BF4 is a more real kind of shooter. Large maps, more strategic, that sort of thing. Requires more skill to get good at, longer games, and specializing. Specializing as in some people are really really good at 1-2 things, like flying jets, while some can get 30 kills per game and get shot down once. Most can only get 0-1 kill and go down 5 times. Some are good AR people some are good snipers, etc.

CoD is more an arcade shooter. Run and Gun kind of thing. Don't argue with me about OBJ game modes. You can Run and Gun in SnD, Dom, Demo, Cap the flag less some but still. There is a strategy to it. But it's really just run and gun in different parts of the map and knowing where to go.

BF4 may be "more realistic" but COD has my vote and always will

I my opinion bf4 is ten times better then cod and that's coming from a previous cod fan boy lol. Battlefield is way more realistic and way more fun cause the games are longer and it has huge maps

I'm not biased in anyway whatsoever but Battlefield is superior in every characteristic when compared to a game such as CoD, the CoD franchise has been dying for a while now... sorry to offend all you CoD fanboys.

I feel if battlefield was more fast paced and more of my friends got it, it would be a game I could enjoy. Call of duty is the game that has more people on it that I want to play with and allows me to hop in, run around and get some kills and have fun when I can.

To me, they are kind of hard to compare because each game offers a different experience.

I use to be a huge Call of Duty person but within the last year I have been finding that I enjoy playing Battlefield a lot more than Cod.

I honestly don't like when people compare the 2 shooters. Both of them are great games with very different experiences. And most of the time when you compare them most of the comments are extremely biased written by angry 12 year olds. However I seem to see that there are actually more Battlefield fanboys than CoD fanboys. All I really see in the comments about Battlefield are that "Maps are bigger", "has vehicles" and "the graphics are better". The graphics really don't matter. It's all about the gameplay. Also giant maps and vehicles aren't all that. Battlefield isn't fun when there is a level 100 spawncamping in a heli. CoD also has it's flaws such as the community, repetitiveness and servers. I honestly can't compare the 2 next to each other. I prefer to point out each games flaws. To be honest I can't decide which is better. I love to play both games as equal.
And lastly I can't stand when people call Battlefield "A Realistic Shooter". Battlefield is nowhere near realistic. Battlefield isn't even comparable to what people go through overseas.
:BLARGH:

Ith games have their positives and negatives but I'll probably stand by cod just because I'm awful at battlefield

Even though I'm not the best at Battlefield, I love playing it more. Even if I die or something, I'm probably laughing at the end. In COD when I die I just get angry because of the ridiculous things you could die by.