You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
5-2-2-1 or 4-3-2-1? Your opinions
Posted:

5-2-2-1 or 4-3-2-1? Your opinionsPosted:

ninja290
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 330
Reputation Power: 12
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 330
Reputation Power: 12
I want to know which formation to use... post below please
Thanks
#2. Posted:
_Bale
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,248
Reputation Power: 48
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,248
Reputation Power: 48
4321 by far, easily the best out of the two
#3. Posted:
Hurleh
  • TTG Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 12,820
Reputation Power: 831
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 12,820
Reputation Power: 831
i love 5-2-2-1 it is soo good because all of the attacks are close together so get a fair share of goals and you have a big defence
#4. Posted:
Cokes
  • 2 Million
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,957
Reputation Power: 598
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,957
Reputation Power: 598
I would go with 4321. It's better.
#5. Posted:
Pathos
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Both are two of my most favorite formations. I'm a pretty big pace-abuser so it always helps having really quick wingers. Also, 5 at the back is the best counter for the sweaty b*stards that use 3-5-2.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.