You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Dating App Hookup Lands Teen on Sex Offender Registry
Posted:
Dating App Hookup Lands Teen on Sex Offender RegistryPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Zach Anderson from Indiana is the latest example of how sex offender registries have been diluted with people who arent sexual predators and dont actually pose a threat to society.
Last December, 19-year-old Anderson went on an an adult dating app called Hot or Not and met a girl who told him she was 17 years old. Anderson crossed state lines to Michigan and the two met up at a playground shortly after their online exchange and had sex. Everything seemed fine until he was greeted by police soon after.
Anderson learned the girl had lied to him about her age, and she was really 14 years old. Anderson was prosecuted for statutory rape, and pleaded guilty with the hope that his clean record would result in leniency by Judge Dennis Wiley. Even though Anderson qualified for the Holmes Youthful trainee Act (HYTA), which would allow him to serve a youthful trainee probationary term the judge wasnt too interested in being lenient.
Even after the girl and her mother both testified that she had lied about her age and that they didnt consider Anderson a sexual predator, Judge Wiley still sentenced him to three months in Berrien County jail, 25 years on Michigans sex offender registry, and five years of probation.
Since Andersons brother is a 15-year-old, he can no longer live with his parents. He is also forbidden from using computers or smartphones for the rest of his life. Anderson and his family are fighting to get Judge Wiley to agree to re-sentencing him, but so far Wiley has deferred the case to consider other judicial precedent.
Records from court proceedings indicate that Judge Wiley had a grudge against hook-up culture, and it seems as though he wanted to take his frustration out on Anderson.
You went online, to use a fishermans expression, trolling for women to have sex with. That seems to be part of our culture now: meet, hook up, have sex, sayonara. Totally inappropriate behavior, Wiley said.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1363
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1363
I don't really get how this is his fault? And although it's classed as rape, how is it? If it was agreed to then i think the girl should be done for something.
His life is now ruined.
His life is now ruined.
- 8useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 20, 201014Year Member
Posts: 4,926
Reputation Power: 212
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 20, 201014Year Member
Posts: 4,926
Reputation Power: 212
If he was 19 and was going to have sex with a 17 year old he should have knew that it was illegal anyway so he's in the wrong.
I don't understand how it is rape when she agreed to it? Shouldn't it be classed as sex with a minor?
(I live in the UK and we may have different laws.)
But yeah his life is basically ruined now.. good luck explaining that to a potential employer.
I don't understand how it is rape when she agreed to it? Shouldn't it be classed as sex with a minor?
(I live in the UK and we may have different laws.)
But yeah his life is basically ruined now.. good luck explaining that to a potential employer.
- 4useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1363
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1363
Educate wrote If he was 19 and was going to have sex with a 17 year old he should have knew that it was illegal anyway so he's in the wrong.
I don't understand how it is rape when she agreed to it? Shouldn't it be classed as sex with a minor?
(I live in the UK and we may have different laws.)
But yeah his life is basically ruined now.. good luck explaining that to a potential employer.
In the UK you're allowed to have sex after 16. So surely he is not in the wrong?
- 3useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 19, 200914Year Member
Posts: 1,036
Reputation Power: 51
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 19, 200914Year Member
Posts: 1,036
Reputation Power: 51
I just don't see how this is his fault, if someone lies about there age what can you possibly do about, the judge is a bellend clearly.
- 6useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,116
Reputation Power: 136
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,116
Reputation Power: 136
Mickers wroteThat is exactly what I was thinking.. Hmm.Educate wrote If he was 19 and was going to have sex with a 17 year old he should have knew that it was illegal anyway so he's in the wrong.
I don't understand how it is rape when she agreed to it? Shouldn't it be classed as sex with a minor?
(I live in the UK and we may have different laws.)
But yeah his life is basically ruined now.. good luck explaining that to a potential employer.
In the UK you're allowed to have sex after 16. So surely he is not in the wrong?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Educate wrote If he was 19 and was going to have sex with a 17 year old he should have knew that it was illegal anyway so he's in the wrong.
I don't understand how it is rape when she agreed to it? Shouldn't it be classed as sex with a minor?
(I live in the UK and we may have different laws.)
But yeah his life is basically ruined now.. good luck explaining that to a potential employer.
Here in the U.S., the age of consent is 18 for the most part, with a few exceptions. Unfortunately for this gentlemen, Michigan's law is 18.
Edit: Michigan's is actually 16. Thanks for the info, ManWithNoName.
Last edited by Miss ; edited 1 time in total
- 3useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 02, 20159Year Member
Posts: 490
Reputation Power: 23
His life is now ruined, in the UK nothing would of been seen of that.
It is like when, Adam Johnson ( Footballer) got with a girl from a night club took her home and slept with her then found out she was 15. Who's fault is that, the nightclubs for allowing a minor in and Adam guessing she must be 18 because she is in 18+ bar.
It is like when, Adam Johnson ( Footballer) got with a girl from a night club took her home and slept with her then found out she was 15. Who's fault is that, the nightclubs for allowing a minor in and Adam guessing she must be 18 because she is in 18+ bar.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1363
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1363
Uninstall wrote His life is now ruined, in the UK nothing would of been seen of that.
It is like when, Adam Johnson ( Footballer) got with a girl from a night club took her home and slept with her then found out she was 15. Who's fault is that, the nightclubs for allowing a minor in and Adam guessing she must be 18 because she is in 18+ bar.
I agree that there is a serious loop hole.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 26, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,665
Reputation Power: 86
Miss wroteEducate wrote If he was 19 and was going to have sex with a 17 year old he should have knew that it was illegal anyway so he's in the wrong.
I don't understand how it is rape when she agreed to it? Shouldn't it be classed as sex with a minor?
(I live in the UK and we may have different laws.)
But yeah his life is basically ruined now.. good luck explaining that to a potential employer.
Here in the U.S., the age of consent is 18 for the most part, with a few exceptions. Unfortunately for this gentlemen, Michigan's law is 18.
Nah i dont think so, because i had a class last year, and a few state troopers came in to my school and talked to us about like the consenquenes of stuff like this. And he said you must be atleast 16 years old.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.