You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Who is the better/original artist?
Posted:
Who is the better/original artist?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 188
Reputation Power: 7
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 188
Reputation Power: 7
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201311Year Member
Posts: 83
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201311Year Member
Posts: 83
Reputation Power: 4
They are both sort of bad, but in all reality #1 is a more OG designer because he actually does designs somewhat, doesn't jut slap screens on 3d text.
- 4useful
- 2not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 2,083
Reputation Power: 88
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 2,083
Reputation Power: 88
Iny opinion I would have to choose artist number one
- 2useful
- 2not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 12, 201311Year Member
Posts: 31
Reputation Power: 1
Neither are all that great, but like the other 2 said, Artist 1 is better. Artist 2's work is common and not even really good compared to that type of work. Artist 1's is unique and not just 3D text with a solid background and random effects thrown behind the text.
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,837
Reputation Power: 132
OK People saying unique.....ITS NOT
Artist one
3D text background....well done
Flying 3D parts intro......well done
Neither original or unique.
Artist two
Stay away from graphics pack that you just layer up.
All in all I would go for Artist two.
Simply for the fact he is not a 12 year old trying to win internet fame by boasting on a Gamming site about amateur graphics.
Artist one
3D text background....well done
Flying 3D parts intro......well done
Neither original or unique.
Artist two
Stay away from graphics pack that you just layer up.
All in all I would go for Artist two.
Simply for the fact he is not a 12 year old trying to win internet fame by boasting on a Gamming site about amateur graphics.
- 2useful
- 3not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,032
Reputation Power: 41
Artist two for sure the first one is terrible
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 16, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,696
Reputation Power: 72
They are not original to be honest you see stuff like everywhere, although you both have the right ideas, just keep practicing, you both have potential to be pretty good.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 30, 201112Year Member
Posts: 3,461
Reputation Power: 151
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 30, 201112Year Member
Posts: 3,461
Reputation Power: 151
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,313
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,313
Reputation Power: 40
I think we can disregard the "Original" part....
Who's the better artist.
#2
Who's the better artist.
#2
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 563
Reputation Power: 24
The second one looks like crap and the first one is actually nice. The Pi behind the symbol is a little unreadable but it's alright. The second one is just stuff from a graphics pack and simple Cinema 4D.
- 1useful
- 1not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.