You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 27, 201310Year Member
Posts: 695
Reputation Power: 36
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 27, 201310Year Member
Posts: 695
Reputation Power: 36
How can the security even allow people like this to get onto the site?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201410Year Member
Posts: 7
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201410Year Member
Posts: 7
Reputation Power: 0
Dazeo wrote How can the security even allow people like this to get onto the site?
Simple. Here's the predicament.
How does one tell the difference between a Muslim terrorist and a non-violent Muslim. You wait for one of them to start killing people, then you know.
This whack-a-mole reactionary strat is the main method, needless to say it's not a very good method. Then after the fact the politicians remain PC about it.
The official statement read something like, the motivations were 'ideological and political'.......... everybody knows why this man done this. When everybody goes home at night and talks about this, if only to themselves, the will admit it was because of Islam. It's the main contributing factor.
Yet nobody can say it allowed in public, that's when you know they've got you by the gonads. When they can have pro-Hamas and anti-free speech rallies and people like this spawning from their communities and you daren't mention the concept of social responsibility. Let alone be critical of the religion causing this problem.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 27, 201310Year Member
Posts: 695
Reputation Power: 36
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 27, 201310Year Member
Posts: 695
Reputation Power: 36
You fight a good argument
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.