MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was not a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

Edit: I know BO isn't realistic. It is an ARCADE shooter. It may as well be halo in terms of realism. I am just saying that they are trying to branch away from the mold that MW2 left them. How is there going to be improvement if you are buying the same rehashed game every year?

Modern Warfare 2 was very successful, Why would they completely change the game?
What Treyarch did with the sniping in Black Ops is just horrific.
Why change something that didn't need to be changed?

MW2 was successful..... for infinity ward.....

The game was completely hacked and the core purpose of ranking up, titles, and etc was completely ruined. The game had little competitive replay battle and most of the hardcore fans were disappointed. Sniping is different because it is Treyarch's game. Its a sniper, use it like one.

I will agree with you that hacking ruined the purpose of the game.
Can you not say that in time, Black Ops will become just like it?
Its a game, your supposed to be spontaneous with a sniper rifle.
Treyarch didn't have to complete remove Quick Scoping and affect Hard scoping in the process.
When you zoom in on Black Ops, The scope is off track from the original crosshair.
So while your trying to re aim while scoping in, Your sure to have been found by then.

I never said I don't think hacking might ruin BO, but it has not yet. Treyarch is putting care and is actually resetting people that have peculiar rank/money gain. Quick scoping is directly related to normal sniping: the more quick scoping the less actual sniping.

People should have the right to choose what style of sniper they want to be.
Treyarch shouldn't dictate how people should use a sniper.
If people have such a big problem with Quick scoping, maybe they should learn how to?
It would solve a lot of problems.

Yes but quick scoping was not even popular until MW2. Obviously Treyarch did not like what infinity ward created, so they decided to not change sniping from W@W. Quick soping is not sniping, it would be Quick sniping then...

Quick Scoping is the only reason that people even choose to use snipers.
People around the COD4 and COD5 periods of time hard scoped.
MW2 came out, and people wanted to quick scope.
It was fun.
People became good at it.
They loved it
Black Ops came out and completely ruined it.
You have to look at it from a Quick Scoper's eyes.

iSerene wrote

Earth wrote These are all wrong. Are you just mad about emblems because you can't be creative and create one?

I'm sorry I can't create a picture of a duck getting raped by a pig who is getting raped by a soldier?

They choose to be ****. This thread is full of retards. Black Ops is 10x the game MW2 was. MW2 was the biggest piece of shit ever created. Wasn't even skilful to "Quickscope". Snipers in Black Ops are awesome and I back their decision 100%. Black Ops is actually competitive again, just like cod4. MW2 was a pile of wank made for shitty 12 year olds who think they are the shizz.

Notfub wrote

iSerene wrote

Earth wrote These are all wrong. Are you just mad about emblems because you can't be creative and create one?

I'm sorry I can't create a picture of a duck getting raped by a pig who is getting raped by a soldier?

They choose to be **** This thread is full of retards. Black Ops is 10x the game MW2 was. MW2 was the biggest piece of **** ever created. Wasn't even skilful to "Quickscope". Snipers in Black Ops are awesome and I back their decision 100%. Black Ops is actually competitive again, just like cod4. MW2 was a pile of **** made for **** 12 year olds who think they are the shizz.

So your saying that you could play someone like Predator or Grizz and beat them because it takes 'No Skill'?

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was not a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

Edit: I know BO isn't realistic. It is an ARCADE shooter. It may as well be halo in terms of realism. I am just saying that they are trying to branch away from the mold that MW2 left them. How is there going to be improvement if you are buying the same rehashed game every year?

Modern Warfare 2 was very successful, Why would they completely change the game?
What Treyarch did with the sniping in Black Ops is just horrific.
Why change something that didn't need to be changed?

MW2 was successful..... for infinity ward.....

The game was completely hacked and the core purpose of ranking up, titles, and etc was completely ruined. The game had little competitive replay battle and most of the hardcore fans were disappointed. Sniping is different because it is Treyarch's game. Its a sniper, use it like one.

I will agree with you that hacking ruined the purpose of the game.
Can you not say that in time, Black Ops will become just like it?
Its a game, your supposed to be spontaneous with a sniper rifle.
Treyarch didn't have to complete remove Quick Scoping and affect Hard scoping in the process.
When you zoom in on Black Ops, The scope is off track from the original crosshair.
So while your trying to re aim while scoping in, Your sure to have been found by then.

I never said I don't think hacking might ruin BO, but it has not yet. Treyarch is putting care and is actually resetting people that have peculiar rank/money gain. Quick scoping is directly related to normal sniping: the more quick scoping the less actual sniping.

People should have the right to choose what style of sniper they want to be.
Treyarch shouldn't dictate how people should use a sniper.
If people have such a big problem with Quick scoping, maybe they should learn how to?
It would solve a lot of problems.

Yes but quick scoping was not even popular until MW2. Obviously Treyarch did not like what infinity ward created, so they decided to not change sniping from W@W. Quick soping is not sniping, it would be Quick sniping then...

Quick Scoping is the only reason that people even choose to use snipers.
People around the COD4 and COD5 periods of time hard scoped.
MW2 came out, and people wanted to quick scope.
It was fun.
People became good at it.
They loved it
Black Ops came out and completely ruined it.
You have to look at it from a Quick Scoper's eyes.

Exactly my point. You have to look at it from a non-quick scoper's eyes. I guarantee if you quick scoped you got PISSED off most of them time when you did it in Pubs.

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was not a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

Edit: I know BO isn't realistic. It is an ARCADE shooter. It may as well be halo in terms of realism. I am just saying that they are trying to branch away from the mold that MW2 left them. How is there going to be improvement if you are buying the same rehashed game every year?

Modern Warfare 2 was very successful, Why would they completely change the game?
What Treyarch did with the sniping in Black Ops is just horrific.
Why change something that didn't need to be changed?

MW2 was successful..... for infinity ward.....

The game was completely hacked and the core purpose of ranking up, titles, and etc was completely ruined. The game had little competitive replay battle and most of the hardcore fans were disappointed. Sniping is different because it is Treyarch's game. Its a sniper, use it like one.

I will agree with you that hacking ruined the purpose of the game.
Can you not say that in time, Black Ops will become just like it?
Its a game, your supposed to be spontaneous with a sniper rifle.
Treyarch didn't have to complete remove Quick Scoping and affect Hard scoping in the process.
When you zoom in on Black Ops, The scope is off track from the original crosshair.
So while your trying to re aim while scoping in, Your sure to have been found by then.

I never said I don't think hacking might ruin BO, but it has not yet. Treyarch is putting care and is actually resetting people that have peculiar rank/money gain. Quick scoping is directly related to normal sniping: the more quick scoping the less actual sniping.

People should have the right to choose what style of sniper they want to be.
Treyarch shouldn't dictate how people should use a sniper.
If people have such a big problem with Quick scoping, maybe they should learn how to?
It would solve a lot of problems.

Yes but quick scoping was not even popular until MW2. Obviously Treyarch did not like what infinity ward created, so they decided to not change sniping from W@W. Quick soping is not sniping, it would be Quick sniping then...

Quick Scoping is the only reason that people even choose to use snipers.
People around the COD4 and COD5 periods of time hard scoped.
MW2 came out, and people wanted to quick scope.
It was fun.
People became good at it.
They loved it
Black Ops came out and completely ruined it.
You have to look at it from a Quick Scoper's eyes.

Exactly my point. You have to look at it from a non-quick scoper's eyes. I guarantee if you quick scoped you got PISSED off most of them time when you did it in Pubs.

If hate getting sniped period
This entire argument is just pretty pointless, because it doesn't change anything.
Main reason why Quick Scopers dislike MW2 and Non quick scopers like it.

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was not a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

Edit: I know BO isn't realistic. It is an ARCADE shooter. It may as well be halo in terms of realism. I am just saying that they are trying to branch away from the mold that MW2 left them. How is there going to be improvement if you are buying the same rehashed game every year?

Modern Warfare 2 was very successful, Why would they completely change the game?
What Treyarch did with the sniping in Black Ops is just horrific.
Why change something that didn't need to be changed?

MW2 was successful..... for infinity ward.....

The game was completely hacked and the core purpose of ranking up, titles, and etc was completely ruined. The game had little competitive replay battle and most of the hardcore fans were disappointed. Sniping is different because it is Treyarch's game. Its a sniper, use it like one.

I will agree with you that hacking ruined the purpose of the game.
Can you not say that in time, Black Ops will become just like it?
Its a game, your supposed to be spontaneous with a sniper rifle.
Treyarch didn't have to complete remove Quick Scoping and affect Hard scoping in the process.
When you zoom in on Black Ops, The scope is off track from the original crosshair.
So while your trying to re aim while scoping in, Your sure to have been found by then.

I never said I don't think hacking might ruin BO, but it has not yet. Treyarch is putting care and is actually resetting people that have peculiar rank/money gain. Quick scoping is directly related to normal sniping: the more quick scoping the less actual sniping.

People should have the right to choose what style of sniper they want to be.
Treyarch shouldn't dictate how people should use a sniper.
If people have such a big problem with Quick scoping, maybe they should learn how to?
It would solve a lot of problems.

Yes but quick scoping was not even popular until MW2. Obviously Treyarch did not like what infinity ward created, so they decided to not change sniping from W@W. Quick soping is not sniping, it would be Quick sniping then...

Quick Scoping is the only reason that people even choose to use snipers.
People around the COD4 and COD5 periods of time hard scoped.
MW2 came out, and people wanted to quick scope.
It was fun.
People became good at it.
They loved it
Black Ops came out and completely ruined it.
You have to look at it from a Quick Scoper's eyes.

Exactly my point. You have to look at it from a non-quick scoper's eyes. I guarantee if you quick scoped you got PISSED off most of them time when you did it in Pubs.

If hate getting sniped period
This entire argument is just pretty pointless, because it doesn't change anything.
Quick Scoper vs. Non quick scoper

I am glad you realized it. Now it was a pleasure talking to ya. 8)

I agree with the map because the maps suck in this game

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote

iSerene wrote

MaV3Rik wrote IMO the maps are far better. They seem to have put some thought on routes/spots/counter spots. On the subject of weapons, guns actually have recoil now. I am sorry that it is back to the old days of COD4 and Pre-COD4. On the subject of quick scoping, it is a different game. Thank God we don't have a bunch of little kids screaming "OOOOOOOOOOOOOO 360 QuIcKzSc0P3S!!!1". Quick scoping had no purpose as a game style, it was just a strategy used to possibly save your life in close range encounters.

Finally on the subject of camos, Black ops is by no means a realistic game, but at least they gave us some realistic camos. What kind of Black Ops soldier wants a "Red Tiger" gun?

In a nutshell, you can state your opinion, but don't tell us which one us better with absolutely no argument.

My argument is summed up.
I didn't want to sit here and type out 1000 reasons why MW2 is better.
On your defense of Quick Scoping.
Quick Scoping made COD games what they are.
If you don't like Quick Scoping because of some reason, thats okay.
But, I'd rather kill someone by Quickscoping them or sniping them in general rather than spraying with a Galil or AUG.
Nuff Nuff.

I am happy you decided to only address one point, but that made absolutely no sense. COD made its name with customization, graphics, and revolutionary game play (Specifically COD4). I remember staying up every night during one summer playing COD4 Till three in the morning. MW2 didn't have that feeling because of little kids arguing about who could quick scope and who couldn't. Quick scoping completely ruined regular sniping as well, because kids decided if it was not a quick scope that you were a horrible Hard scoping ******.

Edit: I know BO isn't realistic. It is an ARCADE shooter. It may as well be halo in terms of realism. I am just saying that they are trying to branch away from the mold that MW2 left them. How is there going to be improvement if you are buying the same rehashed game every year?

Modern Warfare 2 was very successful, Why would they completely change the game?
What Treyarch did with the sniping in Black Ops is just horrific.
Why change something that didn't need to be changed?

MW2 was successful..... for infinity ward.....

The game was completely hacked and the core purpose of ranking up, titles, and etc was completely ruined. The game had little competitive replay battle and most of the hardcore fans were disappointed. Sniping is different because it is Treyarch's game. Its a sniper, use it like one.

I will agree with you that hacking ruined the purpose of the game.
Can you not say that in time, Black Ops will become just like it?
Its a game, your supposed to be spontaneous with a sniper rifle.
Treyarch didn't have to complete remove Quick Scoping and affect Hard scoping in the process.
When you zoom in on Black Ops, The scope is off track from the original crosshair.
So while your trying to re aim while scoping in, Your sure to have been found by then.

All your aruments make absolutly no sence. Sorry for jumping in i just couldnt listen to the terrible reasons that you have for MW2 being better than black ops. The devs for treyach listend to what the fans needed not what they want. They acually knew what to fix like quickscopeing, in reality you wouldnt want to quick scope someone would you? and im thinking that you a little 12 year old kid that went negative in a black ops trying to quick scope or somthing. and yes there is a way to quick scope ppl, but im not gonna tell you how. all you seem to be arguing about is quick scopeing.

ummm
Every perk doesnt have a commando lunge that pisses me off

other than that Black Ops is ok

Your typing makes no sense.
And just so you know, I didn't make any argument in the replies that you quoted me in.
Just thought I'd let you know.