No, you are not. Try running BFBC2 maxed at 1920x1080 and see if you get anywhere near 60 fps.

an ECS motherboard??? why? and I agree with r00t_b33r and an Athlon processor?

By 'every game' do you mean runescape and pacman? I don't see that PC running anything higher than that. Enjoy your 5 FPS on BF3.

and only 4 gigs of ram my laptop has higher then that?

--Hobo-- wrote and only 4 gigs of ram my laptop has higher then that?

What do you mean 'only'? 4gigs is more than enough for most people. Games only use 1 - 2 gigs max.

yeah. all that 8 gigs+ is a joke when it comes to ram. cause typical users and even gamers wont ever touch that amount of ram usage.

r00t_b33r wrote No, you are not. Try running BFBC2 maxed at 1920x1080 and see if you get anywhere near 60 fps.

i do run it on max... with 1920x1080 resolution, with 75 fps... btw the pnly way to check fps on bfbc2 is with fraps, so running another application, while the game is running at 75 fps is more than enough. computing power. 1gb of graphics memory is plenty. as well as 3.4GHz is plenty

vowywowy wrote

r00t_b33r wrote No, you are not. Try running BFBC2 maxed at 1920x1080 and see if you get anywhere near 60 fps.

i do run it on max... with 1920x1080 resolution, with 75 fps... btw the pnly way to check fps on bfbc2 is with fraps, so running another application, while the game is running at 75 fps is more than enough. computing power. 1gb of graphics memory is plenty. as well as 3.4GHz is plenty

Of course you can on the lowest quality settings. Try it maxed (AA and everything) and see how low your framerate gets. And a graphics card's VRAM (Frame Buffer) is not what determines its performance. Nor does clock speed of a CPU. Fraps does not impact performance very significantly either.

I doubt Fraps affects your performance. It probably affects it by barely 1 less FPS.