Photogenic wrote

x3ternal_HavocX wrote I like the second one a lot better and so that's the one all this is directed towards (also I'm honestly pretty god awful at logos myself, so take what I have to say with a grain of salt)

Overall the idea is great, clean, and pretty professional. However, I don't like the font choice. I think a thinner font without the line "strike-through" would look better. To go with this, the underline should probably also be thinner.

I get what your saying bro. Choosing the correct font is not a strong point of mine haha. I was searching so long for what I thought was the correct font. I think I should make the underline the same size as the strike through, I think it would make it more even if you know what I mean.

The biggest problem with that would be the size of the "A" it would be a lot thinner than the rest of the letters (if I understand you correct). If you could find a way around that then it'd look great.

x3ternal_HavocX wrote

Photogenic wrote

x3ternal_HavocX wrote I like the second one a lot better and so that's the one all this is directed towards (also I'm honestly pretty god awful at logos myself, so take what I have to say with a grain of salt)

Overall the idea is great, clean, and pretty professional. However, I don't like the font choice. I think a thinner font without the line "strike-through" would look better. To go with this, the underline should probably also be thinner.

I get what your saying bro. Choosing the correct font is not a strong point of mine haha. I was searching so long for what I thought was the correct font. I think I should make the underline the same size as the strike through, I think it would make it more even if you know what I mean.

The biggest problem with that would be the size of the "A" it would be a lot thinner than the rest of the letters (if I understand you correct). If you could find a way around that then it'd look great.

Yes I understand you man. I might do a little font search tomarrow lol.

Pin wrote I didn't like the first one, it looks amateurish. The second one is a definite improvement and works well as a logo. If there's one thing that could be improved, it could be the spacing between the bottom of the letters and the line. Try making the base line a little thinner , so the gap between the bottom of the letters and the line is the same as the other gap (the strikethrough on the text). You should also make it in vector format.

Great work, looking forward to seeing more.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Photogenic wrote

Pin wrote I didn't like the first one, it looks amateurish. The second one is a definite improvement and works well as a logo. If there's one thing that could be improved, it could be the spacing between the bottom of the letters and the line. Try making the base line a little thinner , so the gap between the bottom of the letters and the line is the same as the other gap (the strikethrough on the text). You should also make it in vector format.

Great work, looking forward to seeing more.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Looking at this makes me wonder how it would look if you "bumped" the strike-through (like how the A is done) at the I as well (so the strike-through would go up into the top part of the I, but leave a triangle beneath)

I took what you said and tried doing it but it looked weird, i think its because the dot in the "i" is too small, but it was creative thinking!