TTGNAPALMBATH wrote jmoney48 chill out. People will always hate on some part of every game. No-one is attacking you no need to get mad.

lol im not mad i actually like the game im just tired of ppl crying all the time over a game

StopThePro wrote

Goth_Wolf wrote BF3 here I come.

Hahaha, BF3? All you've seen from that game so far is like 10 minutes of gameplay. The multiplayer, just like BF2, will be terrible. Just because the graphics are good doesn't mean it's the best game ever.

Notice how BF steals alot of elements from CoD? Like the EMP from the gameplay trailer.

It is quite clear that you are one of the people who wants the game to be as realistic as possible. I am glad that Treyarch are bringing out this "gimmicky" sort of map - I fear that gamers nowadays care more about the graphics than the quality of the game.

Read that word again:

GAME

hear hear dice games r amazing on graphics cant deny that at all but very glitchy multiplayer and the campains seem to be very anticlimactic call of duty is far superior in gameplay and what it lacks in graphics over bf it makes up tenfold is every other way eg multiplayer servers game controls the interactiveness of the maps themselves. so to sum up bf games may look good and are good games yet suck balls compare to the multi billion dollar empire that is call of duty.

StopThePro wrote

Goth_Wolf wrote BF3 here I come.

Hahaha, BF3? All you've seen from that game so far is like 10 minutes of gameplay. The multiplayer, just like BF2, will be terrible. Just because the graphics are good doesn't mean it's the best game ever.

Notice how BF steals alot of elements from CoD? Like the EMP from the gameplay trailer.

It is quite clear that you are one of the people who wants the game to be as realistic as possible. I am glad that Treyarch are bringing out this "gimmicky" sort of map - I fear that gamers nowadays care more about the graphics than the quality of the game.

Read that word again:

GAME

Okay BF and CoD are two different types of multiplayer gameplay so I'll leave it at that.


Also to all of you saying I'm crying, I'm really not if I don't enjoy something anymore I'm not going to support it simple as that, also when did I ever say it was expensive? I have the money for it and well over the money for it I just don't want it, it's that simple.

Also to all of you saying after a few months I'm going to get it blah blah blah, if that was the case why do I still not have the MW2 map packs? You guys are just all little fanboys and want to flame anyone who doesn't approve of what you like CoD is a dying brand Activision is doing to CoD what they did to Guitar Hero in my eyes abusing it then tossing it aside. I was reluctant to buy First Strike and I'm most likely not going to be buying this unless I'm proven wrong with it being user friendly when I try it at my friends house, why would I waste money even if it is only $15 on something I won't like and could buy something else I would enjoy for $15?

jmoney48 wrote i like how most of u r flaming on black ops if u dont like the game who cares every call of duty game had its positive and negative its a game its going to happen like mw2 was full of hackers and modders so what if u think black ops isnt all that good its a game its going to have things u dont like so gtfo and stop B****ing. And i like all the call of duty's

Also to this I never said I hate CoD I love Treyarchs campaign what I said is it's zombies is getting more and more user friendly that's all and why am I the only one getting flamed over this there's thousands of people who complain about black ops multiplayer but oh well fanboys are fanboys.

Anyone who denies zombies are getting more user friendly (easy) has never really played Zombie Verruckt on World at War.

jmoney48 wrote i like how most of u r flaming on black ops if u dont like the game who cares every call of duty game had its positive and negative its a game its going to happen like mw2 was full of hackers and modders so what if u think black ops isnt all that good its a game its going to have things u dont like so gtfo and stop B****ing. And i like all the call of duty's

And never flamed black ops I stated my opinion on it's newest map pack and asked others and everyone here changed it into a flame war I love CoD Black Ops just not for MP.

NK_D00M wrote Please do cry about 15 dollars that you'll either spend at McDonald's, seeing a movie, or something else that doesn't have any replay value, if your really not intrested in the map pack why even bother making a post about it? I like not spending money just like the next guy, I'll save the nit picking for something that costs more than a pack of newport 100s with a pepsi

Also this is dumb I have plenty of Arcade games that cost less then $15 and have more replay value then CoD, shit I have FF8 for playstation and that has more replay value then CoD got that for $20 off Amazon. I don't care about the cost of the map pack it's the content in the map pack.

im not because im not spending another 10 on **** maps

lol ttg people arguing is the funniest thing since nam xD ok, so heres how it goes:

Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time>Battlefield Series>Crysis 2>Cod4>W@W>Bulletstorm>Gears of War>Ping Pong>Watching Educational Television>Getting Shot in the Foot>MWPoo and BO

lol i have an xbox 360 but i gotta admit this is how the console chain goes:

PC Gaming>PS3>Xbox 360>Wii

I'm buying this dlc, y? cuz i wanna effing kill George Romero for disappointing with Dairy of The Dead lol nah I'm only buying it cuz I have 1600 ms point just sitting there and it looks fun

Im buying the pack. That is all not trying to cause a fight because of all the nerds here
-__-

why does anyone care of this dumbs opinion lol we dont care if ur not buying it and who actually pays for dlc stuff anymore when u can get them free lol

Im getting it cuz some kid game me microsoft points to do his rank in MW2.

I am buying the map pack simply for the zombies i don't have much intrest in the other maps hopefully it will cost 800ms