You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
The_Road_To_WW3 wroteLavish wroteactually its like 3 cops + security> armed teachers. Most students would not want to be in a room with a teacher with a weapon. You would be surprised at how mad teachers can get at students. I would be fine with a taser but an armed weapon is too far. It should be police armed + Taser teachers lol.The_Road_To_WW3 wrote No, this is why there is police at (most) schools. Having armed teachers is just as dangerous as having armed kids in a school.
How do you figure that?
Teachers would go through training that is much more in depth than the standard concealed carry along with many psychiatric tests.
15 Trained and armed teachers > 1 cop
Most schools don't have 3 cops and armed security.
Tazers is a worse idea than a gun.
A teacher would be a lot more likely to use a non lethal tazer on a student rather than a lethal gun.
Teachers get mad but how often do they actually kill a student in a classroom?
- 3useful
- 1not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 24
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 24
G3MSIncrested wroteWell than my friend there is your problem. Case solvedThe_Road_To_WW3 wrote No, this is why there is police at (most) schools. Having armed teachers is just as dangerous as having armed kids in a school.That's the thing though my city doesn't have police. We have the County Sheriffs and stuff but there throughout the county. Also I'm pretty sure our county is the biggest in CO if not one of them.
- 1useful
- 2not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,181
Reputation Power: 47
The_Road_To_WW3 wroteLavish wroteactually its like 3 cops + security> armed teachers. Most students would not want to be in a room with a teacher with a weapon. You would be surprised at how mad teachers can get at students. I would be fine with a taser but an armed weapon is too far. It should be police armed + Taser teachers lol.The_Road_To_WW3 wrote No, this is why there is police at (most) schools. Having armed teachers is just as dangerous as having armed kids in a school.
How do you figure that?
Teachers would go through training that is much more in depth than the standard concealed carry along with many psychiatric tests.
15 Trained and armed teachers > 1 cop
My school only has one cop............
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 492
Reputation Power: 20
I think this is a great idea!
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 08, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,544
Reputation Power: 206
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 08, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,544
Reputation Power: 206
I personally say no, there's almost no need if they could carry something like pepper spray.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
FlutterBat wrote I personally say no, there's almost no need if they could carry something like pepper spray.
Pepper spray isn't going to put someone down that is on drugs rather just piss them off even more.
- 2useful
- 1not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 24
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 24
FlutterBat wrote I personally say no, there's almost no need if they could carry something like pepper spray.Thats exactly what I think. If people claim that teachers would be more likely to use a less severe weapon on innocent students then those teachers should not have them at all. There should be a 0 chance for weapons used on innocent students.
- 1useful
- 2not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
The_Road_To_WW3 wrote If people claim that teachers would be more likely to use a less severe weapon on innocent students then those teachers should not have them at all.
I could say the EXACT same thing as to what you said about armed teachers.
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 24
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 24
Lavish wroteI don't support armed teachers. Thats just asking for accidents but if there was a MUST have then it should not be a gun.The_Road_To_WW3 wrote If people claim that teachers would be more likely to use a less severe weapon on innocent students then those teachers should not have them at all.
I could say the EXACT same thing as to what you said about armed teachers.
- 1useful
- 3not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,181
Reputation Power: 47
Lavish wroteThe_Road_To_WW3 wrote If people claim that teachers would be more likely to use a less severe weapon on innocent students then those teachers should not have them at all.
I could say the EXACT same thing as to what you said about armed teachers.
No teacher will shoot a kid because they got him mad or got a question wrong.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.