Tywin wrote

Glock- wrote Yes, i said that. That was in clear reference to the violent protestors that they can't not continue. Dude, come on. Do you know how to read? I mean jesus.

So crack down on the people who are trying to incite a riot. You don't generalize the thousands, tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of peaceful protestors as being the same as those few bad actors.

It's just a flat out lie to say that the 90% of protests in America are violent. It's a flat out lie to say that even 25% of the protests in America are violent.

Sure, i'll switch that on my topic but you need to learn how to read. Because literally this entire thing would have been avoided if you simply read my article and my responses.

This post is regarding the violent onces and it's stated multiple times in the topic itself. Also i referenced the good protestors but i feel like you totally avoided reading that.

Glock- wrote Sure, i'll switch that on my topic but you need to learn how to read. Because literally this entire thing would have been avoided if you simply read my article and my responses.

This post is regarding the violent onces and it's stated multiple times in the topic itself. Also i referenced the good protestors but i feel like you totally avoided reading that.

Or I can simply look at your post history and know what you're trying to get out. You take issue with dissent. It isn't much of a stretch to think that you're referencing the peaceful inaugural and women's march protests.

Tywin wrote

Glock- wrote Sure, i'll switch that on my topic but you need to learn how to read. Because literally this entire thing would have been avoided if you simply read my article and my responses.

This post is regarding the violent onces and it's stated multiple times in the topic itself. Also i referenced the good protestors but i feel like you totally avoided reading that.

Or I can simply look at your post history and know what you're trying to get out. You take issue with dissent. It isn't much of a stretch to think that you're referencing the peaceful inaugural and women's march protests.

Oh so you are a mind reader now, huh? That's impressive.

But i am referencing the violence that broke out in D.C. and the vandalism that occurred there.

Why would i have anything against women marching for their rights?

You might want to take up a career in reading minds, it's a big business apparently.

I really just want to address this part of the rant:

Protesters today whether it's when a police officer kills a suspect or someone is elected, are out of control.

I don't know if you are using time sensitive phrases like 'Today' and 'Now' in a way which means that in the past most protests have been a lot less violent than they are today, or if that is just an unintended consequence of using those phrases.

It's like the difference between saying, "Protests these days are crazy, they were much more peaceful way back when."
And, "That protest the other day was crazy."

If you mean the latter then discard everything I'm about to say, but if you mean the former then I think that's a bit dishonest.
Protests have always had violent counterparts. Some of the most violent and destructive protests in US history took place in the 1950's and 60's.
The Watts riot killed 34 people and caused $30 million in property damage.
The Detroit riot killed 43 people and over $40 million in property damage was caused.

People have always rioted like they do today. Yes, it's stupid, but it's not new unfortunately.

Cioran wrote I really just want to address this part of the rant:

Protesters today whether it's when a police officer kills a suspect or someone is elected, are out of control.

I don't know if you are using time sensitive phrases like 'Today' and 'Now' in a way which means that in the past most protests have been a lot less violent than they are today, or if that is just an unintended consequence of using those phrases.

It's like the difference between saying, "Protests these days are crazy, they were much more peaceful way back when."
And, "That protest the other day was crazy."

If you mean the latter then discard everything I'm about to say, but if you mean the former then I think that's a bit dishonest.
Protests have always had violent counterparts. Some of the most violent and destructive protests in US history took place in the 1950's and 60's.
The Watts riot killed 34 people and caused $30 million in property damage.
The Detroit riot killed 43 people and over $40 million in property damage was caused.

People have always rioted like they do today. Yes, it's stupid, but it's not new unfortunately.

That's what makes it such a shame, is the fact people have to make it violent. It benefits no one..

I completely agree with you. The protestors burning and destroying innocent people's property/belongings isn't going to help them in any way.

It's absolutely ridiculous, this is the weakest link in USA, the stupid people in their population.

ZTG wrote this is the weakest link in USA, the stupid people in their population.

46% of Trump voters think Hillary Clinton is running a child sex ring out of a pizza shop in our nation's capital and 41% want to bomb a fictional country from Aladdin.

Tywin wrote

ZTG wrote this is the weakest link in USA, the stupid people in their population.

46% of Trump voters think Hillary Clinton is running a child sex ring out of a pizza shop in our nation's capital and 41% want to bomb a fictional country from Aladdin.

Glock- wrote

Tywin wrote

ZTG wrote this is the weakest link in USA, the stupid people in their population.

46% of Trump voters think Hillary Clinton is running a child sex ring out of a pizza shop in our nation's capital and 41% want to bomb a fictional country from Aladdin.

And only one of our candidates in history was solely responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans. Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, Christoper Stevens.

Also the first candidate to ever send over 5,000 classified emails over an insecure network which is legally a crime.

Also the first candidate to have a husband that was impeached and had an affair in the Oval Office.


Also the first candidate to be in a position of power for 30 years and achomplish zero things because supporting them.


Also the first candidate to be under federal investigation into their charity organization for fraud and imbezzlement.



I can go all day with you. Trump isn't perfect ether but at least he's a legitimate businessman and has this countries best interest at heart.



You can sit here all you want and make it seem like you are so educated by easily going on google.

He wasn't attacking Trump, he was attacking Trump voters.
ZTG said that these are the stupidest people in America because of how they are protesting while Trump voters believe patently false things about Hillary Clinton.

He's just saying that there is stupidity on both sides of this.