sakemodz69 wrote

zIJonnny wrote For a start rangers were in man utds group and drew 0-0 on both legs in the champions league this season rangers and celtic have been to Eufa cup finales And look at the diffrence in money english teams get rangers and celtic would get top 10 every season a mean they would beat every team that got promoted and teams like stoke fulham wigan rangers would beat most teams week in week out except top 5 (man u arsenal chelsea man city liverpool) and btw rangers and celtic will do amizin in europe this season .

WATP

lol they would both get relegated if they came into the epl the drew with man u in a 1 off game thats why all the spl players that leave celtic and rangers go to championship clubs because there not good enough for the prem

i agree most player's will not go on to bigger things but what about the likes of Larsson? one of the worlds most prolific strikers? he played for celtic then moved to Utd and barca...

I dont know tbh bro. It would be good.

Yes it should.. don't see why there not there.

_BeaR_ wrote you cant say they suck when they have both been to a UEFA cup final,

You just know its always going to be Rangers or Celtic winning the league, (Out of 12 teams),

BUT! the prems not much better, I can only see 3 teams Man U, Chelsea or Liverpool winning the prem.(out of 20 teams),

and for the record Fifa dosent know **** about card ratings for lower teams, I mean Emile Heskey is fxcking gold!,

Rant Over (SPL FTW),

- Bear 8)

Exactly, Celtic or R*ngers could both probably finish above Arsenal and Liverpool, Celtic first team to win the Champions League and R*ngers the most successful club in the world, so shut it, you pile of English wankers, and go watch your modern day clubs beating teams like Stoke 9-0, *****.

Ibrox was in fifa 99