this topic was over a month old............

that would beh coowal

i would really like for them to do that

theartftw avoid posting on topics over 2 weeks old i told you before ...
and as for another W@W type game...im not into that i find modern warfare games way better









:!: Rep Kindly Appreciated :!:

i always thought that aswell that would be a good game if IW did it!

i like modern warfare better with the newer guns. i would rather have them make one with guns like mp5, ak-47, M40A3 Sniper and p90 instead of mp40 svt and arisaka. modern warfare is more intense, world at war was to much people sitting around camping or going in tanks

yeah i know what you mean about the tanks and camping.............but foe me WAW is all about the zombies now. i aint even played the maps from mp 3 and only twice from mp2.

U_BE_TRIFLEN69 wrote ya but i think the modern ones will be better

You can't really compare the Modern Call of Duty(s) to the Older ones. I mean, yes it's the same controls but it's comparing apples to bananas.

I mean, sure same concept. War, Fight and kill. But many games have this. I don't think it is fair to compare the two games based on their differences. I mean, you may rather fight with a M16 and modern weapons, but some rather play with Kar's and Stg's.

To be completely truthful, I sorta like Call of Duty 4, I don't like it's weapons, since all of them are faulty. Which comes with Modern guns, since Modern guns have longer ranges and that would be "boring" so they made it have horrible range.

And I sorta like Call of Duty 5, do I hate the MP40? Yes I do, Do I sometimes use it? Yes I do.

I mean, you can compare the two games but it's difficult, it's not like there's that many aspects that have stayed true. War has changed from WWII to the Iraqi War. And so has the game, so too compare, is not fair.


Also P.S.
Cold War Game, might as well put in with Vietnam, otherwise you're in a plane flying around the entire game. Not counting a few times where you're about to do something but instead don't. Or perhaps you just sit at a desk ready to push the red button lol. And the entire game is about your will

P.P.S. Vietnam is not boring, there was much more action in Vietnam then in any other war. (In terms of constant fighting)
P.P.P.S. WWI wouldn't be bad, but I think that people would complain about the guns and etc.

P^4.S. "Modern warfare is the only real story that has held my interest." I hope you are saying that the story is the only one that really captures your interests and not it's the only real story. Because out of all or wars, that problem has the least story.


I still think the Korean War should be done, it's a war we all forget and I think that's a shame. Besides, it's not like the Korean War had a lack of countries, death and fighting, it had plenty. And you could even throw in a cameo from Alan Alda.

honestly, i think vietnam will top the modern warfares, just my opinion though. only because treyarch see the bad parts of cod waw and can improve in further series'. Plus 2010=more technology =)

theartftw wrote Modern warfare is the only real story that has held my interest. At some points I feel like I may be learning something :sarcasm:

your not a true cod player i played 1 through to 5 on veteran how beast thats a real cod man (8)