You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,315
Reputation Power: 351
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,315
Reputation Power: 351
Realities wroteTerrabytez wroteRealities wrote Yeh the 8320 is a great cpu if youre not playing cpu intensive games if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps
than what u would with the 6320 as AMD added 2 more cores
by splitting all the other cores into another two which taken power from the cores that are important to use
uuh what. You kinda contradicted yourself there...
"AMD added 2 more cores"
"if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps"
OP The 8320 is a great CPU.
The 8350 is the standard overclocked edition
Look at benchmarks 6300 is better st single core programs
and has Better Hyper-Threading than the 8 core because
AMD Broke 2 cores in half and put them as another 2 cores
and named it the 8300 its a rip off as the 6000 series is better
and cheaper
Please educate yourself. HYPERTHREADING is exclusive to INTEL i7 CPU's.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Terrabytez wroteRealities wroteTerrabytez wroteRealities wrote Yeh the 8320 is a great cpu if youre not playing cpu intensive games if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps
than what u would with the 6320 as AMD added 2 more cores
by splitting all the other cores into another two which taken power from the cores that are important to use
uuh what. You kinda contradicted yourself there...
"AMD added 2 more cores"
"if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps"
OP The 8320 is a great CPU.
The 8350 is the standard overclocked edition
Look at benchmarks 6300 is better st single core programs
and has Better Hyper-Threading than the 8 core because
AMD Broke 2 cores in half and put them as another 2 cores
and named it the 8300 its a rip off as the 6000 series is better
and cheaper
Please educate yourself. HYPERTHREADING is exclusive to INTEL i7 CPU's.
To correct myself i mean Single Threaded Programs!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,622
Reputation Power: 346
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,622
Reputation Power: 346
The AMD Vishera architecture is present on ALL 63XX and 83XX processors, so you wouldn't be getting any performance loss due to any chip changes.
What would be different is core counts, clock speeds and TDP. 63XX models have three modules, with two cores on each making six total cores. The 83XX models have four modules, two on each making eight cores.
What would be different is core counts, clock speeds and TDP. 63XX models have three modules, with two cores on each making six total cores. The 83XX models have four modules, two on each making eight cores.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Buxtyy wrote The AMD Vishera architecture is present on ALL 63XX and 83XX processors, so you wouldn't be getting any performance loss due to any chip changes.
What would be different is core counts, clock speeds and TDP. 63XX models have three modules, with two cores on each making six total cores. The 83XX models have four modules, two on each making eight cores.
The 83XX series is good but if i was building a AMD build i would go for 63xx series
as its better at single threading performance and no game runs all 8 cores
so allot of power of the CPU is left un used i would get the amd 83XX series
if i was building and Editing/Multimedia PC as it can use more power from
Those extra cores and can actually be better than intel in some programs
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,315
Reputation Power: 351
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,315
Reputation Power: 351
Realities wroteBuxtyy wrote The AMD Vishera architecture is present on ALL 63XX and 83XX processors, so you wouldn't be getting any performance loss due to any chip changes.
What would be different is core counts, clock speeds and TDP. 63XX models have three modules, with two cores on each making six total cores. The 83XX models have four modules, two on each making eight cores.
The 83XX series is good but if i was building a AMD build i would go for 63xx series
as its better at single threading performance and no game runs all 8 cores
so allot of power of the CPU is left un used i would get the amd 83XX series
if i was building and Editing/Multimedia PC as it can use more power from
Those extra cores and can actually be better than intel in some programs
But if i was editing or doing multimedia work I would use Intel i7 3770K...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Terrabytez wroteRealities wroteBuxtyy wrote The AMD Vishera architecture is present on ALL 63XX and 83XX processors, so you wouldn't be getting any performance loss due to any chip changes.
What would be different is core counts, clock speeds and TDP. 63XX models have three modules, with two cores on each making six total cores. The 83XX models have four modules, two on each making eight cores.
The 83XX series is good but if i was building a AMD build i would go for 63xx series
as its better at single threading performance and no game runs all 8 cores
so allot of power of the CPU is left un used i would get the amd 83XX series
if i was building and Editing/Multimedia PC as it can use more power from
Those extra cores and can actually be better than intel in some programs
But if i was editing or doing multimedia work I would use Intel i7 3770K...
not everyone has the money to spend on that kind of processor
youre basically saying my sister would buy a i7 3700k pc for her homework
when its total overkill lol
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,315
Reputation Power: 351
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,315
Reputation Power: 351
No i'm not. What I am saying is that if i were doing a course at either college or uni or a job, I would use an Intel CPU. for homework then amd is fine. but if you want to excel and do the best that you can, Intel is the way to go. If not an i7, an i5 would be better. especially the 4670(K)
- 2useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.