Reaiming wrote Far Cry 3, probably because I haven't played played ACIII but it doesn't looks nearly as good as Far Cry 3.

they are both good games I'd say if u like shooting go for far cry 3 if u like stealth assassins creed 3

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

Oahu wrote Which should I get and why?

Assassins creed 3 has an amazing story line just on its own, it doesn't follow any of the other assassin creed's. It has awesome game mechanics once you get used to them. Real good graphics in some parts. It keeps up with the action, there are endless things to do. Hardly any bugs (none that I found). All in All, being a huge AC3 nerd. I give it a 9/10. They just don't have any DLC. Oh, the multiplayer is a bit more balanced. It can still piss you off more then MW3, but still. Took me about 13 hours to complete.

Far cry 3 is also an amazing game. I'm on my 3rd play-through. It has pretty good graphics. I noticed some bugs with enemies spawning in front of me in multiple numbers. Sometimes the story wont progress because I went to far ahead or killed someone/something the wrong way. It has a long story line, it took me about 10-12 hours. I was fooling around for about 2 hours though. But yea, both games are awesome. far cry definitely gets a 9/10 as well.

Please tell me how on earth AC3 doesn't follow the other AC's when it blatantly does?

Have you even played the game?

Derp. Yes I have played the game. Have you? Tell me how it does, please explain. Besides Desmond's story. Once you step into the animus, its a brand new story. A native American fighting back. How does that follow Ezio's story? Or even Altiar's? I never once heard Ezio's name. So trying to start an argument is really pointless when you don't even know what you're talking about.

I've got both and I have lost interest in Far Cry and more into AC3. I would suggest you get it, as it is a great game with an extraordinary multi-player.

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

Oahu wrote Which should I get and why?

Assassins creed 3 has an amazing story line just on its own, it doesn't follow any of the other assassin creed's. It has awesome game mechanics once you get used to them. Real good graphics in some parts. It keeps up with the action, there are endless things to do. Hardly any bugs (none that I found). All in All, being a huge AC3 nerd. I give it a 9/10. They just don't have any DLC. Oh, the multiplayer is a bit more balanced. It can still piss you off more then MW3, but still. Took me about 13 hours to complete.

Far cry 3 is also an amazing game. I'm on my 3rd play-through. It has pretty good graphics. I noticed some bugs with enemies spawning in front of me in multiple numbers. Sometimes the story wont progress because I went to far ahead or killed someone/something the wrong way. It has a long story line, it took me about 10-12 hours. I was fooling around for about 2 hours though. But yea, both games are awesome. far cry definitely gets a 9/10 as well.

Please tell me how on earth AC3 doesn't follow the other AC's when it blatantly does?

Have you even played the game?

Derp. Yes I have played the game. Have you? Tell me how it does, please explain. Besides Desmond's story. Once you step into the animus, its a brand new story. A native American fighting back. How does that follow Ezio's story? Or even Altiar's? I never once heard Ezio's name. So trying to start an argument is really pointless when you don't even know what you're talking about.

The main story behind every AC is Desmond's story, so obviously AC3 has a lot to do with the other AC's considering this is the end of Desmond's story.

i would get Far Cry 3

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

Oahu wrote Which should I get and why?

Assassins creed 3 has an amazing story line just on its own, it doesn't follow any of the other assassin creed's. It has awesome game mechanics once you get used to them. Real good graphics in some parts. It keeps up with the action, there are endless things to do. Hardly any bugs (none that I found). All in All, being a huge AC3 nerd. I give it a 9/10. They just don't have any DLC. Oh, the multiplayer is a bit more balanced. It can still piss you off more then MW3, but still. Took me about 13 hours to complete.

Far cry 3 is also an amazing game. I'm on my 3rd play-through. It has pretty good graphics. I noticed some bugs with enemies spawning in front of me in multiple numbers. Sometimes the story wont progress because I went to far ahead or killed someone/something the wrong way. It has a long story line, it took me about 10-12 hours. I was fooling around for about 2 hours though. But yea, both games are awesome. far cry definitely gets a 9/10 as well.

Please tell me how on earth AC3 doesn't follow the other AC's when it blatantly does?

Have you even played the game?

Derp. Yes I have played the game. Have you? Tell me how it does, please explain. Besides Desmond's story. Once you step into the animus, its a brand new story. A native American fighting back. How does that follow Ezio's story? Or even Altiar's? I never once heard Ezio's name. So trying to start an argument is really pointless when you don't even know what you're talking about.

The main story behind every AC is Desmond's story, so obviously AC3 has a lot to do with the other AC's considering this is the end of Desmond's story.

"Obviously" No. Just no. Desmond's story and Connor's story. Desmond's story I didn't pay attention to. Other then bringing it up to the ending. And that...well I can't say anything without ruining something. But Connor's main story is taking revenge on the person(s) that killed his mother. It's completely different.

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

Oahu wrote Which should I get and why?

Assassins creed 3 has an amazing story line just on its own, it doesn't follow any of the other assassin creed's. It has awesome game mechanics once you get used to them. Real good graphics in some parts. It keeps up with the action, there are endless things to do. Hardly any bugs (none that I found). All in All, being a huge AC3 nerd. I give it a 9/10. They just don't have any DLC. Oh, the multiplayer is a bit more balanced. It can still piss you off more then MW3, but still. Took me about 13 hours to complete.

Far cry 3 is also an amazing game. I'm on my 3rd play-through. It has pretty good graphics. I noticed some bugs with enemies spawning in front of me in multiple numbers. Sometimes the story wont progress because I went to far ahead or killed someone/something the wrong way. It has a long story line, it took me about 10-12 hours. I was fooling around for about 2 hours though. But yea, both games are awesome. far cry definitely gets a 9/10 as well.

Please tell me how on earth AC3 doesn't follow the other AC's when it blatantly does?

Have you even played the game?

Derp. Yes I have played the game. Have you? Tell me how it does, please explain. Besides Desmond's story. Once you step into the animus, its a brand new story. A native American fighting back. How does that follow Ezio's story? Or even Altiar's? I never once heard Ezio's name. So trying to start an argument is really pointless when you don't even know what you're talking about.

The main story behind every AC is Desmond's story, so obviously AC3 has a lot to do with the other AC's considering this is the end of Desmond's story.

"Obviously" No. Just no. Desmond's story and Connor's story. Desmond's story I didn't pay attention to. Other then bringing it up to the ending. And that...well I can't say anything without ruining something. But Connor's main story is taking revenge on the person(s) that killed his mother. It's completely different.

Desmond's story is behind everything of every AC, his story is the whole point.
Yes on AC3 he is a completely new ancestor in a different time but the main story is the Desmond story because that's what AC is all about, therefore AC3 has a lot to do with the other AC's, idiot.

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

Oahu wrote Which should I get and why?

Assassins creed 3 has an amazing story line just on its own, it doesn't follow any of the other assassin creed's. It has awesome game mechanics once you get used to them. Real good graphics in some parts. It keeps up with the action, there are endless things to do. Hardly any bugs (none that I found). All in All, being a huge AC3 nerd. I give it a 9/10. They just don't have any DLC. Oh, the multiplayer is a bit more balanced. It can still piss you off more then MW3, but still. Took me about 13 hours to complete.

Far cry 3 is also an amazing game. I'm on my 3rd play-through. It has pretty good graphics. I noticed some bugs with enemies spawning in front of me in multiple numbers. Sometimes the story wont progress because I went to far ahead or killed someone/something the wrong way. It has a long story line, it took me about 10-12 hours. I was fooling around for about 2 hours though. But yea, both games are awesome. far cry definitely gets a 9/10 as well.

Please tell me how on earth AC3 doesn't follow the other AC's when it blatantly does?

Have you even played the game?

Derp. Yes I have played the game. Have you? Tell me how it does, please explain. Besides Desmond's story. Once you step into the animus, its a brand new story. A native American fighting back. How does that follow Ezio's story? Or even Altiar's? I never once heard Ezio's name. So trying to start an argument is really pointless when you don't even know what you're talking about.

The main story behind every AC is Desmond's story, so obviously AC3 has a lot to do with the other AC's considering this is the end of Desmond's story.

"Obviously" No. Just no. Desmond's story and Connor's story. Desmond's story I didn't pay attention to. Other then bringing it up to the ending. And that...well I can't say anything without ruining something. But Connor's main story is taking revenge on the person(s) that killed his mother. It's completely different.

Desmond's story is behind everything of every AC, his story is the whole point.
Yes on AC3 he is a completely new ancestor in a different time but the main story is the Desmond story because that's what AC is all about, therefore AC3 has a lot to do with the other AC's, idiot.

You're knowledge on AC3 just baffles me. I think you're just jealous because you knew I was right on my first post. Then you retaliated. Now that you're knee deep in you're own stupidity that you want to seem like you have to backup you're opinion. Then you name-call? Name-calling is kindergarten material. How about you and me agree to disagree and stop arguing on this guy's post. Because honestly, I don't see this getting anywhere.

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

JonesUFC wrote

soulsoprano wrote

Oahu wrote Which should I get and why?

Assassins creed 3 has an amazing story line just on its own, it doesn't follow any of the other assassin creed's. It has awesome game mechanics once you get used to them. Real good graphics in some parts. It keeps up with the action, there are endless things to do. Hardly any bugs (none that I found). All in All, being a huge AC3 nerd. I give it a 9/10. They just don't have any DLC. Oh, the multiplayer is a bit more balanced. It can still piss you off more then MW3, but still. Took me about 13 hours to complete.

Far cry 3 is also an amazing game. I'm on my 3rd play-through. It has pretty good graphics. I noticed some bugs with enemies spawning in front of me in multiple numbers. Sometimes the story wont progress because I went to far ahead or killed someone/something the wrong way. It has a long story line, it took me about 10-12 hours. I was fooling around for about 2 hours though. But yea, both games are awesome. far cry definitely gets a 9/10 as well.

Please tell me how on earth AC3 doesn't follow the other AC's when it blatantly does?

Have you even played the game?

Derp. Yes I have played the game. Have you? Tell me how it does, please explain. Besides Desmond's story. Once you step into the animus, its a brand new story. A native American fighting back. How does that follow Ezio's story? Or even Altiar's? I never once heard Ezio's name. So trying to start an argument is really pointless when you don't even know what you're talking about.

The main story behind every AC is Desmond's story, so obviously AC3 has a lot to do with the other AC's considering this is the end of Desmond's story.

"Obviously" No. Just no. Desmond's story and Connor's story. Desmond's story I didn't pay attention to. Other then bringing it up to the ending. And that...well I can't say anything without ruining something. But Connor's main story is taking revenge on the person(s) that killed his mother. It's completely different.

Desmond's story is behind everything of every AC, his story is the whole point.
Yes on AC3 he is a completely new ancestor in a different time but the main story is the Desmond story because that's what AC is all about, therefore AC3 has a lot to do with the other AC's, idiot.

You're knowledge on AC3 just baffles me. I think you're just jealous because you knew I was right on my first post. Then you retaliated. Now that you're knee deep in you're own stupidity that you want to seem like you have to backup you're opinion. Then you name-call? Name-calling is kindergarten material. How about you and me agree to disagree and stop arguing on this guy's post. Because honestly, I don't see this getting anywhere.

Okay then. PM me and tell me exactly how my knowledge of AC3 "baffles" you.