You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,039
Reputation Power: 183
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,039
Reputation Power: 183
jonpon11 wrote No because there's tons of people who have jtags, there would be way too many awesome badges. Frankly having a Jtag is not worthy of an awesome badge.
good post mate
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,768
Reputation Power: 66
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,768
Reputation Power: 66
lolz, thats what livestreamers are for?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,150
Reputation Power: 283
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,150
Reputation Power: 283
no? so many people would have it thats a dumb thing
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 24, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,726
Reputation Power: 159
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 24, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,726
Reputation Power: 159
They should just have a badge that says, Jtag Owner or something like that. Not Awesome.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 4,513
Reputation Power: 226
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 4,513
Reputation Power: 226
dylan456 wrote I don't think that would be a good idea because to many people will have the awesome badge
i agree. i see how it could be a good idea, then again way to many people have a jtag now days.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.