You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#61. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5,412
Reputation Power: 4408
Mine was an eclipse , 6 cyl. Still have it and love it
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#62. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,024
Reputation Power: 361
ive never had a car so i couldnt say
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#63. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,304
Reputation Power: 423
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,304
Reputation Power: 423
MagnaFlow wrotePdx wrote My first car was a 94 4Runner. That blew up not to long ago and my parents helped my out with getting a 2013 Lancer. Before Nagnaflow chimes in, yes it is a four cylinder. I average 27MPG and can go 0-60 in about 5 seconds, it has a LOT of power behind it. If you let a four cylinder breathe a little bit by adding wider exhaust pipes, adding a turbo, or even a hood with vents on it, they will perform at high standards.
Here is a picture I took today with my brother in-law.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
AGAIIINNNN needs a turbo for performance. Id like to see a video of your car doing 0-60 in 5. Just curious.. VERY curious. And love the new name tag you gave me. Thanks babe ;)
Supercharger > turbo
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#64. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,294
Reputation Power: 238
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,294
Reputation Power: 238
MagnaFlow wrotePdx wrote My first car was a 94 4Runner. That blew up not to long ago and my parents helped my out with getting a 2013 Lancer. Before Nagnaflow chimes in, yes it is a four cylinder. I average 27MPG and can go 0-60 in about 5 seconds, it has a LOT of power behind it. If you let a four cylinder breathe a little bit by adding wider exhaust pipes, adding a turbo, or even a hood with vents on it, they will perform at high standards.
Here is a picture I took today with my brother in-law.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
AGAIIINNNN needs a turbo for performance. Id like to see a video of your car doing 0-60 in 5. Just curious.. VERY curious. And love the new name tag you gave me. Thanks babe ;)
yea and your car just needs double the cylinders and triple the displacement.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#65. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 940
Reputation Power: 1317
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 940
Reputation Power: 1317
My first care was just a dinky ole '97 Camry, it got me from point A to point B though
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#66. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201410Year Member
Posts: 994
Reputation Power: 44
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201410Year Member
Posts: 994
Reputation Power: 44
fknvlink wroteMagnaFlow wrotePdx wrote My first car was a 94 4Runner. That blew up not to long ago and my parents helped my out with getting a 2013 Lancer. Before Nagnaflow chimes in, yes it is a four cylinder. I average 27MPG and can go 0-60 in about 5 seconds, it has a LOT of power behind it. If you let a four cylinder breathe a little bit by adding wider exhaust pipes, adding a turbo, or even a hood with vents on it, they will perform at high standards.
Here is a picture I took today with my brother in-law.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
AGAIIINNNN needs a turbo for performance. Id like to see a video of your car doing 0-60 in 5. Just curious.. VERY curious. And love the new name tag you gave me. Thanks babe ;)
yea and your car just needs double the cylinders and triple the displacement.
Well my cars a muscle car.. not a **** weed eater. Throw a turbo on my car and itll destroy. Look at the 03-04 cobras. 10+ years old and still kicking ass. By the way when you say "Your car needs 8 cylinders" its not a negative and it doesnt insult me lmao.. lots of cylinders is bad huh? So those v12 Ferrari's are slow because they need 12 cylinders huh? I sense a ricer..
- 0useful
- 3not useful
#67. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,629
Reputation Power: 90
MagnaFlow wroteYou need to stop insulting other people's choice of car, the performance of the car and also how it's been paid for. I have a 2002 VW Polo and it's only a 3 cylinder, because it's my first car and I don't need to be ragging it around.fknvlink wroteMagnaFlow wrotePdx wrote My first car was a 94 4Runner. That blew up not to long ago and my parents helped my out with getting a 2013 Lancer. Before Nagnaflow chimes in, yes it is a four cylinder. I average 27MPG and can go 0-60 in about 5 seconds, it has a LOT of power behind it. If you let a four cylinder breathe a little bit by adding wider exhaust pipes, adding a turbo, or even a hood with vents on it, they will perform at high standards.
Here is a picture I took today with my brother in-law.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
AGAIIINNNN needs a turbo for performance. Id like to see a video of your car doing 0-60 in 5. Just curious.. VERY curious. And love the new name tag you gave me. Thanks babe ;)
yea and your car just needs double the cylinders and triple the displacement.
Well my cars a muscle car.. not a **** weed eater. Throw a turbo on my car and itll destroy. Look at the 03-04 cobras. 10+ years old and still kicking ass. By the way when you say "Your car needs 8 cylinders" its not a negative and it doesnt insult me lmao.. lots of cylinders is bad huh? So those v12 Ferrari's are slow because they need 12 cylinders huh? I sense a ricer..
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#68. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,294
Reputation Power: 238
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,294
Reputation Power: 238
MagnaFlow wrotefknvlink wroteMagnaFlow wrotePdx wrote My first car was a 94 4Runner. That blew up not to long ago and my parents helped my out with getting a 2013 Lancer. Before Nagnaflow chimes in, yes it is a four cylinder. I average 27MPG and can go 0-60 in about 5 seconds, it has a LOT of power behind it. If you let a four cylinder breathe a little bit by adding wider exhaust pipes, adding a turbo, or even a hood with vents on it, they will perform at high standards.
Here is a picture I took today with my brother in-law.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
AGAIIINNNN needs a turbo for performance. Id like to see a video of your car doing 0-60 in 5. Just curious.. VERY curious. And love the new name tag you gave me. Thanks babe ;)
yea and your car just needs double the cylinders and triple the displacement.
Well my cars a muscle car.. not a **** weed eater. Throw a turbo on my car and itll destroy. Look at the 03-04 cobras. 10+ years old and still kicking ass. By the way when you say "Your car needs 8 cylinders" its not a negative and it doesnt insult me lmao.. lots of cylinders is bad huh? So those v12 Ferrari's are slow because they need 12 cylinders huh? I sense a ricer..
Every car is bad but yours? People have civics without boost that would be faster than your car. Every thing that has jap cars you call rice.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#69. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 20159Year Member
Posts: 107
Reputation Power: 5
#70. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,294
Reputation Power: 238
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,294
Reputation Power: 238
kwlbrdr wrote Pretty sure I have everyone beat. 1984 Plymouth Horizon, not the actual car, but it's exactly the same with color and everything.
I got this in 2001 so it was not new when I got it by all means.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Our first cars are same year models. Mine is a 1984 rx7 s3
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.