You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Gally3
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 304
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 304
Reputation Power: 14
Ive never had an aggressive guy on this!

Hope i never do either!

Thanks, Gally
#12. Posted:
MaFiAAnthony
  • Prospect
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201014Year Member
Posts: 622
Reputation Power: 24
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201014Year Member
Posts: 622
Reputation Power: 24
Rainbow_Dash wrote
MaFiAAnthony wrote Honestly rep doesnt mean anything anymore if you can't give someone "bad reputation"

Reputation never meant anything - it was always heavily augmented every 50 posts, not comparable to Dimebag adding a thousand or two Rep to his and some others accounts some years ago. Negative Rep was useless too, only abused by people who didn't get what they want. Omnipotent Being forbid those people now having both the ability to see who rated their post as 'not useful' and also being able to give negative Rep.


Reputation meant something back on that (was it v1) board? Needless to say, people took rep seriously back in the day, because you could actually have someone with negative rep, which would show they were a Flamer, scammer, etc. But a lot of people did abuse it so whatever. Rep is useless now.
#13. Posted:
r00t
  • Administrator
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,414
Reputation Power: 24459
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,414
Reputation Power: 24459
I'm happy it's gone. Negative rep was around for awhile when I first joined and it was just a source of negativity.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.