only other country that could compete is Russia, and we'd still **** em up.

Mr-Ninjah wrote

Sop wrote

Mr-Ninjah wrote Population means nothing, compared to strategy
How did us colonist win our independence from Britain?
Out numbered by the thousands.
What about the civil war?
The south out numbered the north as well.

Did you just say that the south out numbered the north! Gtfo
learn your history

Don't be rude, I haven't been in american history in years.
I made a mistake. It was that the south put up a fight since most of the battles where fought in south territory.

The South never outnumbered the North in any way other than military tradition. They were simply a group of states who gambled everything on the momentum of the invasion of the North but the moment it stopped, the recoil would come back harder than the bullet.

England would.

/thread

the323909 wrote England would.

/thread

I think Australia has the same chances as England.

Sop wrote

Mr-Ninjah wrote Population means nothing, compared to strategy
How did us colonist win our independence from Britain?
Out numbered by the thousands.
What about the civil war?
The south out numbered the north as well.

Did you just say that the south out numbered the north! Gtfo
learn your history

The north out numbered the south

Runite wrote

the323909 wrote England would.

/thread

I think Australia has the same chances as England.

Oh yep, definitely guys.

They'd totally beat China.. mhhm..

UK_cHaDd3rZ wrote china would win i think. the US is normally helped by the UK. i am from the UK and we always have to back americans up. china has the best technology. although america has ONE OF THE BEST armys and they would hopefully know what to do china would still win. they make all of the technology. they have the most tanks in the world and also i think china would just completely dominate and we the UK would be asked to help them out.
im referring to Vietnam. my opinion but i think that the US strives to far and they bite of more than they can chew. we also have to back them up in IRAQ and also afghan. we are allies and i like the US but china would easily dominate. the UK doesn't have as much vehicle power but we to have one of the best trained army's. the outcome of this war would be pointless because nobody would win in real terms. we would all suffer from this and we would be paying the price if anybody at all survived it would most likely start WW3

If we were in a war with the uk weed go after u first and u guys couldn't do shit bout it ******

Mr-Ninjah wrote Population means nothing, compared to strategy
How did us colonist win our independence from Britain?
Out numbered by the thousands.
What about the civil war?
The south out numbered the north as well.

1 US marine who is trained vs. 100 Chinese troops with basic training. Chinese troops win. Strategy beats population to a point, but 10:1 (comparing army sizes)there isn't much of a chance.

i think china has 23 tanks and 90 troops for every 1 american lol i dont know but yeah