THuNdErModsCoD wrote

Rezqal wrote

ShoeFi wrote I doubt that ww3 will happen

Yeah same here, people say we will because of Israel and Iran, but I doubt it. Us attacking Iran would be stupid, considering what our government has done in the past.

I don't think any WWIII is going to happen. This is because the powers are balanced and if one attacks the other world power will not causing only the loss of one country. This would do nothing.

Actually if you think about it would do something. Lets say the US gets wiped out. Not only will this effect the world economy, it also stops meat production and the poor countries we help would starve and create a famine. Don't think US could get wiped out? Lets look at China. What do you see on almost everything? MADE IN CHINA, this would massively decrease production. And the list goes on but yeah, it would have some effect it wouldn't just do nothing.

Wisest wrote
Don't be ignorant, please.


China would not win in a war against the United States, the number of troops doesn't mean anything. The amount of money spent for military is what makes a military the strongest, and if you think "nuclear weapons" are the only thing to worry about there are much greater threats and weapons that America has produced. America has the strongest military and there are no denying these facts.

The "safest" country in a war would actually be Switzerland as they actually have enough fallout shelters to cover 114% of it's population. Disregarding these facts, going to war with America (whether China, or Russia) the victor would be quite obvious. Britain produced more weapons for America than China, and China did not produce the military forces and weapons that America uses today.

Actually numbers do matter. One country, even as great as the US, could only take on so many. And even if the US does beat China in a war, China could put us into a depression with how much many we owe them, so we would not only lose money on war and debt, the US likes to rebuild the places we destroyed such as in Iraq and Afghanistan. So we would be losing 3x the money.

Rezqal wrote

Wisest wrote
Don't be ignorant, please.


China would not win in a war against the United States, the number of troops doesn't mean anything. The amount of money spent for military is what makes a military the strongest, and if you think "nuclear weapons" are the only thing to worry about there are much greater threats and weapons that America has produced. America has the strongest military and there are no denying these facts.

The "safest" country in a war would actually be Switzerland as they actually have enough fallout shelters to cover 114% of it's population. Disregarding these facts, going to war with America (whether China, or Russia) the victor would be quite obvious. Britain produced more weapons for America than China, and China did not produce the military forces and weapons that America uses today.

Actually numbers do matter. One country, even as great as the US, could only take on so many. And even if the US does beat China in a war, China could put us into a depression with how much many we owe them, so we would not only lose money on war and debt, the US likes to rebuild the places we destroyed such as in Iraq and Afghanistan. So we would be losing 3x the money.

If we fought China and won we wouldn't pay them back. What are they gonna do fight us we would have whooped their ass once so yes. China only has numbers not actual military strength

stephen219 wrote

Rezqal wrote

Wisest wrote
Don't be ignorant, please.


China would not win in a war against the United States, the number of troops doesn't mean anything. The amount of money spent for military is what makes a military the strongest, and if you think "nuclear weapons" are the only thing to worry about there are much greater threats and weapons that America has produced. America has the strongest military and there are no denying these facts.

The "safest" country in a war would actually be Switzerland as they actually have enough fallout shelters to cover 114% of it's population. Disregarding these facts, going to war with America (whether China, or Russia) the victor would be quite obvious. Britain produced more weapons for America than China, and China did not produce the military forces and weapons that America uses today.

Actually numbers do matter. One country, even as great as the US, could only take on so many. And even if the US does beat China in a war, China could put us into a depression with how much many we owe them, so we would not only lose money on war and debt, the US likes to rebuild the places we destroyed such as in Iraq and Afghanistan. So we would be losing 3x the money.

If we fought China and won we wouldn't pay them back. What are they gonna do fight us we would have whooped their ass once so yes. China only has numbers not actual military strength

They could stop sending us manufactured goods. We depend on China to make everything for us, and not because we're lazy, but because we pay them literally nothing to do our work so big companies have huge profit.

You're aware that if the U.S go to war with China, They bring NATO along with them? We're talking about US, UK, France and Germany vs China - Anyway, What lead to this?

You do know, that China's population is so high because of the rate their population is reproducing.

They would, if the cause was severe enough, they would just say **** the economy and continue into war. BTW, china wouldn't cause ww3 currently, it would be north korea.

They shut down the global stock market, so we can avoid another depression

NoStock Market= No New Great Depression

The next great war will be religion based.

Fackinell wrote The next great war will be religion based.

It could be, but you have to think many countries have more than one religion, so it would be a civil war in that war, unless they want to be like Germany in WW2 and separate to where it was West Germany and Germany.