You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Discussion of the obvious false-flag attack on Las Vegas.
Posted:
Discussion of the obvious false-flag attack on Las Vegas.Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
I want to take some time to have a serious and intelligent discussion on the possibility of the recent Las Vegas shooting being a poorly planned false-flag attack.
I'll start with the conflicting stories.
Obviously there is going to be false information that is spread as the events occur. But at this point, the truth should have been fleshed out by now.
The media is sticking with the story of a single shooter, while multiple witnesses say there was definitely more than one shooter.
Echo and ricochet were taken into account, and does not appear to be the cause of the other set of gunfire which could be heard in some videos.
Take a look at this in depth analysis of the audio...
The Guard
Another point, is that initially it was reported that the Mandalay Bay Security Guard, Jesus Campos, was the first on scene at Steven Paddock's room.
It was said that he found the room based on the fire alarms going off from all of the gunfire. When Campos approached the door, Paddock saw him through a camera he had in the hallway and fired over 200 rounds through the door, hitting Campos once.
Now, the story has changed.
It's now being reported that Campos was shot before Paddock started firing on the crowd.
So, 200 rounds were fired through the door at Campos, minutes before Paddock started firing into the crowd.
Hundreds of rounds, and no one noticed? No calls or alarms?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] reports that Jesus Campos is now missing.
"David Hickey, a spokesman for the Security, Police, and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA), Campos' union, said he got a text that Campos had been taken to an urgent care facility, UMC Quick Care. But UMC Quick Care says none of their clinics filled out an intake request for a patient by that name, and Campos has been silent since the text vanishing, basically, into thin air."
The Motive
I could also go into the fact that Paddock had no motive. He was rich, retired, and did not care about politics or religion... as stated by his brother. So how does a single man plan a massacre in advance... haul 40+ weapons and thousands of rounds into his hotel room... and fire upon thousands of people... for no reason.
Not to mention, how did he get all of the equipment to his room anyway? He would have had to carry hundreds and hundreds of pounds of equipment to his room over multiple trips, without raising any suspicion? I work security in a casino, and the surveillance team at my location would have noticed a man repeatedly going to his room with a large amount of big luggage.
The Media
So now, only 2 weeks after the largest mass shooting in recent history, the media has changed it's headlines. All of a sudden, sexual harassment in Hollywood (is this even a surprise?) is more important than figuring out this attack. So the media is doing it's part to cover it up, and distract the people from the obvious flaws.
Those are only some of the points I could think of off the top of my head.
I'm sure there is a lot more out there, and a lot more proof.
But I want to move on to the point now.
If this did not happen as reported, what actually happened?
(Warning, potentially offensive opinion)
I'll start with the conflicting stories.
Obviously there is going to be false information that is spread as the events occur. But at this point, the truth should have been fleshed out by now.
The media is sticking with the story of a single shooter, while multiple witnesses say there was definitely more than one shooter.
Echo and ricochet were taken into account, and does not appear to be the cause of the other set of gunfire which could be heard in some videos.
Take a look at this in depth analysis of the audio...
The Guard
Another point, is that initially it was reported that the Mandalay Bay Security Guard, Jesus Campos, was the first on scene at Steven Paddock's room.
It was said that he found the room based on the fire alarms going off from all of the gunfire. When Campos approached the door, Paddock saw him through a camera he had in the hallway and fired over 200 rounds through the door, hitting Campos once.
Now, the story has changed.
It's now being reported that Campos was shot before Paddock started firing on the crowd.
So, 200 rounds were fired through the door at Campos, minutes before Paddock started firing into the crowd.
Hundreds of rounds, and no one noticed? No calls or alarms?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] reports that Jesus Campos is now missing.
"David Hickey, a spokesman for the Security, Police, and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA), Campos' union, said he got a text that Campos had been taken to an urgent care facility, UMC Quick Care. But UMC Quick Care says none of their clinics filled out an intake request for a patient by that name, and Campos has been silent since the text vanishing, basically, into thin air."
The Motive
I could also go into the fact that Paddock had no motive. He was rich, retired, and did not care about politics or religion... as stated by his brother. So how does a single man plan a massacre in advance... haul 40+ weapons and thousands of rounds into his hotel room... and fire upon thousands of people... for no reason.
Not to mention, how did he get all of the equipment to his room anyway? He would have had to carry hundreds and hundreds of pounds of equipment to his room over multiple trips, without raising any suspicion? I work security in a casino, and the surveillance team at my location would have noticed a man repeatedly going to his room with a large amount of big luggage.
The Media
So now, only 2 weeks after the largest mass shooting in recent history, the media has changed it's headlines. All of a sudden, sexual harassment in Hollywood (is this even a surprise?) is more important than figuring out this attack. So the media is doing it's part to cover it up, and distract the people from the obvious flaws.
Those are only some of the points I could think of off the top of my head.
I'm sure there is a lot more out there, and a lot more proof.
But I want to move on to the point now.
If this did not happen as reported, what actually happened?
(Warning, potentially offensive opinion)
In my opinion, it was a false-flag attack.
False flag is defined as covert operations that are designed to deceive in such a way that activities appear as though
they are being carried out by individual entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.
Who coordinated this attack? I don't know.
Why was this attack planned? I don't know.
However, I will share my personal opinion.
I think that the Clinton's could have been behind it.
It's already commonly known that they have no problem killing people.
And if you have no idea what I mean by that, look into the Clinton Body Count List.
But why? To push gun control.
The Hearing Protection Act was set to go be passed only a few weeks after this event occurred. The HPA retains all of the Gun Control Acts provisions on suppressors. In other words, purchasing a suppressor would continue to be subject to all the rules that apply to purchasing or possessing an ordinary firearm. The HPA removes suppressors from the National Firearms Act, which means buyers would not have to pay a $200 tax and would not have to go through a months-long federal registration process. The HPA does not preempt the laws in the states that prohibit suppressor possession. It does say that in states where suppressors are lawful, states may not impose additional registration requirements or special taxes.
Immediately after the shooting Hillary Clinton posted this on Twitter.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
And now, the act is not likely to go through. Is her saying that really a coincidence?
But it wasn't planned just for silencers.
It was just another part in their war on the second amendment.
The left wants to disarm the American people, slowly but surely.
And they don't care how they do it. If you think they care about killing people, look at 9/11.
But reason is just my opinion. The facts above remain the same, regardless of what you believe.
False flag is defined as covert operations that are designed to deceive in such a way that activities appear as though
they are being carried out by individual entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.
Who coordinated this attack? I don't know.
Why was this attack planned? I don't know.
However, I will share my personal opinion.
I think that the Clinton's could have been behind it.
It's already commonly known that they have no problem killing people.
And if you have no idea what I mean by that, look into the Clinton Body Count List.
But why? To push gun control.
The Hearing Protection Act was set to go be passed only a few weeks after this event occurred. The HPA retains all of the Gun Control Acts provisions on suppressors. In other words, purchasing a suppressor would continue to be subject to all the rules that apply to purchasing or possessing an ordinary firearm. The HPA removes suppressors from the National Firearms Act, which means buyers would not have to pay a $200 tax and would not have to go through a months-long federal registration process. The HPA does not preempt the laws in the states that prohibit suppressor possession. It does say that in states where suppressors are lawful, states may not impose additional registration requirements or special taxes.
Immediately after the shooting Hillary Clinton posted this on Twitter.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
And now, the act is not likely to go through. Is her saying that really a coincidence?
But it wasn't planned just for silencers.
It was just another part in their war on the second amendment.
The left wants to disarm the American people, slowly but surely.
And they don't care how they do it. If you think they care about killing people, look at 9/11.
But reason is just my opinion. The facts above remain the same, regardless of what you believe.
The following 5 users thanked Illustrated for this useful post:
Allergies (10-19-2017), TheFakeMrSneaky (10-18-2017), Brigand (10-18-2017), Skates (10-18-2017), BJP (10-18-2017)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Nice opinion. I like it.
But there is one problem, you have to remember who is above the Clintons - Mossad.
But there is one problem, you have to remember who is above the Clintons - Mossad.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Miss wrote Nice opinion. I like it.Actually if you could enlighten me on this, it would be appreciated. I honestly don't know what you mean by that.
But there is one problem, you have to remember who is above the Clintons - Mossad.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.