You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#31. Posted:
Deceit
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,334
Reputation Power: 201
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,334
Reputation Power: 201
Typical responses consist of "they're hiding something" but to be honest I don't think your numbers are correct in a sense. I'm sure we've been back, just not for a mission. The Apollo missions were all engineered to bring something back or something of the sort. I'm sure small research missions have gone up.
#32. Posted:
CarlyRaeJepsen
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 06, 201311Year Member
Posts: 404
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 06, 201311Year Member
Posts: 404
Reputation Power: 16
I'm sure they just lost the HYPE because Ronald Reagan just wanted to keep the Vietnam War off the American peoples mind.
#33. Posted:
MGS
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201311Year Member
Posts: 444
Reputation Power: 25
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201311Year Member
Posts: 444
Reputation Power: 25
Lavish wrote It cost about $150 Billion in todays money to go to the moon.

There is no point in spending that kind of money on going somewhere humans have already been.
That is why we are investing the money into the mars missions.

I'm sorry but that is a very over ambitious figure... At the minute it costs around $100,000 to send about 500 pounds of materials into space, it would only cost around $3 billion to actually go to the moon...
#34. Posted:
Rap-Pup
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 28, 201410Year Member
Posts: 97
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 28, 201410Year Member
Posts: 97
Reputation Power: 4
We went once, accomplished the goal, and don't really need to again
#35. Posted:
1gb
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 1,012
Reputation Power: 46
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 1,012
Reputation Power: 46
Possibly they dont like cheese? jk.
I think they saw some things up there and they dont want to risk sending anyone else up.
#36. Posted:
Cen
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 29, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,637
Reputation Power: 70
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 29, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,637
Reputation Power: 70
Lavish wrote It cost about $150 Billion in todays money to go to the moon.

There is no point in spending that kind of money on going somewhere humans have already been.
That is why we are investing the money into the mars missions.


I don't think that's true at all. NASA's annual budget hovers around 17 billion.
#37. Posted:
Georgasm
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,336
Reputation Power: 211
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,336
Reputation Power: 211
I'd imagine everything we need to know about the moon, we know. Therefore there is no reason to spend money to travel there.
#38. Posted:
Tywin
  • Gold Gifter
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Cen wrote
Lavish wrote It cost about $150 Billion in todays money to go to the moon.

There is no point in spending that kind of money on going somewhere humans have already been.
That is why we are investing the money into the mars missions.


I don't think that's true at all. NASA's annual budget hovers around 17 billion.


You proved my point for me as to why we don't go back to the moon, lol.
#39. Posted:
Rap-Pup
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 28, 201410Year Member
Posts: 97
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 28, 201410Year Member
Posts: 97
Reputation Power: 4
Lavish wrote
Cen wrote
Lavish wrote It cost about $150 Billion in todays money to go to the moon.

There is no point in spending that kind of money on going somewhere humans have already been.
That is why we are investing the money into the mars missions.


I don't think that's true at all. NASA's annual budget hovers around 17 billion.


You proved my point for me as to why we don't go back to the moon, lol.


No because it costs nowhere near that much to go to the moon lol, we don't go back because nasa is shut down and there's not point anymore
#40. Posted:
Brad
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
We've explored it already, now we have more places to explore!
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.