ItzJitter wrote

002 wrote I'm a tad bit confused, how did these transactions go down? Did he pay for the food, and you paid him 50% after the fact? Or how did that work? If he called it in and paid for it then you paid him back then it is his problem. How did this transaction work?

I would pay him 50% of the cost through paypal, and he would order the food, then i would pick it up.

Then you are not responsible. He made the financial decision to buy the food, you just picked up something you thought was paid for. I would say you are clear here.

Lol this doesn't make sense why do you owe them if it has already been paid for and you said you go pick up the food?

002 wrote

ItzJitter wrote

002 wrote I'm a tad bit confused, how did these transactions go down? Did he pay for the food, and you paid him 50% after the fact? Or how did that work? If he called it in and paid for it then you paid him back then it is his problem. How did this transaction work?

I would pay him 50% of the cost through paypal, and he would order the food, then i would pick it up.

Then you are not responsible. He made the financial decision to buy the food, you just picked up something you thought was paid for. I would say you are clear here.

He made the criminal decision* to "steal" the food, and the OP accepted stolen goods. It doesn't matter if he didn't know it or not. He would have to return them if it was any other tangible item. Considering he can't return the pizzas, he should pay for them. It's not Dominos fault that the incident occurred, nor is it the OP. The OP was just a victim of a credit card scam. Legally, I'm sure Dominos could make you pay for it, but I doubt they'll go through the hassle of the legal system for $300.

Cokes wrote

002 wrote

ItzJitter wrote

002 wrote I'm a tad bit confused, how did these transactions go down? Did he pay for the food, and you paid him 50% after the fact? Or how did that work? If he called it in and paid for it then you paid him back then it is his problem. How did this transaction work?

I would pay him 50% of the cost through paypal, and he would order the food, then i would pick it up.

Then you are not responsible. He made the financial decision to buy the food, you just picked up something you thought was paid for. I would say you are clear here.

He made the criminal decision* to "steal" the food, and the OP accepted stolen goods. It doesn't matter if he didn't know it or not. He would have to return them if it was any other tangible item. Considering he can't return the pizzas, he should pay for them. It's not Dominos fault that the incident occurred, nor is it the OP. The OP was just a victim of a credit card scam. Legally, I'm sure Dominos could make you pay for it, but I doubt they'll go through the hassle of the legal system for $300.

If he is dumb enough to say he accepted stolen goods. He thought what was going on was legit. They should not be going after him, but rather the person who actually paid for the food.

002 wrote

Cokes wrote

002 wrote

ItzJitter wrote

002 wrote I'm a tad bit confused, how did these transactions go down? Did he pay for the food, and you paid him 50% after the fact? Or how did that work? If he called it in and paid for it then you paid him back then it is his problem. How did this transaction work?

I would pay him 50% of the cost through paypal, and he would order the food, then i would pick it up.

Then you are not responsible. He made the financial decision to buy the food, you just picked up something you thought was paid for. I would say you are clear here.

He made the criminal decision* to "steal" the food, and the OP accepted stolen goods. It doesn't matter if he didn't know it or not. He would have to return them if it was any other tangible item. Considering he can't return the pizzas, he should pay for them. It's not Dominos fault that the incident occurred, nor is it the OP. The OP was just a victim of a credit card scam. Legally, I'm sure Dominos could make you pay for it, but I doubt they'll go through the hassle of the legal system for $300.

If he is dumb enough to say he accepted stolen goods. He thought what was going on was legit. They should not be going after him, but rather the person who actually paid for the food.

He doesn't have to say whether or not he accepted stolen goods, Dominos is already aware of this because the credit card company charged back the payment (which is why they would even contact him in the first place). Because the OP picked the pizzas up, Dominos can go after him for it legally. In that case, it's OP's responsibility to go after the scammer because he accepted the stolen goods. It's not Dominos fault that he didn't know about it. He's just the one to bite the bullet. Chances are the credit card scammer won't be found so the OP will end up paying for it.

No offence but this was complete stupidity, why would anyone ever fall for something like this when you don't even know them.. Try get the pictures, your "friends" vouch, will not do s***.

You bought carded pizzas. Anyone who sells anything ( food, clothing, headphones, etc...) for that big of a discount is using stolen CCs. You accepted stolen goods, so now you are going to have to pay for them.

This was a huge problem on twitter for the longest time with people selling pizza, astros, and monitors. I didnt even know kids still did this.

Cokes wrote

002 wrote

Cokes wrote

002 wrote

ItzJitter wrote

002 wrote I'm a tad bit confused, how did these transactions go down? Did he pay for the food, and you paid him 50% after the fact? Or how did that work? If he called it in and paid for it then you paid him back then it is his problem. How did this transaction work?

I would pay him 50% of the cost through paypal, and he would order the food, then i would pick it up.

Then you are not responsible. He made the financial decision to buy the food, you just picked up something you thought was paid for. I would say you are clear here.

He made the criminal decision* to "steal" the food, and the OP accepted stolen goods. It doesn't matter if he didn't know it or not. He would have to return them if it was any other tangible item. Considering he can't return the pizzas, he should pay for them. It's not Dominos fault that the incident occurred, nor is it the OP. The OP was just a victim of a credit card scam. Legally, I'm sure Dominos could make you pay for it, but I doubt they'll go through the hassle of the legal system for $300.

If he is dumb enough to say he accepted stolen goods. He thought what was going on was legit. They should not be going after him, but rather the person who actually paid for the food.

He doesn't have to say whether or not he accepted stolen goods, Dominos is already aware of this because the credit card company charged back the payment (which is why they would even contact him in the first place). Because the OP picked the pizzas up, Dominos can go after him for it legally. In that case, it's OP's responsibility to go after the scammer because he accepted the stolen goods. It's not Dominos fault that he didn't know about it. He's just the one to bite the bullet. Chances are the credit card scammer won't be found so the OP will end up paying for it.

He would be saying that he did not know he was getting stolen goods beings that he thought what was going on was legit. Domino's I do not believe will get anywhere if they go after him beings that he was just picking up the pizza that was already paid for by another person. That is like going after the delivery boy because the guy he delivered to made a charge back.

002 wrote

Cokes wrote

002 wrote

Cokes wrote

002 wrote

ItzJitter wrote

002 wrote I'm a tad bit confused, how did these transactions go down? Did he pay for the food, and you paid him 50% after the fact? Or how did that work? If he called it in and paid for it then you paid him back then it is his problem. How did this transaction work?

I would pay him 50% of the cost through paypal, and he would order the food, then i would pick it up.

Then you are not responsible. He made the financial decision to buy the food, you just picked up something you thought was paid for. I would say you are clear here.

He made the criminal decision* to "steal" the food, and the OP accepted stolen goods. It doesn't matter if he didn't know it or not. He would have to return them if it was any other tangible item. Considering he can't return the pizzas, he should pay for them. It's not Dominos fault that the incident occurred, nor is it the OP. The OP was just a victim of a credit card scam. Legally, I'm sure Dominos could make you pay for it, but I doubt they'll go through the hassle of the legal system for $300.

If he is dumb enough to say he accepted stolen goods. He thought what was going on was legit. They should not be going after him, but rather the person who actually paid for the food.

He doesn't have to say whether or not he accepted stolen goods, Dominos is already aware of this because the credit card company charged back the payment (which is why they would even contact him in the first place). Because the OP picked the pizzas up, Dominos can go after him for it legally. In that case, it's OP's responsibility to go after the scammer because he accepted the stolen goods. It's not Dominos fault that he didn't know about it. He's just the one to bite the bullet. Chances are the credit card scammer won't be found so the OP will end up paying for it.

He would be saying that he did not know he was getting stolen goods beings that he thought what was going on was legit. Domino's I do not believe will get anywhere if they go after him beings that he was just picking up the pizza that was already paid for by another person. That is like going after the delivery boy because the guy he delivered to made a charge back.

As far as Domino's is concerned, they do not care if he thought it was legit or not. The pizza was not paid for, it was stolen.

Receipt of stolen property, also known as possession of stolen property or possession of stolen goods, occurs whenever you knowingly purchase, obtain, receive or possess any property that you know, or should know, is stolen, intending to keep it from the owner.

The OP knowingly possessed the stolen pizzas at the time he found out they were carded.

He's told us that a guy offered to buy Pizza for 50% off. Here would be a relevant example, which sort of resembles the case of the OP.

Also, if you buy the television from a stranger selling electronics from the back of a van, you are also guilty of the crime because a reasonable person in your situation would suspect the TV was stolen.

Source for quotes: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Legally, Domino's could establish a case against him meaning they can put the blame on him because he's responsible.

Moral of the story: Don't fall for these credit card scams. Don't believe you're able to get away from the cost of damages by putting the blame on the real criminal.

OP: Not really sure if they'll come up to your house and demand the money or send you a letter in the mail stating they're suing you. They might just let it slide as it may not be worth the time.