Reap wrote

Click to View Content

Scrubbier wrote

Reap wrote

Scrubbier wrote Hoax . The flag was moving and there were no stars , also the moon had no craters .

Okay , but explain why there were no stars ? Or why the moon had no craters .

Watch the video I just posted...

thanks for exposing them to the truth I cany believe they think its a hoax

Definitely a HOAX!

1-the flag was blowing in the film
2-no stars in the pictures
3-the rock had the letter 'c' carved into it
3-no craters in any pictures
4-we cant get to the moon now cos we don't have the technology so what makes you think that we could in 1969
5-their suits and rocket were made out of aluminium which is used to make tin foil
6-this never could have happened it was America trying to beat Russia to the moon
7 -it was filmed at area 51 in the Nevada desert

PestilenceHD wrote Definitely a HOAX!

1-the flag was blowing in the film
2-no stars in the pictures
3-the rock had the letter 'c' carved into it
3-no craters in any pictures
4-we cant get to the moon now cos we don't have the technology so what makes you think that we could in 1969
5-their suits and rocket were made out of aluminium which is used to make tin foil
6-this never could have happened it was America trying to beat Russia to the moon
7 -it was filmed at area 51 in the Nevada desert

You just completely copied what owenjennings said...

I think it was real.

The fact of the matter is ... "the video you see where the flag's moving is because the astronaut just placed it there, and the inertia from when they let go kept it moving,"

The astronauts also accidentally bent the horizontal rods holding the flag in place several times, creating the appearance of a rippling flag in pics.

"Atmospheric pollution", is what causes stars to 'twinkle'. Stars 'shine' because of nuclear fusion, as the Sun does. If you were referring to planets, however, they shine simply because they reflect the light from the Sun. Without the atmosphere, stars should be more visible. As for why there are no stars in the photographs, it might be due to the exposure of the cameras. Cameras were adjusted to properly expose the astronauts and their surroundings, which are well illuminated by the Sun that is brighter than the stars. As such, the cameras did not capture dimmer light from the stars, just like when your eyes cannot 'capture' the light from stars during the day.

So these are two well supported facts that are able to prove the moon landing was real. But it could as well have been fact i guess.

I cant believe people are even saying about craters. Don't they realise that they're so big that they're either in ONE or they landed on a flat place which would be safe to do so since the craft wouldn't break up on landing.