You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
So what are your initial thoughts on Infinite Warfare??
Posted:
So what are your initial thoughts on Infinite Warfare??Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201212Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 15
Dont just go with what everyone else is saying, there's no point in that. I want to hear your own opinion on what you think of it. I mean i know we have only seen a trailer but what do YOU think of it?
I dont really know what to think. When i watched the trailer tbh i didnt even really know wtf was going on. I don't think i will overly like it though because if im honest i just don't have fun playing bo3 because its so futuristic. And that's my own opinion btw. I still play bo3 when im bored because its something to do but i can only play at most 2 games before im bored of it then i go on mw2. If its more futuristic than bo3 then i just don't know -_-. I always buy the new cod's and even though Infinite Warfare got so much hate im still going to give it a chance because looking at a trailer doesn't show you what the games actually like.
I dont really know what to think. When i watched the trailer tbh i didnt even really know wtf was going on. I don't think i will overly like it though because if im honest i just don't have fun playing bo3 because its so futuristic. And that's my own opinion btw. I still play bo3 when im bored because its something to do but i can only play at most 2 games before im bored of it then i go on mw2. If its more futuristic than bo3 then i just don't know -_-. I always buy the new cod's and even though Infinite Warfare got so much hate im still going to give it a chance because looking at a trailer doesn't show you what the games actually like.
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,728
Reputation Power: 137
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,728
Reputation Power: 137
As long as it's not packed with supply drops and pay to win armour and weapons then I'll be fine with it. The problem has never been about the game being futuristic for anyone, it's about the pay to win and noob friendly approach the new CODS have.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 21
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 21
Motivational wrote As long as it's not packed with supply drops and pay to win armour and weapons then I'll be fine with it. The problem has never been about the game being futuristic for anyone, it's about the pay to win and noob friendly approach the new CODS have.
Please don't speak for everyone saying that the problem is not that its futuristic, I think that's the main problem with these new "CoDs"
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,709
Reputation Power: 377
- Space
- Thrusts
- NOT Boots on the ground
-Futuristic
-Futuristic
-Futuristic
-Futuristic
-Futuristic
No go for me, only thing I am interested is COD 4. BF1 is the game for me.
- Thrusts
- NOT Boots on the ground
-Futuristic
-Futuristic
-Futuristic
-Futuristic
-Futuristic
No go for me, only thing I am interested is COD 4. BF1 is the game for me.
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,728
Reputation Power: 137
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,728
Reputation Power: 137
-YoungSinatra wroteMotivational wrote As long as it's not packed with supply drops and pay to win armour and weapons then I'll be fine with it. The problem has never been about the game being futuristic for anyone, it's about the pay to win and noob friendly approach the new CODS have.
Please don't speak for everyone saying that the problem is not that its futuristic, I think that's the main problem with these new "CoDs"
According to the sales figures, far more people bought Call Of Duty: Ghosts than Modern Warfare Two. Infact, the same number of people bought Blackops Two as Modern Warfare and World at War put together, so I think I speak for the majority of COD players.
If they increased the size of the maps and decreased how overpowered some of the weapons were, it wouldn't be half as bad. We have exosuits today and although they're not as advanced as they are in Advanced Warfare, we'll probably be able to do that very soon.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201311Year Member
Posts: 4,444
Reputation Power: 176
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201311Year Member
Posts: 4,444
Reputation Power: 176
Motivational wrote As long as it's not packed with supply drops and pay to win armour and weapons then I'll be fine with it. The problem has never been about the game being futuristic for anyone, it's about the pay to win and noob friendly approach the new CODS have.game isnt free to play so theres no pay to win aspect in a pay to play game
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,728
Reputation Power: 137
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,728
Reputation Power: 137
Faux25 wroteMotivational wrote As long as it's not packed with supply drops and pay to win armour and weapons then I'll be fine with it. The problem has never been about the game being futuristic for anyone, it's about the pay to win and noob friendly approach the new CODS have.game isnt free to play so theres no pay to win aspect in a pay to play game
Of course there is.
You can purchase supply drops on Advanced Warfare and get an ASM1 Speakyeasy that would wouldn't be able to get otherwise. This weapon has an advantage over the normal ASM1, therefore you're going to win the gunfight with the better gun. You are literally paying to win the gunfight.
Pay-to-win
Games that let you buy better gear or allow you to make better items then everyone else at a faster rate and then makes the game largely unbalanced even for people who have skill in the game without paying.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 10,532
Reputation Power: 618
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 10,532
Reputation Power: 618
It almost looks similar to Black Ops 3. I really didn't see anything impressive in the trailer.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 11, 20168Year Member
Posts: 2
Reputation Power: 0
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201311Year Member
Posts: 4,444
Reputation Power: 176
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201311Year Member
Posts: 4,444
Reputation Power: 176
Motivational wrotepay is paying stuff that you cant get which sd you can get from playing so of course its not pay to winFaux25 wroteMotivational wrote As long as it's not packed with supply drops and pay to win armour and weapons then I'll be fine with it. The problem has never been about the game being futuristic for anyone, it's about the pay to win and noob friendly approach the new CODS have.game isnt free to play so theres no pay to win aspect in a pay to play game
Of course there is.
You can purchase supply drops on Advanced Warfare and get an ASM1 Speakyeasy that would wouldn't be able to get otherwise. This weapon has an advantage over the normal ASM1, therefore you're going to win the gunfight with the better gun. You are literally paying to win the gunfight.
Pay-to-win
Games that let you buy better gear or allow you to make better items then everyone else at a faster rate and then makes the game largely unbalanced even for people who have skill in the game without paying.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.