Looks MW to me, but if it says Field Tested it's Field Tested haha

It looks like FT to me. Not even that bad.

Prohibit wrote It looks like FT to me. Not even that bad.

it was a nice pull for sure, it's filed tested but it has a nicer look to the others when i researched it on the store that was all, maybe i'm just tired

From my understanding no two guns are a like. As in if you have 2 of the same guns that are the same wear they won't look the same. So it could say Feild Tested but, look better or worse.

GT-R wrote From my understanding no two guns are a like. As in if you have 2 of the same guns that are the same wear they won't look the same. So it could say Feild Tested but, look better or worse.

Thank you for clearing that up! i'm still pretty new to this game and mostly ask my friends if i have a question etc but they aren't around right now xD

WolfShock wrote

GT-R wrote From my understanding no two guns are a like. As in if you have 2 of the same guns that are the same wear they won't look the same. So it could say Feild Tested but, look better or worse.

Thank you for clearing that up! i'm still pretty new to this game and mostly ask my friends if i have a question etc but they aren't around right now xD

Even though a skin says it's a quality, it can actually look better than it does or worse than it does. Once you get into trading, you'll sometimes see people say something like "FT Vulcan for trade, looks MW." That means it is "Field Tested" yet, it's actual condition is that of a standard Minimal Wear and vice-versa. You could have a MW skin, that looks FT. An example of a FT gun that looks MW, is my AK-47 Redline.



Now it says it's FT, but it holds an MW look, one of the cleanest I've seen in a while, the only wear and tear is on the tip of the stock and on the trigger, other than that, I have yet to see any wear on it.

If you ever get into trading, especially knives, if someone claims to have a skin that is better looking than what it's quality is, inspect it in game first to make sure they're not lying and trying to basically scam you.

that doesnt look that bad for field tested lol

ShadowBoltDashie wrote

WolfShock wrote

GT-R wrote From my understanding no two guns are a like. As in if you have 2 of the same guns that are the same wear they won't look the same. So it could say Feild Tested but, look better or worse.

Thank you for clearing that up! i'm still pretty new to this game and mostly ask my friends if i have a question etc but they aren't around right now xD

Even though a skin says it's a quality, it can actually look better than it does or worse than it does. Once you get into trading, you'll sometimes see people say something like "FT Vulcan for trade, looks MW." That means it is "Field Tested" yet, it's actual condition is that of a standard Minimal Wear and vice-versa. You could have a MW skin, that looks FT. An example of a FT gun that looks MW, is my AK-47 Redline.

Click to View Content

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Now it says it's FT, but it holds an MW look, one of the cleanest I've seen in a while, the only wear and tear is on the tip of the stock and on the trigger, other than that, I have yet to see any wear on it.

If you ever get into trading, especially knives, if someone claims to have a skin that is better looking than what it's quality is, inspect it in game first to make sure they're not lying and trying to basically scam you.

thank you for your information! i would rep but currently i can not lol

Geb wrote that doesnt look that bad for field tested lol

yes, i thought it looked a lot better than field tested aesthetically