Fasko wrote

-Runescape- wrote

Fasko wrote Soo..... MW3

lololol

MW3 will be different then the other CoD... It is an ENTIRELY new studio they are using to make the game...

That sucks. Who's making it?

Not the crappy IW, Sledgehammer is... Should be good!

The guns in black ops are not overpowered lol.

It takes a whole clip to kill 3 people in black ops.

You could easily kill 4+ with half a clip in MW2

sledgehammer is the worst. What games have they made that are so great? or even heard of?

zorrinth wrote sledgehammer is the worst. What games have they made that are so great? or even heard of?

Lol they are a brand new studio idiot... Some people from IW are in it...

Its not that its bettter, its just a different style.

Ok let me start...
1. Weapons are only developing in that time period. Learn History we have the past for a reason.
2. Quick scoping is cheap and is another form of knifing but with a bullet. You get scared so you aim but have no time so you fire. You also don't see someone in real life jumping off a clip 360'n then quick scoping someone? No you don't because they will die on landing and its impossible to quick scope in real life. The aim of sniping in COD was to be realistic and tactical but infinity ward threw that out the window for a pointless cheap trick. Treyarch however has stuck by their word to make it realistic and tactical.
3. The maps not time put into them? if there was no time put into them there would be a square box of grass with two spawns... They put more into the campaign than multi player because they had a better idea than MW2's campaign it flows by history not some random lie about America getting taken over then saved by 2-4 people.

Last of all if you complain this much go make a COD yourself? Oh wait you cannot because you aren't educated to make them...Leave it to the professionals to make the games and you to just play them ;)
Also if you hate it so much why buy it? you seem to know that it was going to be a terrible game.

WSFMigo wrote Ok let me start...
1. Weapons are only developing in that time period. Learn History we have the past for a reason.
2. Quick scoping is cheap and is another form of knifing but with a bullet. You get scared so you aim but have no time so you fire. You also don't see someone in real life jumping off a clip 360'n then quick scoping someone? No you don't because they will die on landing and its impossible to quick scope in real life. The aim of sniping in COD was to be realistic and tactical but infinity ward threw that out the window for a pointless cheap trick. Treyarch however has stuck by their word to make it realistic and tactical.
3. The maps not time put into them? if there was no time put into them there would be a square box of grass with two spawns... They put more into the campaign than multi player because they had a better idea than MW2's campaign it flows by history not some random lie about America getting taken over then saved by 2-4 people.

Last of all if you complain this much go make a COD yourself? Oh wait you cannot because you aren't educated to make them...Leave it to the professionals to make the games and you to just play them ;)
Also if you hate it so much why buy it? you seem to know that it was going to be a terrible game.

'Talking to the guy with a 4.2 G.P.A. in AP Classes.
Good one
Games were made to be criticized, get over yourself.

ok well the guns in black ops are not over powered!!!!!
that is the dumbest thing i have ever heard!!
it takes lots more shots wit the guns in black ops than mw2 guns like the ump45!!

should be in rant section

First mw2 is way better then black ops the graphics are better and overall online play is better idk bout you guys but i really miss quick scoping ya quick scoping on that game was more funnn. So yai <3 MW2

i agree with you on all 5 of them