Lavish wrote Maybe a 5/10.

AMD Processors are yuck, and you would need a 660 at least to be able to run all games at at least high without lagging.

Yeah you're right a leading company in designing and manufacturing CPU's who is constantly competing with other companies, one upping its competition, and being one upped cannot produce a CPU for shit.

God I wish fanboys like you weren't so arrogant.

Buxty wrote 7/10 but i'd give you 8/10 for sticking to what you want and going AMD! Woo!

Honestly theres no reason why people shouldnt go AMD. In the Uk theres a huge price difference between equivalent AMD and Intel CPU's and admittedly you need to OC the hell out of AMD to match up performance wise but i'd rather spend the time than the money ;)

I am agreeing with you 100% the pricing for intel is crazy high and i havent noticed one bad thing with amd yet. I can play crysis 3 on high and farcry 3 on high also without the littlest lag. When i finish the games and look at my processors temp and usage from playing it and its uses about 3/4 of it witch i thing is still fast.

DarksydeZach wrote

Lavish wrote Maybe a 5/10.

AMD Processors are yuck, and you would need a 660 at least to be able to run all games at at least high without lagging.

Yeah you're right a leading company in designing and manufacturing CPU's who is constantly competing with other companies, one upping its competition, and being one upped cannot produce a CPU for ****.

God I wish fanboys like you weren't so arrogant.

So you're telling me my i7 3770k is shit?
Are you stupid?

How am I a fanboy because Intel CPU's are simply better?
My low rating was based on the GPU, rather than the CPU.

Intel are just overpriced IMO

U don't have proof dat it yours but I'd give it a
6/10

Prestige-Master wrote U don't have proof dat it yours but I'd give it a
6/10

Proof? look at the first pic. i edited the post and took a picture with a paper saying ChronicsXDK and TheBlueMODZ.

what else would you like?