Johnny-Cash wrote

-EQ wrote "taking these guns away won't do anything"
Are you a fcuking idiot bro? Look at the statistics of other countries' before speaking **** like FOX news... You're probably some 12 year old gun fanatic. Why would you need to protect yourself from your own government. Has it ever happened in the last 20 years where we needed to use guns to protect us from the gov. The second amendment is outdated and also I DO live in the US

Actually i am 15 and and me my dad and my grandpa is apart of the NRA and please stop with these post's saying (0MG W3 N33D T0 B4N GUN5 IT WI11 S0LV3 3V3RYTH1NG!!!111!!!) For **** sake please you probally have never shot a gun.

That explains it. Your 15 and apart of the NRA?
That causes you to be in a biased position.
I'm 18, and I shot guns from the time I was 7 until I was 14.
Still won't cause me to ignore facts.

Mimz wrote

Johnny-Cash wrote So your saying the uk is not civilized? because they have some of the highest robbery,murder,beatings etc.....Rates. Anyways your argument is invalid because no matter what gun' will NEVER be banned in the u.s.

That doesn't make it invalid, just the United States is possibly ignorant.
You can't ignore the fact that of all of the civilized countries and crime rates, United States is one of the highest. Same with homicide involving guns and weapons.

I never said the UK wasn't. But the fact that I've only heard or seen that reporter mention UK being incredibly higher then US is weird.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
^American murder rate
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
^British article talking about it being at an all time low. And stating crime statistics.

Either way, ignoring that fact that banning the useless weapons would decrease the homicide rate is ridiculous.
If only handguns and hunting rifles were allowed, then there would be a decrease over time.

Also, why would you need an AR?
You don't need one to kill deer LOL

Actually AR's are extremely useful against feral hog's and are very fun to target shoot (many exert marksmen use AR's so dont say their useless. Now i understand putting more paper work and regulations into buying one but banning them doesn't make sense.

Mimz wrote

Johnny-Cash wrote

-EQ wrote "taking these guns away won't do anything"
Are you a fcuking idiot bro? Look at the statistics of other countries' before speaking **** like FOX news... You're probably some 12 year old gun fanatic. Why would you need to protect yourself from your own government. Has it ever happened in the last 20 years where we needed to use guns to protect us from the gov. The second amendment is outdated and also I DO live in the US

Actually i am 15 and and me my dad and my grandpa is apart of the NRA and please stop with these post's saying (0MG W3 N33D T0 B4N GUN5 IT WI11 S0LV3 3V3RYTH1NG!!!111!!!) For **** sake please you probally have never shot a gun.

That explains it. Your 15 and apart of the NRA?
That causes you to be in a biased position.
I'm 18, and I shot guns from the time I was 7 until I was 14.
Still won't cause me to ignore facts.

Does my age really matter i happen to be extremly well knowledged on gun's and gun law's.

If you excuse me im really tired im going to bed.

Johnny-Cash wrote

Mimz wrote

Johnny-Cash wrote So your saying the uk is not civilized? because they have some of the highest robbery,murder,beatings etc.....Rates. Anyways your argument is invalid because no matter what gun' will NEVER be banned in the u.s.

That doesn't make it invalid, just the United States is possibly ignorant.
You can't ignore the fact that of all of the civilized countries and crime rates, United States is one of the highest. Same with homicide involving guns and weapons.

I never said the UK wasn't. But the fact that I've only heard or seen that reporter mention UK being incredibly higher then US is weird.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
^American murder rate
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
^British article talking about it being at an all time low. And stating crime statistics.

Either way, ignoring that fact that banning the useless weapons would decrease the homicide rate is ridiculous.
If only handguns and hunting rifles were allowed, then there would be a decrease over time.

Also, why would you need an AR?
You don't need one to kill deer LOL

Actually AR's are extremely useful against feral hog's and are very fun to target shoot (many exert marksmen use AR's so dont say their useless. Now i understand putting more paper work and regulations into buying one but banning them doesn't make sense.

I guarantee those feral hogs can be killed without an automatic.
They may be fun to shoot, but I'm sure bombs are fun to set on fire.
Should we make them legal for purchase?
Just because expert marksman use them, doesn't make them have a logical usage.
Why does a civilian need access to something just because expert marksman and the army have access.
For events, give the shooters a weapon to use on closed grounds. Problem solved, no need to purchase.

-EQ wrote "taking these guns away won't do anything"
Are you a fcuking idiot bro? Look at the statistics of other countries' before speaking **** like FOX news... You're probably some 12 year old gun fanatic. Why would you need to protect yourself from your own government. Has it ever happened in the last 20 years where we needed to use guns to protect us from the gov. The second amendment is outdated and also I DO live in the US

Why would our government oppress us before getting rid of the guns? That would be the worst move ever. This could potentially be a set up to that position. It's one of those "better safe than sorry" situations. I personally don't like the possibility of becoming a police state and/or being oppressed by the government. The guns keep that from happening. You can't predict the future and what type of leaders we will have in the next 100 years, so the guns are a safety net because of that fact.

Johnny-Cash wrote

-EQ wrote "taking these guns away won't do anything"
Are you a fcuking idiot bro? Look at the statistics of other countries' before speaking **** like FOX news... You're probably some 12 year old gun fanatic. Why would you need to protect yourself from your own government. Has it ever happened in the last 20 years where we needed to use guns to protect us from the gov. The second amendment is outdated and also I DO live in the US

Actually i am 15 and and me my dad and my grandpa is apart of the NRA and please stop with these post's saying (0MG W3 N33D T0 B4N GUN5 IT WI11 S0LV3 3V3RYTH1NG!!!111!!!) For **** sake please you probally have never shot a gun.

Actually, my dad used to own a gun but yes I have never shot one. Second, I never said that it will solve anything and this is the RANT section... you cant have an argument without two sides.

Johnny-Cash wrote

Mimz wrote

Johnny-Cash wrote

-EQ wrote "taking these guns away won't do anything"
Are you a fcuking idiot bro? Look at the statistics of other countries' before speaking **** like FOX news... You're probably some 12 year old gun fanatic. Why would you need to protect yourself from your own government. Has it ever happened in the last 20 years where we needed to use guns to protect us from the gov. The second amendment is outdated and also I DO live in the US

Actually i am 15 and and me my dad and my grandpa is apart of the NRA and please stop with these post's saying (0MG W3 N33D T0 B4N GUN5 IT WI11 S0LV3 3V3RYTH1NG!!!111!!!) For **** sake please you probally have never shot a gun.

That explains it. Your 15 and apart of the NRA?
That causes you to be in a biased position.
I'm 18, and I shot guns from the time I was 7 until I was 14.
Still won't cause me to ignore facts.

Does my age really matter i happen to be extremly well knowledged on gun's and gun law's.

The fact that your so young and already apart of an organization known to have biased opinions, yes it does. Just because you know a lot about weapons doesn't mean anything. My point is your set in a biased situation and it's easy to see that banning the sale of useless weapons such as Assault Rifles would decrease the homicide rates at the expense of having fun pulling a trigger at targets.

Mimz wrote

Johnny-Cash wrote

Mimz wrote

Johnny-Cash wrote So your saying the uk is not civilized? because they have some of the highest robbery,murder,beatings etc.....Rates. Anyways your argument is invalid because no matter what gun' will NEVER be banned in the u.s.

That doesn't make it invalid, just the United States is possibly ignorant.
You can't ignore the fact that of all of the civilized countries and crime rates, United States is one of the highest. Same with homicide involving guns and weapons.

I never said the UK wasn't. But the fact that I've only heard or seen that reporter mention UK being incredibly higher then US is weird.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
^American murder rate
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
^British article talking about it being at an all time low. And stating crime statistics.

Either way, ignoring that fact that banning the useless weapons would decrease the homicide rate is ridiculous.
If only handguns and hunting rifles were allowed, then there would be a decrease over time.

Also, why would you need an AR?
You don't need one to kill deer LOL

Actually AR's are extremely useful against feral hog's and are very fun to target shoot (many exert marksmen use AR's so dont say their useless. Now i understand putting more paper work and regulations into buying one but banning them doesn't make sense.

I guarantee those feral hogs can be killed without an automatic.
They may be fun to shoot, but I'm sure bombs are fun to set on fire.
Should we make them legal for purchase?
Just because expert marksman use them, doesn't make them have a logical usage.
Why does a civilian need access to something just because expert marksman and the army have access.
For events, give the shooters a weapon to use on closed grounds. Problem solved, no need to purchase.

1 more thing before i go to bed. Their are hunting rifles (non-ar15 rifles) that hold 10+ rounds and are more powerfull and take less that 5 seconds to reload . So you cant really blame it on clip size or because it's (semiautomatic) because their are hunting rifle's that are semiautomatic.

Yin wrote

-EQ wrote "taking these guns away won't do anything"
Are you a fcuking idiot bro? Look at the statistics of other countries' before speaking **** like FOX news... You're probably some 12 year old gun fanatic. Why would you need to protect yourself from your own government. Has it ever happened in the last 20 years where we needed to use guns to protect us from the gov. The second amendment is outdated and also I DO live in the US

Why would our government oppress us before getting rid of the guns? That would be the worst move ever. This could potentially be a set up to that position. It's one of those "better safe than sorry" situations. I personally don't like the possibility of becoming a police state and/or being oppressed by the government. The guns keep that from happening. You can't predict the future and what type of leaders we will have in the next 100 years, so the guns are a safety net because of that fact.

It's not getting rid of guns really but we really need to trust the government. It's not like guns are the only thing that keep you safe, im sure in 100 years they will have far better technology than that