You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,893
Reputation Power: 105
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,893
Reputation Power: 105
Ironsights6667 wrote I agree, with what you're sayig about playing it for a few hours. However, you can't sit and defend it too much.
I'm not saying it's a bad game, I just think they could have changed more stuff than they have. In my opinion it just feels like a dlc for battlefield 3.
Yeah it runs smoother but its not worth paying 32.99 for it, I'm sorry but this is the truth.
I think it is worth the price as i think it is as better than BF3. You could just say the same thing about Call of Duty, It doesn't change much and in my opinion it is getting worse every year.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 836
Reputation Power: 35
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 836
Reputation Power: 35
This game is new and fun it is on a maxed out console the 360 itll be better on xbone, but this is a brand new game, this is how i expected with newer features, i assume you are a cod fanboy and it happens with all games, new campaign and why fix something thats worked before.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,631
Reputation Power: 152
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,631
Reputation Power: 152
If he was a cod fanboy then do you really think he would be complaining about games being repetitive...
That's just the nature games like this, If it's not broken then don't fix it.
That's just the nature games like this, If it's not broken then don't fix it.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 952
Reputation Power: 35
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 952
Reputation Power: 35
Ironsights6667 wrote I agree, with what you're sayig about playing it for a few hours. However, you can't sit and defend it too much.
I'm not saying it's a bad game, I just think they could have changed more stuff than they have. In my opinion it just feels like a dlc for battlefield 3.
Yeah it runs smoother but its not worth paying 32.99 for it, I'm sorry but this is the truth.
Well then sell it, there is no point complaining about the game. Go buy something else that you will actually enjoy. In my opinion Bf4 is amazing and the graphics are out of this world especially on Pc/Xbox One/Ps4.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,836
Reputation Power: 340
YES bf4 is such a let down to me, ok im a huge fan of really EA games as a whole. But i really love the battlefields from 1942-bf3. ALL OF THEM!! Best series hands down, i pre ordered bf4 the FIRST day it was available to pre order and I was the first person to pre order it at m gamestop. I love battlefield. Bf4 is such a let down, aside from smoothness and maps and SOME guns they didnt really change as much as I had intended them on changing. It feels and looks and really plays just like bf3, which isnt bad but it is boring. I already traded it back in. Dont get me wrong its a good game... for people who have only played like bf3 and maybe a little bfbc2.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,324
Reputation Power: 554
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,324
Reputation Power: 554
I love these topics...
This is coming from a person that was a Battlefield 1942 player.(Not that quicky 1943 one)
Ok First off they improved the sound in this game big time, since in BF3 they were using the Frostbite 2 Engine. BF4 is using the Frostbite 3 engine. Now with this one. mostly everything can be knocked down now. Compared to BF3, a ton more stuff can be destroyed. Graphics look a bit better. Theyve added the whole swimming aspect. New guns, maps, the maps can majorly change throughout gameplay. More epic of a campaign(too bad its short). I dont care if it feels like BF3, that was a very good game so why change it? I hate seeing people say its feels the same. Since somebody said something about COD. What about Gears of War? Gears of War 1 feels the same way playing Gears of War Judgement. But its still an amazing game, people buy it. If its not for you, then get rid of it. It will be a win win situation. We BF4 players dont want to hear online "This game sucks!" muitple times while we are trying to win the game. Theres my little rant.
This is coming from a person that was a Battlefield 1942 player.(Not that quicky 1943 one)
- 2useful
- 1not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,336
Reputation Power: 211
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,336
Reputation Power: 211
It's only a step up if you change from the 360/PS3 to the Xbox One/PS4/PC.
60fps paired with 64 man servers will make an incredible change to Battlefield on console, you'll never want to go back.
60fps paired with 64 man servers will make an incredible change to Battlefield on console, you'll never want to go back.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 04, 201212Year Member
Posts: 319
Reputation Power: 12
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 04, 201212Year Member
Posts: 319
Reputation Power: 12
Sadly it is the same game as BF3 with minor tweaks, I will only be playing single player and team deathmatch
- 1useful
- 2not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 183
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 183
Reputation Power: 6
SLD wrote 1. How can you criticise a game after playing it for a few hours?
2. They have changed a lot in my opinion, just because you move the same and some of the guns stay the same doesn't mean that it's another BF3.
I bet this guys is one of those noobs with an lmg just camping in the same spot hahaha
and actually it doesnt feel like bt3 but i wouldnt expect you to know the difference
just go back to COD
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201014Year Member
Posts: 302
Reputation Power: 12
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201014Year Member
Posts: 302
Reputation Power: 12
Dragify wroteIronsights6667 wrote I agree, with what you're sayig about playing it for a few hours. However, you can't sit and defend it too much.
I'm not saying it's a bad game, I just think they could have changed more stuff than they have. In my opinion it just feels like a dlc for battlefield 3.
Yeah it runs smoother but its not worth paying 32.99 for it, I'm sorry but this is the truth.
Well then sell it, there is no point complaining about the game. Go buy something else that you will actually enjoy. In my opinion Bf4 is amazing and the graphics are out of this world especially on Pc/Xbox One/Ps4.
Nice Profile pic
Personally i think the graphics are awesome (not a major improvement on bf3 but makes up in the amount of destruction). The single player part of the game i find abit annoying atm. I'm on a mission where the enemy has grenade launchers; and even when i hide behind rocks because of the snipers they always still get me, oh and there seems to be an unlimited amount of enemys popping out of no-where to surpise me and send me back to the checkpoint which is really annoying
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.