You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Was the Sandy Hook shooting organized by the Government?
Posted:

Was the Sandy Hook shooting organized by the Government?Posted:

Fluxxieee
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 20159Year Member
Posts: 13
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 20159Year Member
Posts: 13
Reputation Power: 0
I mean, it sounds kinda dumb, but think about it. Most everyone in the government wants our guns gone. What better way than to go shoot up a school? Maybe it wasn't someone in government who shot it up, but maybe they paid off the shooter.
#2. Posted:
Dinkleberg
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,904
Reputation Power: 527
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,904
Reputation Power: 527
Honestly, this is not a smart thread at all. I dont think the government would set up a "fake" school shooting and kill kids. It just doesnt add up. Especially for gun control.
Kiss me if im wrong, but our government wouldnt go through THAT much trouble.
#3. Posted:
Tywin
  • 1000 Thanks
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Gun control has taken no leaps forward after Sandy Hook.
If it was a false flag, they did a piss poor job.

The only solid proof of false flag attempts to further gun control were the released emails regarding the ATF's Fast and Furious operation where they talked about being able to use the inflated gun violence statistics from the results of their gun walking program.
#4. Posted:
Fluxxieee
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 20159Year Member
Posts: 13
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 20159Year Member
Posts: 13
Reputation Power: 0
vDubbzy wrote Honestly, this is not a smart thread at all. I dont think the government would set up a "fake" school shooting and kill kids. It just doesnt add up. Especially for gun control.
Kiss me if im wrong, but our government wouldnt go through THAT much trouble.

When did I say it was a fake shooting? I just said that they paid someone off to kill them. .-.
#5. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • Blind Luck
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Adam Lanza killed himself so he wasn't 'paid off.'
Not everyone in the Government wants guns gone. [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

What better way than to go shoot up a school?
This wasn't the first school shooting. People went crazy after Columbine and others as well, and nothing came of it.
Why would they bother trying a method which has already failed to ignite enough outrage?

The question should be: "After Sandy Hook is there anything else that could happen which would make pro-gun advocates drop their stance?"

I don't know if you can realistically get much worse than the deaths of 20 children.
#6. Posted:
Tywin
  • Comment King
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Erudite wrote Adam Lanza killed himself so he wasn't 'paid off.'


I don't think for a second that Sandy Hook was a setup, but it wouldn't be hard to make a case for this kid being manipulated by a third party into doing this.

Terrorist organizations use manipulation like that all the time.
#7. Posted:
Fluxxieee
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 20159Year Member
Posts: 13
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 20159Year Member
Posts: 13
Reputation Power: 0
Erudite wrote Adam Lanza killed himself so he wasn't 'paid off.'
Not everyone in the Government wants guns gone. [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

What better way than to go shoot up a school?
This wasn't the first school shooting. People went crazy after Columbine and others as well, and nothing came of it.
Why would they bother trying a method which has already failed to ignite enough outrage?

The question should be: "After Sandy Hook is there anything else that could happen which would make pro-gun advocates drop their stance?"

I don't know if you can realistically get much worse than the deaths of 20 children.

Maybe the government killed him? -X-Files music-
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.