You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 152
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 152
Reputation Power: 5
Audi s5 are sleek! Cts-v is a monster. c6 zo6 corvette have a lot of buddys that have them. new mustang 5.0 there is a lot of cars to choose from its really just what you like.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#22. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,304
Reputation Power: 423
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,304
Reputation Power: 423
002 wroteTURB0 wrote002 wrote Plain and simple, cars are not investments. They loose value as soon as they roll off the lot. The only way you could truely invest in a vehicle is getting a really old one that they don't make anymore (that was popular) and keep it in good shape. These would be like your '78-'79 Ford Bronco's, COPO Camaros, etc.
You don't want a rust bucket Ford, and they'll hardly go up in value.
I would say a classic Porsche 911, they seem to go up a lot and are sports.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Fords of the 70's aren't really rust buckets unless you dump them in a river and leave them there. That title is mainly for Dodge. Chevy has it's issue with rust on the cab corners, and the late 90's Ford trucks have a rust problem on their rocker panels, but for the most part Dodge rusts everywhere.
Ford Bronco's where popular, and they stopped production in 1996. This body style was only made for two years, '78 and '79.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Not only that, but you can pick these up cheap and work on them for pretty cheap. Pick up an old Porsche and expect to spend a few extra bucks, or prepare to be spending a fortune restoring it.
Im going to disagree with you I had a 73 ford with rust everywhere and it wasn't dumped in the river either
So your logic on fords not rusting a lot is very bad cause I see rusted f150-f250's and broncos rusted out all the time. 70's-90's fords are always rusty
Now dodges the only bad thing about them are paint jobs and there shitty transmissions not rust
And chevy's I have never seen a 70 - any other year with body rust
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#23. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 24, 20159Year Member
Posts: 16
Reputation Power: 0
invest in vintage if its rare enough in 10 years it could become priceless
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#24. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 4,817
Reputation Power: 7349
GMC wrote002 wroteTURB0 wrote002 wrote Plain and simple, cars are not investments. They loose value as soon as they roll off the lot. The only way you could truely invest in a vehicle is getting a really old one that they don't make anymore (that was popular) and keep it in good shape. These would be like your '78-'79 Ford Bronco's, COPO Camaros, etc.
You don't want a rust bucket Ford, and they'll hardly go up in value.
I would say a classic Porsche 911, they seem to go up a lot and are sports.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Fords of the 70's aren't really rust buckets unless you dump them in a river and leave them there. That title is mainly for Dodge. Chevy has it's issue with rust on the cab corners, and the late 90's Ford trucks have a rust problem on their rocker panels, but for the most part Dodge rusts everywhere.
Ford Bronco's where popular, and they stopped production in 1996. This body style was only made for two years, '78 and '79.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Not only that, but you can pick these up cheap and work on them for pretty cheap. Pick up an old Porsche and expect to spend a few extra bucks, or prepare to be spending a fortune restoring it.
Im going to disagree with you I had a 73 ford with rust everywhere and it wasn't dumped in the river either
So your logic on fords not rusting a lot is very bad cause I see rusted f150-f250's and broncos rusted out all the time. 70's-90's fords are always rusty
Now dodges the only bad thing about them are paint jobs and there shitty transmissions not rust
And chevy's I have never seen a 70 - any other year with body rust
I'm sure you've never seen a Chevy with rust lol. Where do you live? I assume in the rust belt where they use salt on the roads in winter.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#25. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 200915Year Member
Posts: 5,611
Reputation Power: 254
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 200915Year Member
Posts: 5,611
Reputation Power: 254
Buy a Huracan, Don't put too many miles on it. Wait until your area runs out of Huracans. Sell for 30k more than you bought it. Make profit...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#26. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,304
Reputation Power: 423
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,304
Reputation Power: 423
002 wroteGMC wrote002 wroteTURB0 wrote002 wrote Plain and simple, cars are not investments. They loose value as soon as they roll off the lot. The only way you could truely invest in a vehicle is getting a really old one that they don't make anymore (that was popular) and keep it in good shape. These would be like your '78-'79 Ford Bronco's, COPO Camaros, etc.
You don't want a rust bucket Ford, and they'll hardly go up in value.
I would say a classic Porsche 911, they seem to go up a lot and are sports.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Fords of the 70's aren't really rust buckets unless you dump them in a river and leave them there. That title is mainly for Dodge. Chevy has it's issue with rust on the cab corners, and the late 90's Ford trucks have a rust problem on their rocker panels, but for the most part Dodge rusts everywhere.
Ford Bronco's where popular, and they stopped production in 1996. This body style was only made for two years, '78 and '79.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Not only that, but you can pick these up cheap and work on them for pretty cheap. Pick up an old Porsche and expect to spend a few extra bucks, or prepare to be spending a fortune restoring it.
Im going to disagree with you I had a 73 ford with rust everywhere and it wasn't dumped in the river either
So your logic on fords not rusting a lot is very bad cause I see rusted f150-f250's and broncos rusted out all the time. 70's-90's fords are always rusty
Now dodges the only bad thing about them are paint jobs and there shitty transmissions not rust
And chevy's I have never seen a 70 - any other year with body rust
I'm sure you've never seen a Chevy with rust lol. Where do you live? I assume in the rust belt where they use salt on the roads in winter.
No I live where the roads never see snow nor salt
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#27. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,401
Reputation Power: 5020
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,401
Reputation Power: 5020
I would go for an FRS. If you get a BRZ you will spend an extra 4k just for the Subaru name. You could add a mid size turbo (45mm or so) and drop it on bags for about 6k. The sport model runs about 27k brand new with all the upgrades it would be in the low 30s.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#28. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,645
Reputation Power: 316
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,645
Reputation Power: 316
FRS wrote I would go for an FRS. If you get a BRZ you will spend an extra 4k just for the Subaru name. You could add a mid size turbo (45mm or so) and drop it on bags for about 6k. The sport model runs about 27k brand new with all the upgrades it would be in the low 30s.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Do you know what a investment is? if someone was looking to buy the car in 30 years from now, they would not want it to be ruined. Collectors like OEM parts and good condition engine. He'd be better of getting something from the 70s-80s as they are already becoming classic.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.