MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

Btw, Its not real life, its a game.
What kind of Black Ops soldier wants Orange Tiger?

I liked a lot of the MW2 maps better than i like black ops maps.. I hate the Black Ops no quickscoping thing as well.

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was not a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

Edit: I know BO isn't realistic. It is an ARCADE shooter. It may as well be halo in terms of realism. I am just saying that they are trying to branch away from the mold that MW2 left them. How is there going to be improvement if you are buying the same rehashed game every year?

i agree that blackops is worse than MW2 but not for any of the reasons you put.. lol

first of all the emblems on blackops is waybetter you can be creative and make your own
and second every gun in blackops is underpowered.

its never 1 burst kill with the m16 anymore its always like 2-4 burst its ridiculous.
blackops sucks because:

1. GFX sucks azz
2. Guns are underpowered
3. the spawns are f ing random and stupidly placed.
4. every body camps a whole lot more then MW2
5. those damn RCXD cars are around you every 30 seconds
and the list goes on and on

Rep if u agree

nuke town is better than rust on black osp <3 u nuke town

Wtf?BS!!@!@@!Mw2 sucked @$$ BO is a beast...

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

On the subject of Camos.
'What kind of soldier wants Red tiger'
What kind of soldier wants Orange Tiger?
Most of the camos on that game are just repeats just arranged differently.

On the subject of sniping
Alls I can say is mute the annoying kids and move on.

just made a rant about this also, the only fun thing on black ops is zombies

the only thing i agree on is the quickscoping

i mostly disagree, you said you like tittles/emblems better on mw2? Black Ops you can make your on emblem, and have a title match it,

not a bad post tho, all yur opinions

Its your opinion. Truth is, both games have their flaws. There can be countless of arguments to make of which game is better. But honestly, I think they're both good. It's just different since MW2 is supposed to be "modern". Neither of them are realistic, thats why they're games. Treyarch and Infinity Ward are both good at what they do. But anyways, its cool that you think mw2 is better, but theres a lot of people that think otherwise.