Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, therefore I must respect your reasoning.

In my opinion, Black Ops is better in almost every single way.
The Maps in Black Ops are creative and fresh. They did indeed put a lot of time into them. In fact, that's where most of their time went. They even said they created the Maps before starting the Campaign, and they kinda worked with the multiplayer maps to create environments for the Campaign.
The weapons in Black Ops are balanced, and they actually have RECOIL. Something that was non-existent in MW2. Every gun class has it's purpose in Black Ops, unlike MW2. Finally, Black Ops takes Emblems to a whole new level with the ridiculous amount of customization; I love it.

Although, I have to agree with you on the Camos. Theres really only 2 nice ones in Black Ops. Whereas in MW2, almost all the camos looked nice.

I disagree w/ everything but maps and quickscoping.

Black Ops is way more put together than Mw2.

Competitively Black Ops is better. The whole LAN system is better. Will work way better with MLG.

Single player blows every other CoD game out of the water. No doubt.Dont even bother arguing with this. Its true, they're building up this campain to go with the next Treyarch Gamee.

I could keep going. Bottom Line - Way better than Mw2. Without a Doubt. Not my opinion, its a fact. 8)

your opinions are yours.

1. I like most of the Black Ops maps.
2. The guns are mostly fair too me. The only thing is mostly who ever gets first shot wins.
3. I hated how on MW2, everyone would go in a search game and fail at 9/10 quick scopes and thats all people did in mw2.
4. You better like Black Ops for its zombies.
5. mw2 was very succesful and so if black ops.
6. Emblems, yes i semi agree, except i do enjoy looking at random emblems.
7. Camos? If they had red tiger and blue tiger. They would be the best. And spongebob camo but ya know.

iSerene wrote

Notfub wrote

iSerene wrote

Earth wrote These are all wrong. Are you just mad about emblems because you can't be creative and create one?

I'm sorry I can't create a picture of a duck getting raped by a pig who is getting raped by a soldier?

They choose to be **** This thread is full of retards. Black Ops is 10x the game MW2 was. MW2 was the biggest piece of **** ever created. Wasn't even skilful to "Quickscope". Snipers in Black Ops are awesome and I back their decision 100%. Black Ops is actually competitive again, just like cod4. MW2 was a pile of **** made for **** 12 year olds who think they are the shizz.

So your saying that you could play someone like Predator or Grizz and beat them because it takes 'No Skill'?

Yes, I feel confident that I could easily take on grizz with a good SMG/AR. He plays days on end to get the kind of clips he gets. Ofcourse Grizz is good at what he does but if we talk in terms of actually good at the game and not just Snipng, hes shit. He would 100% agree that Snipers on MW2 were easy to use and that it's ore skilful to use a BLack Ops sniper/COD4 sniper/ Cod 2 sniper.

I have used black ops snipers alot, The scoped kills are easy. The blind firing is easy. Quickscoping IS hard to accomplish but why would treyarch want it? They are creating the game for balanced gameplay, not the most unbalanced game of all time (MW2)

Treyarch aren't looking to make a game for quickscopers mainly because 80% of people don't do it. They would rather follow a halo routine and get COD back into competitive gaming just like COD4.Thats where the $$$$ is. MW2 was THE most unbalanced game ever.

i new he would say quickscopes

Wel, they both have their ups and downs... But the black ops maps are shit

5 reasons why it doesnt matter
1.its a game
2.its a game
3.its a game
4.its a game
5.its a game
but opinions are opinions.

Oh, and don't even get me started on MW2 quickscoping. A 12 year old with several missing fingers can quickscope relatively well in MW2. It took absolutely no skill.

Weapons: The weapons in Mw2 are better, Most of Black Ops new weapons are overpowered.
This is a complete lie