you also say there are 3 of us but:

1. TankDempsey
2. RandomBox
3. John_US
4. MoldySquishFish
5. jumparoundalot
6. Tigersapimp

vs

1. prash69

id say this is pretty one sided

yeah they arent changing the coding they made it so the mystery man could run away to the next map

right, i'm sorry that telling someone how to get the code of ascension is 'doing work for me'.

and i have tried searching the internet for both the new code and how to rip the code from your hard drive, and i cant find anything. even when i find the file, i still have no way of decrypting it, because i cant find any tutorials on how to do it.

you're looking wayyy into this, i'm not using the religion argument as an excuse.

it's actually simple, and it seems to me that you're just bored and you want to have an argument.

So let me put it to you this way: i want to see the code after the update to see if anything has changed. i've looked for it - can't find it. i'm trying to get it for myself but i need a bit of help to do so. I'm not asking people to do it for me. Once i've seen it, then i can show others and we can all be certain that nothing is left.

simple, no disputes involved. so instead if repeatedly telling me i'm wrong, you could put yourself to use instead of 'indulging in my own laziness'. i could argue that you're lazy for not helping me. you haven't 'presented anything of value' either; all you've done is just insult me and tell me that i'm wrong.

NB - you're not a fictional character.

TankDempsey wrote you also say there are 3 of us but:

1. TankDempsey
2. RandomBox
3. John_US
4. MoldySquishFish
5. jumparoundalot

vs

1. prash69

id say this is pretty one sided

instead of wasting time doing that you could be more practical and help me out on this one. i really do not care about who agrees/disagrees with me, because it's not an argument. you're looking too much into this, buddy.

who really cares about easter eggs?

prash69 wrote

TankDempsey wrote you also say there are 3 of us but:

1. TankDempsey
2. RandomBox
3. John_US
4. MoldySquishFish
5. jumparoundalot

vs

1. prash69

id say this is pretty one sided

instead of wasting time doing that you could be more practical and help me out on this one. i really do not care about who agrees/disagrees with me, because it's not an argument. you're looking too much into this, buddy.

You're right. Its not an argument when we have the facts. Sorry that you don't know how to rip it yourself, but I feel like thats the only thing that you'll trust, given that I found my results in about 10 seconds on google.

RandomBox wrote

prash69 wrote

TankDempsey wrote you also say there are 3 of us but:

1. TankDempsey
2. RandomBox
3. John_US
4. MoldySquishFish
5. jumparoundalot

vs

1. prash69

id say this is pretty one sided

instead of wasting time doing that you could be more practical and help me out on this one. i really do not care about who agrees/disagrees with me, because it's not an argument. you're looking too much into this, buddy.

You're right. Its not an argument when we have the facts. Sorry that you don't know how to rip it yourself, but I feel like thats the only thing that you'll trust, given that I found my results in about 10 seconds on google.

would you please send me the link of your result. seriously, it's not hard to press ctrl c and the ctrl v. in fact, it would be quicker than to tell me that i'm wrong again.

prash69 wrote
(1)So let me put it to you this way: i want to see the code after the update to see if anything has changed. i've looked for it - can't find it.

(2)you haven't 'presented anything of value' either; all you've done is just insult me and tell me that i'm wrong.

(3)NB - you're not a fictional character.

ill address you quotes in list format.. (since im so lazy)

1. Guess why you cant find it anywhere?? because it doesnt exist. Something like that would be posted EVERYWHERE on this and many other sites the second it would be discovered like the original/only code was.(probably 2-3 days after the alleged update)

2. I have presented multiple arguments explaining why it is impossible for us to prove something doesnt exist (religion argument), how you could find (if it exists) the new code (yes my suggestion was a google search but look how well that worked for randombox) The insults, i will admit are more of just my speech style on here because it gets tiresome writing the same arguments over since you refuse to listen and keep saying the same thing (i want to see the code and until i do i wont budge my position).

3. No shit im not a fictional character but it is my name on here and i did that out of levity (id rather not post my real information on the internet because that is plain stupid)

so now that i have shown you (atleast i hope i did) how your argument has no validity while mine has evidential (as much as you can have) and personal support, i hope you will accept that what cant be found on the internet, doesnt exist (and yes people including me have searched for different code and always get the same thing).

TTG_Danny_UK wrote who really cares about easter eggs?

obviously jesus and the easter bunny...

TankDempsey wrote

prash69 wrote
(1)So let me put it to you this way: i want to see the code after the update to see if anything has changed. i've looked for it - can't find it.

(2)you haven't 'presented anything of value' either; all you've done is just insult me and tell me that i'm wrong.

(3)NB - you're not a fictional character.

ill address you quotes in list format.. (since im so lazy)

1. Guess why you cant find it anywhere?? because it doesnt exist. Something like that would be posted EVERYWHERE on this and many other sites the second it would be discovered like the original/only code was.(probably 2-3 days after the alleged update)

2. I have presented multiple arguments explaining why it is impossible for us to prove something doesnt exist (religion argument), how you could find (if it exists) the new code (yes my suggestion was a google search but look how well that worked for randombox) The insults, i will admit are more of just my speech style on here because it gets tiresome writing the same arguments over since you refuse to listen and keep saying the same thing (i want to see the code and until i do i wont budge my position).

3. No **** im not a fictional character but it is my name on here and i did that out of levity (id rather not post my real information on the internet because that is plain stupid)

so now that i have shown you (atleast i hope i did) how your argument has no validity while mine has evidential (as much as you can have) and personal support, i hope you will accept that what cant be found on the internet, doesnt exist (and yes people including me have searched for different code and always get the same thing).

no need to swear. randombox hasnt provided a link. and i wont budge my position because i havent seen any proof.

a reason for why the new code hasnt been posted? no one has bothered to check again. and if they had, i'm sure a few people would post to say nothing has changed.

you could just help, instead of arguing.