BigWes wrote You clearly are biased towards bikes. Also, you fail to recognize that the biker was slowing down while looking back, it does not make sense at all. Now what does make sense is that he was antagonizing the SUV, just a bunch of crazed dudes that think they own the road. Well look what it caused them.

P.S: Cars are not SUV's. There is a big difference, four wheels or two wheels does not make a difference on how your supposed to drive, same traffic laws apply.

No, I'm not biased towards any, I'm using my head and I understand that no-one has any right to cripple a man for something that could have been prevented if he had just manned up and said sorry to the guy he just bumped.

BigWes wrote

HyperViper wrote

Moby wrote Please, stop calling everyone biased.
You cannot look at a situation like this objectively, you formulated an opinion the second you turned off the video.

Of course i ''formulated'' an opinion, just like you.

Taken from what the people in the car said in an interview:

Our fear for our lives was confirmed when the incident ended with the ruthless and brutal attack on my husband, me, and, most importantly, our two-year-old child.''

What a load of BS, the only person getting attacked was the driver yet the woman is trying to make it it was on all of them, again, trying to make it sound worse than it is. The media have always had it in for bikers, more than 6 riders together is a ''gang'' nowadays. It's pathetic, it really is.

So your saying a minority of 25+ raged bikers around two victims (Mom and Daughter) is not dangerous. You are insane and out of your mind.

Do you see the mother & child getting attacked? No, no danger towards them at all, stop trying to imply there was.

I am glad that mofo got crippled. People like that deserve it, I wish the SUV driver would have injured and/or killed more of those ******.

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote You clearly are biased towards bikes. Also, you fail to recognize that the biker was slowing down while looking back, it does not make sense at all. Now what does make sense is that he was antagonizing the SUV, just a bunch of crazed dudes that think they own the road. Well look what it caused them.

P.S: Cars are not SUV's. There is a big difference, four wheels or two wheels does not make a difference on how your supposed to drive, same traffic laws apply.

No, I'm not biased towards any, I'm using my head and I understand that no-one has any right to cripple a man for something that could have been prevented if he had just manned up and said sorry to the guy he just bumped.

HE DID NOT BUMP HIM, THE BIKER SLOWED DOWN, SO THE SUV DRIVER WOULD LOOK AT FAULT, AND OF COURSE THE BIKER OVERREACTED BECAUSE OF HOW SPECIAL AND EXCLUSIVE HE MUST BE. You are completely stupid and biased towards motorcyclists.

HyperViper wrote

Moby wrote Please, stop calling everyone biased.
You cannot look at a situation like this objectively, you formulated an opinion the second you turned off the video.

Of course i ''formulated'' an opinion, just like you.

Taken from what the people in the car said in an interview:

Our fear for our lives was confirmed when the incident ended with the ruthless and brutal attack on my husband, me, and, most importantly, our two-year-old child.''

What a load of BS, the only person getting attacked was the driver yet the woman is trying to make it it was on all of them, again, trying to make it sound worse than it is. The media have always had it in for bikers, more than 6 riders together is a ''gang'' nowadays. It's pathetic, it really is.

I know I formulated an opinion, so did BigWes, Yin and Dunder, but that bias doesn't mean what we're saying is wrong.

You have just demonstrated your bias perfectly, "The media have always had it in for bikers"
Does that mean what you're saying about the video is wrong?
No. What you're saying about the video makes what you're saying about the video wrong.

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote

HyperViper wrote

Moby wrote Please, stop calling everyone biased.
You cannot look at a situation like this objectively, you formulated an opinion the second you turned off the video.

Of course i ''formulated'' an opinion, just like you.

Taken from what the people in the car said in an interview:

Our fear for our lives was confirmed when the incident ended with the ruthless and brutal attack on my husband, me, and, most importantly, our two-year-old child.''

What a load of BS, the only person getting attacked was the driver yet the woman is trying to make it it was on all of them, again, trying to make it sound worse than it is. The media have always had it in for bikers, more than 6 riders together is a ''gang'' nowadays. It's pathetic, it really is.

So your saying a minority of 25+ raged bikers around two victims (Mom and Daughter) is not dangerous. You are insane and out of your mind.

Do you see the mother & child getting attacked? No, no danger towards them at all, stop trying to imply there was.

They were in a potentially dangerous situation, they injured the SUV driver (The father) with a knife, who knows what they could have done to his family while he bled in the middle of the street. You are just incompetent with the actual facts.

CuRiouCitY wrote I am glad that mofo got crippled. People like that deserve it, I wish the SUV driver would have injured and/or killed more of those *******.

really? nobody deserves to be killed at all what kind of sick mind do you have

BigWes wrote HE DID NOT BUMP HIM, THE BIKER SLOWED DOWN, SO THE SUV DRIVER WOULD LOOK AT FAULT, AND OF COURSE THE BIKER OVERREACTED BECAUSE OF HOW SPECIAL AND EXCLUSIVE HE MUST BE. You are completely stupid and biased towards motorcyclists.

Lol, so now it's a insurance fraud conspiracy, just like the other guy who tried saying it, poor attempt at being a troll.

BigWes wrote They were in a potentially dangerous situation, they injured the SUV driver (The father) with a knife, who knows what they could have done to his family while he bled in the middle of the street. You are just incompetent with the actual facts.

Now you've gone from implying it's an insurance fraud to now that they would murder the family or something, wow kid, just wow.

HyperViper wrote

Yin wrote Two frames in the video show exactly who is at fault

You don't do this in the middle of the road for no reason. You are at fault. I would compare it to those insurance scams that trap a driver to hit them. He even looked back at the SUV to see if he was in front of it. You say the SUV had time to stop. I say the biker had time to speed up. All in all, you don't stop in the middle of the road for no reason: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

You also don't pin a vehicle so it can't go anywhere. That itself is a form of intimidation and self defense is justified. Since it was self defense, it justifies the crippling of a man (even as bad as that sounds.) [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Lol, now it's changed to an insurance scam conspiracy, the lengths some people will go to, he was looking behind to check how far away he was, that's what you do on bikes sometimes.

You are trying to stick up for someone who has crippled a man, pathetic.

You do know what the word 'compare' means, yes? You could 'compare, it to an insurance scam. I was stating that the motorcycle guy had the intentions on either getting hit or stopping the SUV for no reason at all. That is dangerous and against the law. The biker had room to move. Why didn't he slow down on the side of the road or somewhere near the bikers? There is no justification right in the middle of the road in front of a random person's SUV unless you had intentions to stop it (which there were zero reason to stop it.)

I'm not justifying the crippling per se. I am justifying what it takes to protect your family and get them out of harms way. The man could have died and I would still call it justified. That is like saying someone shooting an intruder in their home is at fault. Common sense says to either let the SUV pass or ride with them. Common sense should not say brake-check the guy and trap him. There are just no thoughts in that.