You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 13,074
Reputation Power: 2221
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 13,074
Reputation Power: 2221
Agreed with Arfur, it would be better as a 500x500
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201114Year Member
Posts: 3,153
Reputation Power: 160
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201114Year Member
Posts: 3,153
Reputation Power: 160
Its Alright!
5/10
8)
5/10
8)
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,325
Reputation Power: 61
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,325
Reputation Power: 61
It's all too cramped.............
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,601
Reputation Power: 66
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,601
Reputation Power: 66
Its a bit too much in a small area....4/10
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.