ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

Clover- wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote Ok, Pyre, say you lived here your whole life and you were a citizen of the US. You would NOT be saying ban the gun's. Because you just don't get it and you think it will be the solution to everything.

No, believe it or not, there are some people that don't want to own a firearm, ever. Even if I lived in America, I wouldn't want to be associated with guns.

But the problem is, you haven't lived here your whole life! You don't see it the same way as we do. If you did live here, you probably would have some sort of gun.

That may be. But as a neutral party, I'm in favor of a gun-ban. It's worked for other countries, why not the US.

I am sorry for butting in on this conversation. But I do see your point in this. I am an American born citizen. And, at first I never wanted a gun. But after moving down to the state of Kentucky, I realized that having a gun means you can do so much. You can hunt for food, shoot targets for fun, etc. But a gun-ban will do the US no good. If they did ban it, in my opinion, there will be a lot more riots in the US because over 90% of the American population has a gun in there house for safety.

And, in no way am I trying to say you are wrong, and I am right. But I do respect what you said, and it makes a valid point.

Thanks. Atleast someone isn't ignorant. It works both ways aswell, I can see positives of having a gun, don't get me wrong, but I think a human life is more important than hunting for buck.

Looking back at almost everything you posted, what you are trying to say is banning guns will stop killing. Which there are other ways you can kill, you know that right?

No. I'm trying to say that banning guns will stop gun crime.

GUN CRIME?! You don't have to have a gun to kill somebody! If they want to do it bad enough, they will, no matter what it takes.

Referring back to more statistics. Gun crime makes up 40% of the homicides in the US. If guns were banned, that's get vastly reduced. Thus reducing almost 1/3 of the killings in the US.

So, you say that people like Adam Lanza will still try and kill a school full of children, whether he had a gun or not? Very true. But imagine how much less the loss of life would have been if he had only had access to a freaking switchblade. Sure, there's no cure for insanity maybe, but there are ways to make it much less violent.

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

Chiellini wrote

Pyre wrote

Clover- wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote Ok, Pyre, say you lived here your whole life and you were a citizen of the US. You would NOT be saying ban the gun's. Because you just don't get it and you think it will be the solution to everything.

No, believe it or not, there are some people that don't want to own a firearm, ever. Even if I lived in America, I wouldn't want to be associated with guns.

But the problem is, you haven't lived here your whole life! You don't see it the same way as we do. If you did live here, you probably would have some sort of gun.

That may be. But as a neutral party, I'm in favor of a gun-ban. It's worked for other countries, why not the US.

I am sorry for butting in on this conversation. But I do see your point in this. I am an American born citizen. And, at first I never wanted a gun. But after moving down to the state of Kentucky, I realized that having a gun means you can do so much. You can hunt for food, shoot targets for fun, etc. But a gun-ban will do the US no good. If they did ban it, in my opinion, there will be a lot more riots in the US because over 90% of the American population has a gun in there house for safety.

And, in no way am I trying to say you are wrong, and I am right. But I do respect what you said, and it makes a valid point.

Thanks. Atleast someone isn't ignorant. It works both ways aswell, I can see positives of having a gun, don't get me wrong, but I think a human life is more important than hunting for buck.

I really wish you would stop calling people ignorant for having opinions. You're basically saying "if you don't agree with me, you're just stupid."

No, I'm open to people having opinions. However, when people can't see it from the other sides point of view, it's ignorant.

You just called yourself ignorant...

No, I said people who can't see it from others perspectives. I can understand the appeal of having a gun. I can see why you think you need one. I just have opposing opinions. Whereas you seem to be 100% for guns without thinking of any other solution.

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

Clover- wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote Ok, Pyre, say you lived here your whole life and you were a citizen of the US. You would NOT be saying ban the gun's. Because you just don't get it and you think it will be the solution to everything.

No, believe it or not, there are some people that don't want to own a firearm, ever. Even if I lived in America, I wouldn't want to be associated with guns.

But the problem is, you haven't lived here your whole life! You don't see it the same way as we do. If you did live here, you probably would have some sort of gun.

That may be. But as a neutral party, I'm in favor of a gun-ban. It's worked for other countries, why not the US.

I am sorry for butting in on this conversation. But I do see your point in this. I am an American born citizen. And, at first I never wanted a gun. But after moving down to the state of Kentucky, I realized that having a gun means you can do so much. You can hunt for food, shoot targets for fun, etc. But a gun-ban will do the US no good. If they did ban it, in my opinion, there will be a lot more riots in the US because over 90% of the American population has a gun in there house for safety.

And, in no way am I trying to say you are wrong, and I am right. But I do respect what you said, and it makes a valid point.

Thanks. Atleast someone isn't ignorant. It works both ways aswell, I can see positives of having a gun, don't get me wrong, but I think a human life is more important than hunting for buck.

Looking back at almost everything you posted, what you are trying to say is banning guns will stop killing. Which there are other ways you can kill, you know that right?

No. I'm trying to say that banning guns will stop gun crime.

GUN CRIME?! You don't have to have a gun to kill somebody! If they want to do it bad enough, they will, no matter what it takes.

Referring back to more statistics. Gun crime makes up 40% of the homicides in the US. If guns were banned, that's get vastly reduced. Thus reducing almost 1/3 of the killings in the US.

Referring back to my statement. If they wan't to do it bad enough, they will! With a gun or not, it will happen.

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

Clover- wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote Ok, Pyre, say you lived here your whole life and you were a citizen of the US. You would NOT be saying ban the gun's. Because you just don't get it and you think it will be the solution to everything.

No, believe it or not, there are some people that don't want to own a firearm, ever. Even if I lived in America, I wouldn't want to be associated with guns.

But the problem is, you haven't lived here your whole life! You don't see it the same way as we do. If you did live here, you probably would have some sort of gun.

That may be. But as a neutral party, I'm in favor of a gun-ban. It's worked for other countries, why not the US.

I am sorry for butting in on this conversation. But I do see your point in this. I am an American born citizen. And, at first I never wanted a gun. But after moving down to the state of Kentucky, I realized that having a gun means you can do so much. You can hunt for food, shoot targets for fun, etc. But a gun-ban will do the US no good. If they did ban it, in my opinion, there will be a lot more riots in the US because over 90% of the American population has a gun in there house for safety.

And, in no way am I trying to say you are wrong, and I am right. But I do respect what you said, and it makes a valid point.

Thanks. Atleast someone isn't ignorant. It works both ways aswell, I can see positives of having a gun, don't get me wrong, but I think a human life is more important than hunting for buck.

Looking back at almost everything you posted, what you are trying to say is banning guns will stop killing. Which there are other ways you can kill, you know that right?

No. I'm trying to say that banning guns will stop gun crime.

GUN CRIME?! You don't have to have a gun to kill somebody! If they want to do it bad enough, they will, no matter what it takes.

Referring back to more statistics. Gun crime makes up 40% of the homicides in the US. If guns were banned, that's get vastly reduced. Thus reducing almost 1/3 of the killings in the US.

Referring back to my statement. If they wan't to do it bad enough, they will! With a gun or not, it will happen.

Yes, but without the gun the chances are cut by a third.

McGeady wrote Idk why they dont just ban guns already.

Whats the going to solve? Absolutely nothing. If a murder wants to get a weapon. he/she will get a weapon. What do they care if they get it off the black market? What do they care if they buy from gangs? They dont. They are getting it for a reason. To do harm. Which will end up with a bullet in their own head or them in jail.

Can we stop about all the Gun-Ban, Gun Crime flaming going back in forth? Either way, it is not the Governments choice. They can make a Bill for it, but they will need citizens to vote on it, I believe. I may be wrong, and if I am. Please correct me. But Gun-Ban will only cause more Gun Crime.

OT: I am sorry to hear about the kid who got shot. It is a shame that sick, twisted adults need to kill innocent kids.

Seriously messed up. It's so wrong how people go after kids.

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

Chiellini wrote

Pyre wrote

Clover- wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote Ok, Pyre, say you lived here your whole life and you were a citizen of the US. You would NOT be saying ban the gun's. Because you just don't get it and you think it will be the solution to everything.

No, believe it or not, there are some people that don't want to own a firearm, ever. Even if I lived in America, I wouldn't want to be associated with guns.

But the problem is, you haven't lived here your whole life! You don't see it the same way as we do. If you did live here, you probably would have some sort of gun.

That may be. But as a neutral party, I'm in favor of a gun-ban. It's worked for other countries, why not the US.

I am sorry for butting in on this conversation. But I do see your point in this. I am an American born citizen. And, at first I never wanted a gun. But after moving down to the state of Kentucky, I realized that having a gun means you can do so much. You can hunt for food, shoot targets for fun, etc. But a gun-ban will do the US no good. If they did ban it, in my opinion, there will be a lot more riots in the US because over 90% of the American population has a gun in there house for safety.

And, in no way am I trying to say you are wrong, and I am right. But I do respect what you said, and it makes a valid point.

Thanks. Atleast someone isn't ignorant. It works both ways aswell, I can see positives of having a gun, don't get me wrong, but I think a human life is more important than hunting for buck.

I really wish you would stop calling people ignorant for having opinions. You're basically saying "if you don't agree with me, you're just stupid."

No, I'm open to people having opinions. However, when people can't see it from the other sides point of view, it's ignorant.

You just called yourself ignorant...

No, I said people who can't see it from others perspectives. I can understand the appeal of having a gun. I can see why you think you need one. I just have opposing opinions. Whereas you seem to be 100% for guns without thinking of any other solution.

Obviously you didn't see what I posted earlier.

Dear Pyre I think you don't understand that the problem its not just about the guns that all you care about is getting rid of guns..
How is geting rid of the guns going to make me feel safe , someome thats mental ill could easily build a gun and come into my house and shoot me. Shit what do I do call the police o wait they don't have a gun, fight back no o yeah talk him out of it logical

Adam Lanza Killed his mom with her gun, how sick do you have to be. He was also allowed out of jail knowing he had Severe mental issues

Your family one day-honey there someone Breaking in... Ill talk him out of this bang bang your kids are died, he is coming for you wait let me talk to him man put the gun down (no your dead)
Or honey someone Breaking ok I'll grab the shot gun you get the .45 get to the kids room. Bang mans Dead family's alive. Your kids live to see Another day and dady will do anything to protect them

I don't take murder Lightly, my dad was a police officer and one of good friends was guned down in a police car on break haveing a conversation on the phone with his wife. the gun was found later on and it was illegal.



Okay, you're an embarrassment to anyone in here trying to have a serious debate. You're talking about murder as if it was nothing. Yes, I'd have to risk myself by disarming someone, or I could use simple psychology to try and calm the attacker down. Not shoot him.