Lavish wrote

ikhalifaai wrote I'll give this a read which will take a while but the first link I clicked it's just attacking Alex Jones, would not be surprised in the slightest if someone from the government wrote this.

Where do you see them attacking Alex Jones?
Alex Jones complimented them and they featured it on their website with no added comment.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

If you're referring to the WTC 7 link, that is not attacking.
That is debunking a claim. There were no personal attacks at him.

Where it says "frequently asked questions."

I cannot see Alex Jones complimenting whoever made this, it goes against what he says.

"It's hard to find a single page on Alex Jones web sites which doesn't ask for money in some way or another." Is that not attacking him?

There's more but here they're calling him a money grabber basically, is this not attacking him?

EDIT : I just want to add, the picture of the title you showed me isn't him complimenting them, to me it looks like he's saying it is the government that's made it basically.

ikhalifaai wrote "It's hard to find a single page on Alex Jones web sites which doesn't ask for money in some way or another." Is that not attacking him?

There's more but here they're calling him a money grabber basically, is this not attacking him?

That's not attacking him. It's making an observation.

It's like seeing a fat person walk by and you say "He's fat" and then me saying that you just verbally attacked him.


Edit: Even if it was the government who made that website, which it wasn't, that still doesn't change the fact that everything on there is true.

Lavish wrote

ikhalifaai wrote "It's hard to find a single page on Alex Jones web sites which doesn't ask for money in some way or another." Is that not attacking him?

There's more but here they're calling him a money grabber basically, is this not attacking him?

That's not attacking him. It's making an observation.

It's like seeing a fat person walk by and you say "He's fat" and then me saying that you just verbally attacked him.


Edit: Even if it was the government who made that website, which it wasn't, that still doesn't change the fact that everything on there is true.

If you call someone fat in front of the public is that not verbally attacking them? Could I go up to a fat person call them fat to their face and then take the high ground and say I was making an observation? No, well I could but it wouldn't be right.

Here's another quote, "He was as successful in that endeavor as he was on the radio back then. 9/11 seems to be his new piggy bank."

Now that's not an observation, they're implying he's using the 9/11 conspiracy theories as a way to make money. That's pretty twisted imo.

EDIT : I'm still trying to read it all, there's quite a lot. I'm almost certain they'll be loopholes and two things that come to my mind that they won't cover.

ikhalifaai wrote Here's another quote, "He was as successful in that endeavor as he was on the radio back then. 9/11 seems to be his new piggy bank."

Now that's not an observation, they're implying he's using the 9/11 conspiracy theories as a way to make money. That's pretty twisted imo.

That's not only just an observation, but it's a fact.
If you've spent a single second on Infowars you know they profit from any and every sort of terrorist attack, political scandal, etc.

Lavish wrote

ikhalifaai wrote Here's another quote, "He was as successful in that endeavor as he was on the radio back then. 9/11 seems to be his new piggy bank."

Now that's not an observation, they're implying he's using the 9/11 conspiracy theories as a way to make money. That's pretty twisted imo.

That's not only just an observation, but it's a fact.
If you've spent a single second on Infowars you know they profit from any and every sort of terrorist attack, political scandal, etc.

Yes because that's what they talk about, it's a news show. That means every media outlet in the world have made money talking about it then, if 9/11 didn't happen Infowars would be talking about something else and so would other media outlets.

You wouldn't see someone attacking Fox, CNN, BBC etc talking about 9/11, so why attack Alex Jones?

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Now please try to tell me this parasite doesn't exploit tragedy.

1 T-Shirt, a bumper sticker and 5 books, all around $20 or less is hardly exploiting tragedies.

He doesn't get funding like other news outlets so he's well within his rights to sell merchandise to continue his shows, websites etc..

The government are the ones who exploit people, the US Government created Al-Qauda, it's a known fact, Hilary Clinton has admitted this as well. The same supposed terrorist group that was behind 9/11 allegedly. The same terrorist group the US have been supposedly fighting whilst tax payers money help "fight" them. It's all a complete sham.

ikhalifaai wrote 1 T-Shirt, a bumper sticker and 5 books, all around $20 or less is hardly exploiting tragedies.

I can't tell if you're joking or not.

ikhalifaai wrote He doesn't get funding like other news outlets so he's well within his rights to sell merchandise to continue his shows, websites etc..

You're admitting that he's exploiting tragedy but sugar coating it as if he has to in order to stay afloat.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

ikhalifaai wrote The government are the ones who exploit people, the US Government created Al-Qauda, it's a known fact, Hilary Clinton has admitted this as well. The same supposed terrorist group that was behind 9/11 allegedly. The same terrorist group the US have been supposedly fighting whilst tax payers money help "fight" them. It's all a complete sham.

"The government is the devil, blah blah blah"
Stop victimizing yourself.

Lavish wrote

ikhalifaai wrote 1 T-Shirt, a bumper sticker and 5 books, all around $20 or less is hardly exploiting tragedies.

I can't tell if you're joking or not.

ikhalifaai wrote He doesn't get funding like other news outlets so he's well within his rights to sell merchandise to continue his shows, websites etc..

You're admitting that he's exploiting tragedy but sugar coating it as if he has to in order to stay afloat.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

ikhalifaai wrote The government are the ones who exploit people, the US Government created Al-Qauda, it's a known fact, Hilary Clinton has admitted this as well. The same supposed terrorist group that was behind 9/11 allegedly. The same terrorist group the US have been supposedly fighting whilst tax payers money help "fight" them. It's all a complete sham.

"The government is the devil, blah blah blah"
Stop victimizing yourself.

People buy books, people read. Selling books isn't exploiting tragedies. As for the T-Shirts I don't know why you'd sell them, raise awareness, I don't know, don't really care. He's made nothing in the grand scheme of things.

I like how you completely avoid my last comment. Why is that? Why did the US create Al-Qauda? Fund them? Why would they do that? I bet a lot of people didn't even know that. Why don't they know that? Because mainstream media, the ones funded by the US government don't cover it, don't talk about it. They dictate what you see, what you believe and anyone that's smart enough to see what they're doing are considered nutjob conspiracy theorists because you've been brainwashed to think that way.

There was an advert that had sirens and warnings about martial law in the background sounds, just shows the brainwashing that goes on.

ikhalifaai wrote I like how you completely avoid my last comment. Why is that? Why did the US create Al-Qauda? Fund them? Why would they do that? I bet a lot of people didn't even know that. Why don't they know that? Because mainstream media, the ones funded by the US government don't cover it, don't talk about it. They dictate what you see, what you believe and anyone that's smart enough to see what they're doing are considered nutjob conspiracy theorists because you've been brainwashed to think that way.

There was an advert that had sirens and warnings about martial law in the background sounds, just shows the brainwashing that goes on.

'

The government didn't create Al-Qauda. They funded them before they were a terrorist organization, when they were only a group of rebels helping us take down the soviet union.