These are all wrong. Are you just mad about emblems because you can't be creative and create one?

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

On the subject of Camos.
'What kind of soldier wants Red tiger'
What kind of soldier wants Orange Tiger?
Most of the camos on that game are just repeats just arranged differently.

On the subject of sniping
Alls I can say is mute the annoying kids and move on.

What about all the other points?
Are you shut down?

Oh and the point was that you could truly no longer snipe because everybody assumed you were quick scoping. In black ops it actually takes patience and strategy to snipe.

Am I shut down?
Erm no..

How can I argue with 1 point, when the subject is changed every 10 seconds?

The subject has not changed once. You gave 5 opinions and one thesis. It has in no way branched off from there...

You argue on the problems with camos, then sniping, then recoil.
Lets just stick with 1 reason at a time okay?

Exactly, 3 of the original 5: (camos/weapons/quick scoping). I can take it slower if you need me to.

I don't need you to take it slower.
We already covered Camos and Recoil.
Stop trying to make a valid argument on something that isn't all that important.
Why do you think I choose not to say much about it?

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

And i agree with this post 100%.

But MW2 does have its bad points.

Earth wrote These are all wrong. Are you just mad about emblems because you can't be creative and create one?

I'm sorry I can't create a picture of a duck getting raped by a pig who is getting raped by a soldier?

are you kidding me

the only people that complain about black ops are not real gamers, little kids and if you suck at it you will complain



so go back to mw2

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was not a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

Edit: I know BO isn't realistic. It is an ARCADE shooter. It may as well be halo in terms of realism. I am just saying that they are trying to branch away from the mold that MW2 left them. How is there going to be improvement if you are buying the same rehashed game every year?

Modern Warfare 2 was very successful, Why would they completely change the game?
What Treyarch did with the sniping in Black Ops is just horrific.
Why change something that didn't need to be changed?

MW2 was successful..... for infinity ward.....

The game was completely hacked and the core purpose of ranking up, titles, and etc was completely ruined. The game had little competitive replay battle and most of the hardcore fans were disappointed. Sniping is different because it is Treyarch's game. Its a sniper, use it like one.

I will agree with you that hacking ruined the purpose of the game.
Can you not say that in time, Black Ops will become just like it?
Its a game, your supposed to be spontaneous with a sniper rifle.
Treyarch didn't have to complete remove Quick Scoping and affect Hard scoping in the process.
When you zoom in on Black Ops, The scope is off track from the original crosshair.
So while your trying to re aim while scoping in, Your sure to have been found by then.

I never said I don't think hacking might ruin BO, but it has not yet. Treyarch is putting care and is actually resetting people that have peculiar rank/money gain. Quick scoping is directly related to normal sniping: the more quick scoping the less actual sniping.

People should have the right to choose what style of sniper they want to be.
Treyarch shouldn't dictate how people should use a sniper.
If people have such a big problem with Quick scoping, maybe they should learn how to?
It would solve a lot of problems.

Yes but quick scoping was not even popular until MW2. Obviously Treyarch did not like what infinity ward created, so they decided to not change sniping from W@W. Quick soping is not sniping, it would be Quick sniping then...

TTG_LowieUK wrote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

And i agree with this post 100%.

But MW2 does have its bad points.

I agree, Mw2 isn't the Jesus Christ of games.

And Gamer, I plan on it

iSerene wrote Alls I've heard kids do today is talk trash about MW2, when MW2 is better than Black Ops.
5 Reasons Why MW2 is better:

1. Quick Scoping: I don't want any of the 'wanna be' Black Ops quick scopers to say its easy to quick scope in Black Ops.

2. Maps: The maps in Black Ops are just horrific. No time was put into them.

3. Weapons: The weapons in Mw2 are better, Most of Black Ops new weapons are overpowered.

4. Titles/Emblems: The title/emblem in Modern Warfare 2 is just so much better than Black Ops' At least MW2 has some clever sayings that relate to the game.

5. Camos: I know that Black Ops has like 25 camos, but about 15 of them look completely similar and they're sketchy as hell. Red Tiger on MW2 has always been and will always be the most used Camo on COD games.

Anyone agree/disagree?
Let the trolling begin.

1 quick scooping is stupid
2 maps id say black ops is better
3 there are 10 times the weapons in BO and they are balanced
4 mw2 titles were probably better (NOT EMBLEM)
5 camos are really the same not that big of a deal but black ops has chrome and gold



so the only thing better were the titles... in my opinion
perks were way over powered and evreyone was a tool

U high dude??????????????

iSerene wrote Alls I've heard kids do today is talk trash about MW2, when MW2 is better than Black Ops.
5 Reasons Why MW2 is better:

1. Quick Scoping: I don't want any of the 'wanna be' Black Ops quick scopers to say its easy to quick scope in Black Ops.

2. Maps: The maps in Black Ops are just horrific. No time was put into them.

3. Weapons: The weapons in Mw2 are better, Most of Black Ops new weapons are overpowered.

4. Titles/Emblems: The title/emblem in Modern Warfare 2 is just so much better than Black Ops' At least MW2 has some clever sayings that relate to the game.

5. Camos: I know that Black Ops has like 25 camos, but about 15 of them look completely similar and they're sketchy as hell. Red Tiger on MW2 has always been and will always be the most used Camo on COD games.

Anyone agree/disagree?
Let the trolling begin.

i agree that quickscoping is better in MW2 but noscoping is better in BO

i like the camos in BO but mw2 camos are higher quality.

the title and emblem set is better in black ops i think

maps are decent

all guns are stronger because its more realistic