a77u wrote So here is the truth that most of you cant accept:
BF3 is superior in almost every way. You have destructible environments, a story that actually is plausible and fun, the multiplayer has way more options and bigger maps, player counts, VEHICLES!!!. On the graphics side, no matter what youre playing on, BF3 will have better graphics and an up to date engine unlike MW3 which will be using the same engine as MW2 and Black Ops. I know you fanboys want to waste your money on it because its a Cod. go ahead and do it.

I like how you say bigger maps like its a good thing lol all people to on bfbc is camp it is boring and slow paced .

You can't compare what is going to be better coz BF3 nad MW3 are two different games.

Mw3 will be alot better and way more will buy Mw3! Mw3 all the way 8)

battlefield is a good game but call of duty is the best by far! :arrow: :arrow: :arrow:

**** Hell its what game i like how does that make me a fanboy if i want to buy cod instead of battlefield GTFO

Bf is shit altogether and cod is great so mw3 beats bf3

wow are you retarded? its personal preference!!! no game is "better" u can only compare two games like black ops and mw2 since its in the same franchise... comparing bf3 and mw3 is like saying a fkn banana is better then a grape... where as comparing 2 CoD games is like comparing purple grapes with green grapes.

if u like bf3 ur obviously gunna root for it.. vice versa with mw3...

Bigger maps? Dude bigger maps suck. Why do you think so many people like nuketown and vote nuketown when it comes up? :facepalm:

Both are good but DIFFERENT games. CoD is a run-n-gun game and Battlefield is a more strategic game.

HitmarkersEve wrote Both games look awesome to me. I will be enjoying 2 great games while fanboys stay with just one game just because they don't want to admit both are really good games.

The words of reason!