You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Barrett or Intervention?
Posted:
Barrett or Intervention?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 81
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 81
Reputation Power: 3
which do you think is better, Barrett 50 Cal or Intervention? I myself like the Barrett but what do you think?
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 25, 200914Year Member
Posts: 1,742
Reputation Power: 96
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 25, 200914Year Member
Posts: 1,742
Reputation Power: 96
50 cal
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 170
Reputation Power: 11
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 170
Reputation Power: 11
I like the barrett. The thermal on it is way more accurate than that of the Intervention.
The Quickscoping is also a lot easier too.
One of the bad things is the recoil, but because I have good aim, It doesn't bother me a bit.
<3 Barrett .50 cal.
//
cK QuickScope
The Quickscoping is also a lot easier too.
One of the bad things is the recoil, but because I have good aim, It doesn't bother me a bit.
<3 Barrett .50 cal.
//
cK QuickScope
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 81
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 81
Reputation Power: 3
yeah, quick scoping is by far way better with the 50 cal.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 6
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 6
Reputation Power: 0
i think Barrett for running round and quick scoping, but im a fan of the intervention because i think the accuracy is better for a unknown reason
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 347
Reputation Power: 13
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 347
Reputation Power: 13
AttemptedHacks wrote i think Barrett for running round and quick scoping, but im a fan of the intervention because i think the accuracy is better for a unknown reason
u cant quick-scope with the barrett becuase its almost a full auto gun so you can just spray wit it. Barret .50cal quick scoping= failures at sniping. intervention quick scoping=good at quick scoping.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 200915Year Member
Posts: 983
Reputation Power: 41
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 200915Year Member
Posts: 983
Reputation Power: 41
^why use a gun that you have more chance of missing?^
50 cal ftw
but if you make montages you have to use the intervention, it looks better for some reason
edit-but the m40ao3 pwns them both
Last edited by TTG_STRAWZYx ; edited 1 time in total
50 cal ftw
but if you make montages you have to use the intervention, it looks better for some reason
edit-but the m40ao3 pwns them both
Last edited by TTG_STRAWZYx ; edited 1 time in total
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 05, 200915Year Member
Posts: 8,264
Reputation Power: 712
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 05, 200915Year Member
Posts: 8,264
Reputation Power: 712
The Intervention and the Barrett both have their up points. Such as the Barrett can be used to spray - which is not good. The Intervention is beastly but the Barrett is just better, i don't know why.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 200915Year Member
Posts: 8,515
Reputation Power: 520
I think the intervention is really good
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 21, 200914Year Member
Posts: 486
Reputation Power: 27
Intervention all the way! But every once in a while I change it to the .50 cal, cause I do good with it for like 4 games then I suck with it so I have to switch back to the Intervention
100.
100.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.