Ix13thHomeyXi wrote I do here are my reasons

cod waw
1.mp40 is a noob weapon
2.Dogs are crap
3.all the tenth prestiges are back on it making it impossible to win.

Cod mw2
1.everyone camps
2.ump45 is the new mp40
3.most of the killstreakes i think suck
4.boosting
5.mods
6.glitches
7.models
8.heartbeat sensor
9.bling

I could go on forever
so i think waw is twice as good 30,000 still play it so most people prefer it.

My counter arguement

WaW:
1. Use it back
2. Knife/Kill them
3. You must be crap, 10th Means nothing, They could have 90 Days Playtime

MW2:
1.Camp back or Anti-Camp (Rush)
2. Use it back, Or most Assault rifle's will rape it
3. You are a retard, they aren't
4. How does this effect you (If it does do TheSandyRavage and rape the boosters)
5. How does this effect you (10th lobbies, others are patched)
6. All annoying ones get patched
7. Patched, they suck now
8. Use Ninja
9. WTF???

Ya Dick!

The first post guy has a point, MW2 is too noob friendly. World at War requires a bit more skill, sure there isn't as many killstreaks but MW2 has too many. IW didn't really think about the guns before they released the game e.g model 1887. If you join in a boosting game, leave it. Last note, second post guy. You can't critize someone over having a different view to yourself.

yea

well that would be why i am playing cod 4 right now

so i think waw is twice as good 30,000 still play it so most people prefer it.

Hmm.. 30,000 people arn't most.. compare that to MW2, and it gets blown away.