HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote Why would I give up to a hard-headed idiot who thinks he has proven this argument with no legitimate facts.

I have countered everything you've said with facts, opinions, and common sense. You failed early on so resorted to attacking my grammar and myself in real life just like you little trolls do.

Give up.

Give up why? Explain why we should give up? Rather then twisting our words, changing the subject and calling us trolls; explain this to us. By the way, the SUV driver is 100% innocent, any action he had came about after being provoked by the 25+ bikers.

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote Why would I give up to a hard-headed idiot who thinks he has proven this argument with no legitimate facts.

I have countered everything you've said with facts, opinions, and common sense. You failed early on so resorted to attacking my grammar and myself in real life just like you little trolls do.

Give up.

How about on your personality: You are a bigot. Umad?

Moby wrote This is worse than calling people bias, you can't win a subjective debate.
Stop telling people to give up.

You haven't proven anyone wrong, you just don't want to answer.
An emotional attack is just as valid as a physical one.
So no one laid a finger on the child, the kid still had to watch their father get dragged out of a car and beaten up whilst the front window was smashed in, which could have easily injured the child.

I actually can't believe you're defending these bikers who are obviously savages after the evidence that Dunder provided of their criminal history.

I have answered everything, how can you say I haven't you complete moron?

A teacher with a criminal history can get a job, does that maker he/she a savage? No, again, you are biased towards bikers. The mother and child never got attacked yet in her interview she used the words ''Attack, me, baby'' in the same sentence which most people will portray as a physical attack thus making out they actually did.

You just keep repeating yourself, that's why I post ''Give up''.

BigWes wrote

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote Why would I give up to a hard-headed idiot who thinks he has proven this argument with no legitimate facts.

I have countered everything you've said with facts, opinions, and common sense. You failed early on so resorted to attacking my grammar and myself in real life just like you little trolls do.

Give up.

Give up why? Explain why we should give up? Rather then twisting our words, changing the subject and calling us trolls; explain this to us. By the way, the SUV driver is 100% innocent, any action he had came about after being provoked by the 25+ bikers.

Only in America would people get away with crippling someone.

7boots wrote

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote Why would I give up to a hard-headed idiot who thinks he has proven this argument with no legitimate facts.

I have countered everything you've said with facts, opinions, and common sense. You failed early on so resorted to attacking my grammar and myself in real life just like you little trolls do.

Give up.

How about on your personality: You are a bigot. Umad?

People still use ''UMAD''?! You are clearly a kid, kids still use that and think it's sup4r c00l to do so.

HyperViper wrote

Moby wrote

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote You can't read, you twist words, and your a complete idiot.

Talk your way out of this:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

He says "hits the back window".
You said the back window was not smashed, at what time did Moby say the back window was smashed.

Just give up, you've been proven wrong and now you're attempting everything you can.

What? You've never been emotionally attacked? Bullied?
I think you've finally come up against something you can't worm your way out of without sounding like the most immoral person viewing the thread.

An attack is generally thought of as a physical attack, espeically in the media. You don't say ''My house was broken in to, it was attacked'' ''He called me ugly, he attacked me with words''.

I haven't come up against anything, it's you lot who have come up with things like:

- Biker tried to fraud insurance
- Attacked my grammar
- Said I never go outside etc

The list goes on, you're struggling in this argument so resort to find little nuggets of things to use against me, some of them I have listed for you.

You're merely just young trolls.

All of those 3 things you have misinterpreted.

1. No one said the bikers tried to do it for insurance purposes. People COMPARED the stop to something someone WOULD do in a situation where it was for insurance purposes.
2. I haven't attacked your grammar, BigWes did because you called him a kid. So who is really in the wrong there?
3. Dunder said you never go outside because you seem to have no knowledge of how things work, you seem to have no knowledge of a fight or flight reaction or how bikes and cars are supposed to behave on a road, it was a sarcastic comment, get over it.

It's not finding little 'nuggets' it's providing new material.
Just because this has been going on for a while doesn't make what we're saying any less valid.

An attack refers to emotional or physical abuse, this is a common definition, just because YOU specifically usually see it used in reference to physical attacks doesn't mean it can't also and doesn't also refer to emotional attacks.

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote Why would I give up to a hard-headed idiot who thinks he has proven this argument with no legitimate facts.

I have countered everything you've said with facts, opinions, and common sense. You failed early on so resorted to attacking my grammar and myself in real life just like you little trolls do.

Give up.

Give up why? Explain why we should give up? Rather then twisting our words, changing the subject and calling us trolls; explain this to us. By the way, the SUV driver is 100% innocent, any action he had came about after being provoked by the 25+ bikers.

Only in America would people get away with crippling someone.

Only in America would someone get away with self-defense like this. I don't know how you feel sympathy for this guy, think about everything else that is happening in the U.S and the world. Sorry to go off topic, but that is extremely weird.

Moby wrote All of those 3 things you have misinterpreted.

1. No one said the bikers tried to do it for insurance purposes. People COMPARED the stop to something someone WOULD do in a situation where it was for insurance purposes.
2. I haven't attacked your grammar, BigWes did because you called him a kid. So who is really in the wrong there?
3. Dunder said you never go outside because you seem to have no knowledge of how things work, you seem to have no knowledge of a fight or flight reaction or how bikes and cars are supposed to behave on a road, it was a sarcastic comment, get over it.

It's not finding little 'nuggets' it's providing new material.
Just because this has been going on for a while doesn't make what we're saying any less valid.

An attack refers to emotional or physical abuse, this is a common definition, just because YOU specifically usually see it used in reference to physical attacks doesn't mean it can't also and doesn't also refer to emotional attacks.

I'm not the only who would see the word ''attack'' on a news story and think it's physical, stop getting all technical.

I have countered most thing you've said, as you have with what I've said, that's a fact for you.

Again, I never came up with it being an insurance fraud. I stated that it was comparable to one how they set it up. I can also say that the guy getting ran over is comparable to a speed bump, but that doesn't mean he is one or tried to be one. All in all, biker stopped short in the middle of the road, SUV gave a tap on the back because the biker was being stupid, the bikers trap the man, they try and act like Batman by chasing him down, and then they beat him in front of wife and kid. It's 100% the bikers fault. They did nothing that was common sense or legal. The SUV had one accident that wasn't their fault and used self defense to get out of there.

BigWes wrote

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote

HyperViper wrote

BigWes wrote Why would I give up to a hard-headed idiot who thinks he has proven this argument with no legitimate facts.

I have countered everything you've said with facts, opinions, and common sense. You failed early on so resorted to attacking my grammar and myself in real life just like you little trolls do.

Give up.

Give up why? Explain why we should give up? Rather then twisting our words, changing the subject and calling us trolls; explain this to us. By the way, the SUV driver is 100% innocent, any action he had came about after being provoked by the 25+ bikers.

Only in America would people get away with crippling someone.

Only in America would someone get away with self-defense like this. I don't know how you feel sympathy for this guy, think about everything else that is happening in the U.S and the world. Sorry to go off topic, but that is extremely weird.

In America anyone with half a brain can buy a gun, hence the stupidly high death rate from guns and the reason for so many shootings, the laws are moronic, but let's not get in to that shall we.