You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
RG3 or Osweiler?
Posted:

RG3 or Osweiler?Posted:

Bobbyt15
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 08, 20177Year Member
Posts: 6
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 08, 20177Year Member
Posts: 6
Reputation Power: 0
if you follow football like i do, you know that Cleveland traded for Brock from Houston. Although there are rumors that Brock will be flopped for more draft picks, lets say he stays, who do you start? Robert Griffin or Brock Osweiler?
#2. Posted:
murrrkzz
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: May 08, 20168Year Member
Posts: 319
Reputation Power: 46
Status: Offline
Joined: May 08, 20168Year Member
Posts: 319
Reputation Power: 46
RG3 Brock sucks he isn't even worth if back up bench is ass or trade him for a better draft pick lol. That's just my opinion tho.
#3. Posted:
codfps
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 20177Year Member
Posts: 9
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 20177Year Member
Posts: 9
Reputation Power: 0
I would say Osweiller. I like RG3 and really wanted to see him do well in the league, but there's just something missing. I have seen Osweiller play well - on a team that would eventually win the Super Bowl.
#4. Posted:
coolbunny1234
  • Discord Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 200915Year Member
Posts: 6,493
Reputation Power: 8063
Motto: The Original Bunny
Motto: The Original Bunny
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 200915Year Member
Posts: 6,493
Reputation Power: 8063
Motto: The Original Bunny
rg3 is going to get released by the end of the day according to schefter, and if either were to stay, which isn't going to happen, I'd start rg3 in a heartbeat over brock. Plus arm strength, irratic accuracy, only difference is rg3 has the hypothetical athletic upside.
#5. Posted:
Leerbs
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: May 23, 20168Year Member
Posts: 15
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: May 23, 20168Year Member
Posts: 15
Reputation Power: 0
Neither, they both suck ass.
#6. Posted:
-urge-
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 23
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 23
Reputation Power: 2
Both bad picks, but I would go with RG3
#7. Posted:
JohnCalipari
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 20177Year Member
Posts: 71
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 20177Year Member
Posts: 71
Reputation Power: 2
AJ Mccaron or Jimmy Garoppolo are 2 back ups that would be better starters for them
#8. Posted:
Taylor
  • E3 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5,950
Reputation Power: 15113
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5,950
Reputation Power: 15113
You don't start RG3.
#9. Posted:
Savitar
  • Winter 2016
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 04, 20159Year Member
Posts: 4,200
Reputation Power: 72
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 04, 20159Year Member
Posts: 4,200
Reputation Power: 72
RG3 by a mile. Brock is just flat out terrible. He couldn't even throw an accurate pass to one of the best receivers in the league and so instead, he just targeted his TE all season. Terrible player. RG3 was a spectacular player in college and he still has the potential to be a starter if he didn't get injured so many times.

By the way, the Browns would never get anything for Osweiler. MAYBE a 7th round pick, but that's if you're lucky. He was only traded to the Browns for a salary dump and they still got a 2nd out of it and only gave up a 4th and a conditional 6th. No other team will trade for him because he's not starter material and not many teams in the league have the cap space to take on his contract nor would there even be a point for them to do it. I don't doubt the Browns will give him an opportunity to start, because you don't get anything for cutting him without seeing what he can do in Hue Jackson's system.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.