RAGExIVIONSTERx wrote :idea: BF3

MW3 ALL THE WAY!! :arrow:

explain yourself. please sir. I DARE YOU :trollin:

You can't compare the games in my opinion but from the gameplay that i have seen Battlefield has taken the lead right now.

i love the battlefield series its a good break from cod but cod>battlefield

I love Call of Duty better than Battlefield. The quality of Call of Duty's gameplay features are way better than Battlefield's.

yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa battlefields better, i will admit though cod4 was amazing.

Connect wrote I love Call of Duty better than Battlefield. The quality of Call of Duty's gameplay features are way better than Battlefield's.

How is it better by anyway? the only main difference i can see that CoD has over battlefield is camos and a bigger ad fund. Activision just spends on ads and showing off the game every chance they can. Look at it this way to IW failed so hard on mw2 that they now need 2 more people to help them. Thats 3! people working on one single game.Dice does it alone and they're game have so much better just everything. Vehicles, Destruction, Squads, way bigger maps. mw3 has Killstreaks and better gun customization. not much you can compare because mw3 doesnt have as many features. final note BF3>CoD

-LinkinPark- wrote I wouldn't say Battlefield are harder than CoD. There more strategic than CoD's multiplayer and working as a team plays a big part in it.

Frostbite 2.0 is the best game engine out right now and IW's is too outdated to be as good as DICE's.

BF3 will be better this year even if MW3 sells more.

You are wrong. If MW3 sells more and has more players, then it is better. Nobody cares about graphics. I would play Call of Duty if it were in 2D. I wouldn't care. There is more teamplay and strategy in Call of Duty and it is easier for beginners to get used to

Battlefield games are gay as **** and i know MW3 will prolly not be that good but no matter what MW3 will be better cause EA doesn't know how to make a gun game.

JeeezusChrist wrote I love how everyone is so quick to dump modern warfare 3 because if you knew anything than you'd know modern warfare 3 is running in frostbite 2.0 also. On top of that, where are you getting your info that Battlefield is going to be better? No where. The battlefield series is a good series don't get me wrong but call of duty has been the game since cod 4 came out and your trying to tell me a game with that much reputation is going to fail, is going to be overpowered, is going to suck? I'll agree with the next guy that Black ops was a disaster but modern warfare 1 and modern warfare 2 are by far better than battlefield 3 will be and that's not even to mention what modern warfare 3 is going to make it look like.
Oh yeah and way to be completely byist in your poles

Ok man I really love you and could not love you any more (noHOMO). Graphics do not tell anything anyway. It's the story and the modes and the gameplay. Battlefield could be just like homefront. They didn't let us know much, and when we got it, it sucked balls. Couldn't BF3 be the same way???? We have seen minor parts of MW3 not major parts because they want to let you know there are better things in the game than what they are just showing. But BF3 shows their best parts. That's like saying, "hey this is as good as it ets no better." But MW3 is Like, "hey if you like this buy the gaames 'cause there is stuff 20000x better than what we are showing you!"

MW3 > BF3 and always will be!

Duke5465 wrote Battlefield games are gay as **** and i know MW3 will prolly not be that good but no matter what MW3 will be better cause EA doesn't know how to make a gun game.

Right and this is an MW3 forum. There needs to be no battlefield discussion here. MOD CLOSE PLZ