6/10 It seems a little bit over sharpened to me and did you use poster edges?

InflictedFate wrote

TTG_Design wrote i would give it a 5/10 also for the background which is really just brushes and it wont be higher because he used a copy right image which he copy and pasted from google images if u went into a GFX job u have to use ur own images otherwise if posters with non roylety free images people that made them would be sued

Congratulations, you are wrong based on assumptions. Good job. Now, for the TRUE information, I did NOT use just brushes. And I did NOT copy this image from google images. It is not a copyrighted image. It was a render off of planetrenders.net, which allows you to use their renders in your work. Try not to spread around false information just because you think you know what you are talking about.

what so a picture of IRON MAN which is a charactor (logo) from disney i think is not a copy righted? also using someone elses render as well more proof it is not your work retard

Stop getting annoyed because people are rating it 5/10 its not the best ok..

how many layers is it? tbh with you it looks like its just pasted ontop of each other.

but 7/10

i will give it a 9.41872983682469246!!!!

TTG_Design wrote

InflictedFate wrote

TTG_Design wrote i would give it a 5/10 also for the background which is really just brushes and it wont be higher because he used a copy right image which he copy and pasted from google images if u went into a GFX job u have to use ur own images otherwise if posters with non roylety free images people that made them would be sued

Congratulations, you are wrong based on assumptions. Good job. Now, for the TRUE information, I did NOT use just brushes. And I did NOT copy this image from google images. It is not a copyrighted image. It was a render off of planetrenders.net, which allows you to use their renders in your work. Try not to spread around false information just because you think you know what you are talking about.

what so a picture of IRON MAN which is a charactor (logo) from disney i think is not a copy righted? also using someone elses render as well more proof it is not your work retard

When did I ever say it was my work? I clearly stated that it was a render from Planetrenders.net. Never did I say that I made "ironman". Congratulations, calling me a retard just backfired on you. You also stated that I copyrighted it by copying and pasting it from google images. If you knew better, the image wasn't always Iron Man by himself, it was rendered. Nice one bud. Now, Leave the topic and allow people to rate and stop flaming. There always has to be at least one person, which happens to be you, that can't accept decent artwork.

great editing on the back ground but it would look better in my opinion if you did the iron man in a color graphite looking texture but it looks grrreeeeaatt

DaAraB wrote 6/10 It seems a little bit over sharpened to me and did you use poster edges?

Yeah I did sharpen it quite a bit. Unfortunately it was too bland without the sharpening. So I decided I would go with the sharpened version. And no I did not.

Guys I'm not getting annoyed at the rating. Im getting annoyed at their reasoning. Falsely accusing me of something will definitely get me annoyed. Not a 5/10 from someone that doesn't know what they are talking about. I can handle that.

Inflicted, these kids have no idea
what they are talking about...
that signature is nassttyyy.

InflictedFate wrote

DaAraB wrote 6/10 It seems a little bit over sharpened to me and did you use poster edges?

Yeah I did sharpen it quite a bit. Unfortunately it was too bland without the sharpening. So I decided I would go with the sharpened version. And no I did not.

If it was me before I sharpened it make a new layer, apply image then try a Gaussian blur or distort ocean ripple then erase the focal.

DaAraB wrote

InflictedFate wrote

DaAraB wrote 6/10 It seems a little bit over sharpened to me and did you use poster edges?

Yeah I did sharpen it quite a bit. Unfortunately it was too bland without the sharpening. So I decided I would go with the sharpened version. And no I did not.

If it was me before I sharpened it make a new layer, apply image then try a Gaussian blur or distort ocean ripple then erase the focal.

I did that exactly, but it just didn't turn out right with this one man. Thanks for the tips though. I didn't go all out on this sig or anything.