UniqDesigns wrote

CortexDesigns wrote

UniqDesigns wrote

CortexDesigns wrote There is nothing "Uniq" about these designs. Basic and repetitive. anyone paying is simple

what is ur port then, ive seen no one good on ttg in a while + I need to update my stuff i was on a hiatus

You seen no one good on TTG for a while....proves you are a complete goon

wtf kid u call my old stuff bad, but u do Motion Graphics from like 2007... nuff nuff

ur only a senior because ur on here 24/7

please check the last few of my posts.....24/7?

2007??

Kid??

I would argue but all your points are invalid.

Pretty common styles, execution needs alot of work. Read some tuts, try to develop your own style

sacks of garbage covered in turd messes, absolutely horrendous waste attributed to lack of sex appeal

UniqDesigns wrote

CortexDesigns wrote There is nothing "Uniq" about these designs. Basic and repetitive. anyone paying is simple

what is ur port then, ive seen no one good on ttg in a while + I need to update my stuff i was on a hiatus

How is his portfolio even relevant to yours?
Your work is not unique. It is an overused style, and they're all very basic.
That is a fact.
Whether he is a better designer or not, based on his portfolio, like you asked to see, does not matter at all.

Plus, there's a handful of good designers on TTG.
Most of which are not very active.
But it takes time to create a decent, original piece, so you can't blame them.

Not to mention, your "logos" aren't even logos.
You are presenting them as avatars, not logos.
And you can't even see half of them.
To see what an actual logo looks like, and how it should be presented, I suggest taking a look at Daemon-Inkz.

Yeah everything i could have said has been said a few times, statement agreed.